Reading the topic about more graphics equating to lesser gameplay got me thinking...
Many would describe the quest for better graphics as the quest for making things look more realistic. Extrapolated to the pinnacle goal of such a quest would mean that the most realistic-looking game you could get would be a Live-Action game. So since this is a hypothetical scenario, lets set up the parameters for the answer.
Assume that the maker of the first Live-Action videogame had all the budget and resources needed to pull off such an game. At that point it would be more like making a movie than designing a game. Film the entire thing in a green-screen (or whatever it's called) studio much like the newer Star Wars movies were shot entirely in such a place. Or it could even be done on-location for modern-day-based shooters.
So such a game gets created, the ultimate in "realistic" videogaming. Do you think Live-Action games would become "the new thing"? Or would it turn out to be just another gimmick doomed to failure? Edit: (forgot part of the question) If you think it would be a failure, what - if anything - would have to be done for you to consider it a success?
Many would describe the quest for better graphics as the quest for making things look more realistic. Extrapolated to the pinnacle goal of such a quest would mean that the most realistic-looking game you could get would be a Live-Action game. So since this is a hypothetical scenario, lets set up the parameters for the answer.
Assume that the maker of the first Live-Action videogame had all the budget and resources needed to pull off such an game. At that point it would be more like making a movie than designing a game. Film the entire thing in a green-screen (or whatever it's called) studio much like the newer Star Wars movies were shot entirely in such a place. Or it could even be done on-location for modern-day-based shooters.
So such a game gets created, the ultimate in "realistic" videogaming. Do you think Live-Action games would become "the new thing"? Or would it turn out to be just another gimmick doomed to failure? Edit: (forgot part of the question) If you think it would be a failure, what - if anything - would have to be done for you to consider it a success?