Pre-owned games banned? Are you cool with that?

MrBaguette

New member
Jan 26, 2012
287
0
0
So I'm hearing rumours that Microsoft and other big time corporations are thinking of banning pre-owned games entirely. Mostly using that little code that let's the user register he game to his console only. Now I don't know about you guys but I love pre-owned games. Sifting through the pile of used games at the store and finding classics at a third the price. The only reason I can think of why Microsoft would pull this move is so they can make more money and I'm no specialist but I think they are pretty well off.
Is there something I'm missing from the picture?
 

MetalDooley

Cwipes!!!
Feb 9, 2010
2,054
0
1
Country
Ireland
Nope not cool with that at all and I don't even buy preowned games very often.If Microsoft do go ahead with this scheme then I will not be buying their next console(or possibly any future ones either)
 

hopeneverdies

New member
Oct 1, 2008
3,398
0
0
I'm a poor person, so yes that does bother me a lot. I very rarely impulse buy a game at full price, typically waiting a few months or even years to get it. By that time, usually the price has dropped a fair bit. And from there, the Used price is a bit lower than that.

Granted, that shouldn't be bothering me this generation because I really only play on my PC, but if I want a DS game then, yeah, I'm looking for used.

There's also the problem of not letting people borrow games from their friends. Would they have to hand the entire console over? And game rentals too. If I were to hypothetically go to Blockbuster or some such and grab a game for the weekend, how would that work?
 

MrBaguette

New member
Jan 26, 2012
287
0
0
hopeneverdies said:
I'm a poor person, so yes that does bother me a lot. I very rarely impulse buy a game at full price, typically waiting a few months or even years to get it. By that time, usually the price has dropped a fair bit. And from there, the Used price is a bit lower than that.
yeah that's what I'm talking about, I feel as if Microsoft is just going to alienate a big portion of gamers for their wallets.
 

woodaba

New member
May 31, 2011
1,011
0
0
TheKasp said:
Like in all the threads: I have next to no love left for used games or people buying used. You are supporting a chain of stores which are run by assholes, abuse their customers, employees and the one industry relying on first hand sales through them.

And I am also a PC gamer. I just laugh at all you nonsense prophecies about the future of consoles when games start to be bound to an account or such.
What about people who can't afford to buy used?

What about people who can't find a new copy?

What about used cars? And Books? Are they bad too? Do you have "little sympathy" for someone who buys a used car?

No matter how anti-consumer companies like Gamestop are, this is like trying to get rid of an anthill with a nuke. Banning used games is the most ridiculous, ant-consumer bullshit anyone has ever thought of.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
If it resulted in new games being less comically overpriced I'd be fine with it. I'm a lot more worried about it killing game rentals than pre-owned. Without rentals I'd likely never touch the console again, and I certainly wouldn't invest in a new one.
 

targren

New member
May 13, 2009
1,314
0
0
TheKasp said:
Like in all the threads: I have next to no love left for used games or people buying used. You are supporting a chain of stores which are run by assholes, abuse their customers, employees and the one industry relying on first hand sales through them.
Nice troll, except for one problem. Gamestop is FAR from the only one selling used games. In fact, anyone who's got half a brain knows that you sell directly to the buyer. You get more money than GS would give you, buyer pays less than Gamestop would charge them, and maybe the site (Amazon or Ebay, e.g.) takes a small cut that doesn't change either of the above two facts.

As for the "industry", fuck them. EVERY OTHER industry on the goddamn planet has to deal with a secondhand market that nets them nothing but recognition. And the bullshit about used sales killing the industry is just that. It did just fine all the way up through the PS2 era. In fact, I think the PS2 age was one of the most prolific periods in gaming history.

The only reason you're seeing this garbage now is because the console makers had to go and hook the boxes up to the internet, which gives these whiny bastards a way to dip their fingers into secondhand sales. It's a power/moneygrab that they didn't have the means of doing before, and has nothing to do with "an abused industry."

Consider your blatant apologism "called out."
 

LilithSlave

New member
Sep 1, 2011
2,462
0
0
Not even close. And it shows the where the rabbit hole of anti-piracy goes to. You give them an inch, they take a mile. Major video game developers don't just want to stop piracy, they want to stop competition. They want to stop used games, they want to stop indie titles, they want to stop options. Options that lead to you buying titles other than their $60 pile of rot.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
I think the better question is "do we need three threads going that are literally the exact same conversation?" Anyways, I'll post my thoughts here same as in the other two.

RJ 17 said:
Yeah, as numerous people on even the first page of comments have posted, this is just a rumor and there's absolutely no way that it's true. For starters it would quite literally murder the game rental industry. But beyond that, it wouldn't just be XBox shooting itself in the foot, it'd be XBox shooting itself right in the dick. It'd be the worst move in the videogame industry since the Virtual Boy.

I really think that the first Blood Rayne game has a fantastic quote that sums up this situation. When she explains her aversion to jumping into the water, her partner/friend/whatever, I forget, it's been too long since I've played that game, tells her that it'll be fine and "it won't kill you". To this Rayne says "Yeah, neither will jamming a pencil into my eye, but that doesn't mean I should do it." So will it kill us? No. But it will make us all want to jam pencils into the eyes of everyone that works at Microsoft while also not buying the console seeing as how they've apparently turned into vampire game nazis...alright I think I got a little off track here.

Point is that as a business decision that would be truly a horrible idea. I can only imagine that the day XBox does officially announce "No more used games!" is the day that a boycott against them begins...and I can't help but think the boycott will be supported by many, many gamers. I mean hell, even if I was a PS3 player, I'd be pissed off about this kind of thing purely on principle.
So yeah, Guppy, I agree with you entirely on the note about rental companies. I also think that in general this idea would be equatable to business suicide for Microsoft if they really go through with this.
TheKasp said:
Like in all the threads: I have next to no love left for used games or people buying used. You are supporting a chain of stores which are run by assholes, abuse their customers, employees and the one industry relying on first hand sales through them.
As for Mr. Holier Than Thou PC gamer, I can understand your view on stores like GameStop, there are plenty of stories about there about why they're shitty. But 1: since you're a PC gamer and not a console gamer, you really have no say in this argument since it has no effect over you. And 2: last I checked the gaming companies themselves were doing just fine. The used game sales argument is like the argument rock stars and other bands had against Napster: "We're losing money! No one is buying our CD's!" While that is true, they forget how much money they make while they're on a concert tour...same way game developers seem to forget how much money they make off of a game during the first couple weeks of it's released when EVERYONE has to buy it new.

In short: it's hard to feel sympathy for game developers whining about losing money before they turn around and snort another rail off of a stripper's ass.
 

jamez525

Wasting His Title
Oct 4, 2009
176
0
0
TheKasp said:
Like in all the threads: I have next to no love left for used games or people buying used. You are supporting a chain of stores which are run by assholes, abuse their customers, employees and the one industry relying on first hand sales through them.

And I am also a PC gamer. I just laugh at all you nonsense prophecies about the future of consoles when games start to be bound to an account or such.
Here is an interesting situation for you. My friend buys a game at full price (probably from a store, so he is already supporting them but that is irrelevant).

Now let's say he doesn't like this game, but I am interested in it.
What do you have against me buying this game from my friend? It is pre-owned after all, the developers make no money from this sale.
 

jamez525

Wasting His Title
Oct 4, 2009
176
0
0
TheKasp said:
jamez525 said:
To be honest, before we go this way we have to finally resolve how the ownership of software licenses is actually handled. Since the publisher and developer have now a way to enforce it they go ballistic against it. I am actually quite sure it will be resolved if one company wants to go this way. Like you see, the backlash is big enough so that some will file a lawsuit against it.

And like you maybe deduced from my post: My actual gripe is with people actually supporting chains like GameStop and GAME. I have my reasons for that from a personal expirience.
Well I see what you are saying, but the fact is game shops like GAME were never actually mentioned in the OP, it was simply referring to a single use code being sold with new games.

Although I will say I have had nothing but good service when dealing with both GAME and Gamestation recently.
 

targren

New member
May 13, 2009
1,314
0
0
TheKasp said:
I talked to many people over the last weeks about this topic. They always imply that GameStop is their only option. And there are still tons of people who seem to ignore internet as a way of distribition.

And right now I see in my city how GameStop, even though they give worse deals than the old specialised gaming stores and want more for their games, opened a second store and drive all the other stores out of buisness. GameStop, GAME and whatever are actually a retail monopoly, it just varies from place to place what they call themselfs.
I already posted in another thread how all these whiners could deal with Gamestop, since they, like you, seem to pretend it's the only option, and WITHOUT screwing over other customer. Stop selling them new games. If they didn't have pre-orders to whore out, then people wouldn't have as much incentive to sell them used games for "store credit" instead of a pittiance in cash. Perfectly legal, and doesn't require abusive DRM and circumventing consumer rights.


I never said that used games kill the industry. But used sales are damaging the industry without a doubt. If some guy at a GameStop sees me buying a game new and talks me into the used copy for 10 bucks less he costs the industry one purchase.
If the industry is being damaged, then that's their fault. As I said, EVERY other industry has been able to deal with it without crying about it. Every time someone buys a used car, he costs the industry one purchase. Every time someone finishes reading a book and gives it to a friend who might like it, the industry loses one purchase.

I repeat: SO WHAT?

And yeah, fuck the industry which delivers the game, lets support a bloodsucker like GameStop, GAME or whatever those assholes call themselfs.
You can keep obsessing over one company to your own detriment (assuming you're a gamer and not a shill for some game publisher), or you can look at the bigger picture that is being laid out for you.

Yeah, of course it's because of the internet. The internet gives the companies actually the ability to finally enforce the license areement. Durrrrrr.
First, I have NEVER seen a license on console video game. ESPECIALLY not before purchase. I have also never seen an "I agree" button that wasn't tied to a warning like "Hey, you're going into an internet game now, so if there are douchebags, it's not our fault. You've been warned." So calling it a "license agreement" is intellectually dishonest at best, and downright bullshit at worst.

Secondly, (and tangentally since, again, there is no EULA on console games) software EULAs are ALREADY bullshit in their own right. The only reason that they're able to get that sort of abusive shit to stick in the first place is because of a stupid court decision that some scumbag lawyer convinced a clueless judge or jury (can't remember which) that running software constituted making a copy of it, giving scummy software companies a way to do an end-run around the First Sale doctrine.


Lets not support the moneygrabber that deliver the games, lets support the moneygrabber that to jack shit for us instead! Yes, I just called that out. GameStop and aequivalents do jack shit for us. They give us bad deals, sell the games overpriced to give you actual ammunition for your stupid complaints and they lie. I've been lied to from GameStop employees to get to pay more money. I have no sympathy for brick&mortar stores, I have no sympathy for people supporting their business model. If you call me a troll for that, ok.
I called you a troll for your flawed logic, tunnel vision, and unconvincing apologism, not for your opinion. Personally, I'd love to see GameStop crater too, but from a bad business model. NOT from more abusive laws and tactics that reduce the value of MY property (that is, games I legally purchased.)
 

LilRock1976

New member
Jun 6, 2011
38
0
0
No I am not cool with it and here is some of my thoughts on the subject. The buying selling and trading of used goods has been a common practice for centuries, thrift stores for clothes, used car dealers for automotives, music stores for used albums, swap meets for race car parts, livestock at the market etc. etc. but the videogame industry sees to think they should be exempt from this practice.
Has Gamestop ever disclosed how much store credit has gone towards the purchase of a new game? That would be a number I would be very interested in. If you take away that ability there would be less new copies sold.
As for the argument that money for a new game purchase goes to the developer, some of it does but a hell of a lot goes towards the publisher who tells the developer how much they receive. That Volition design director Jameson Durall guy who is embracing the idea of the next Xbox not playing used games, Microsoft has not confirmed anything about this or final hardware specs BTW so everything right now is just rumor and gossip, hasn't thought this through. Brand new Volition developed games from the early PS2 era ( Summoner 1&2, Red Faction 1&2 hell even the PC games Freespace 1&2) are not on store shelves anymore so to play those you have to buy those used but if they are downloadable the money goes to the current publisher and copyright holder not the publisher. Plus if you don't buy a game during its release window and can't buy it used well you are shit out of luck then.