But the problem is, if prostitution isn't legal, people just go to illegal prostitudes (or do some sex turism). Legalizing prostitution provides prostitudes much better working conditions and legal rights.templargunman said:I think you might of missed some of my earlier points in my back and forth with Anubis. We already have stripping, and if prostitution was legalized, most strippers would have to become prostitutes, because have no doubt that if a company could change their business model to bring in more money they would, regardless of their employee's wants. So yes, people who want to be prostitutes would have the opportunity to be prostitutes, but many people who kept away from prostitution by becoming strippers will be forced into the career. Also, I don't deny that some people would want to be prostitutes, but unlike garbage, it's not a necessary job that has to be done by someone, and I never said that porn stars are weird, I understand that the porn industry has it's own awards and there is a lot of appeal to being famous for sex.
Depends upon the country/state. In Texas, prostitution itself is illegal as are most of the acts leading to sex. Notably, thanks to a three strike law, the third time a prostitute is arrested and convicted of prostitution it is tried as a felony rather than a class A misdemeanor (a severe misdemeanor).jamiedf said:it isnt illegal to pay for sex, thats the part of prostitution that is compleatly legal, its things like soliciting, kerb crawling, advertising, those are illegalKiefer13 said:I've personally never seen why it's illegal to pay money for something that it's perfectly legal to give away from free. I'm fairly sure legalising and regulating it would solve many of the problems associated with it in the first place.
it was hardly adolescent whining, considering your use of weighted words like 'inexcusable' but perhaps you would prefer it if I did behave like an adolescence so you can maintain this arrogant condescension?Sikachu said:jamiedf said:and how is it inexcusably bad? because i have used some short hand here and there? or using bases instead of basis perhaps? and i have had plenty of useful responses thank you very much so i believe people haven't had any issue with it and neither do you as you all so managed to answer the question? or may be because i didn't post it as a large formal question as i just want some opinions to see how accurate many of the statements within my readings are accurate?Sikachu said:[
For someone who appears to be a native speaker of the language, your English is inexcusably bad. If you want people to bother giving you useful responses, put a little effort into making your post clear and easy-to-read.
Prostitution, in my opinion, should be treated no differently to any other act where people sell their bodies to be disposed with by other people. In other words I refuse to pretend there's a difference between taking a cock for money and breaking your back working in a mine for it. Neither are something I would usually do by choice, and so incentivising me to do so financially seems equally exploitative either way.
Human trafficking/slavery is really where my objections to prostitution lie. But I don't think that these HAVE to be a feature of a well-implemented sex industry (see Nevada as an example of this rather than Amsterdam, which is a terrible example).hey escapist just a little question,
im in the middle of a assignment on prostitution for my university course, and all my readings on theories talk heavily of public perceptions, decisions, and opinions as a bases of a lot of arguments.
so i thought id take a little consensus of what your opinion on prostitution is and how you think it should be dealt with.
so my questions are; what are your feelings on prostitution?. why do you think people become prostitutes?. id . what your opinion on managed and tolerance zones?
also a little side note, here in the UK, prostitution is technically not illegal, just the things associated with it.
Hopefully that will quiet your adolescent whining about the standard of your language.
What concerns me more is reading "i just want some opinions to see how accurate many of the statements within my readings are accurate". I presume that this means something like 'I just wanted some opinions to see how accurate many of the statements in my reading are' and this is potentially dangerous for your assignment. Be wary of 'verifying' claims by forum. If you are trying to prove to yourself that there are people out there who genuinely hold one position or another, then the internet is a great place to open your mind. If, however, you are testing claims in the literature, you are doing it very much in the wrong way.
That sounds like a great system. Too bad the US isn't smart enough to implement something like that.80sGuy said:I really like the way prostitution is handled in Germany.
It is government regulated. So, it is TAXED and has health code standards. If a working girl contracts an STD, she's forced to retire.
The ladies can choose their clients. So, if a hooker doesn't like you, or you rub her the wrong way, she can say no, and you can't have her.
The ladies don't stand on the street, they live/work in a "pink house".
The best part....a man has to apply to get into a pink house. His genitals are inspected and he must provide a recently updated medical history to be allowed in. If a client manages to slip past all this and still transmit an STD, he is then sued, and the girl/girls he gave it to get the money.
although it is taxed as though it is a normal job, they do not receive the same protection that normal career receive (health benefits) many of the Criminologists who study the area often compare the state to being the pimp80sGuy said:I really like the way prostitution is handled in Germany.
It is government regulated. So, it is TAXED and has health code standards. If a working girl contracts an STD, she's forced to retire.
The ladies can choose their clients. So, if a hooker doesn't like you, or you rub her the wrong way, she can say no, and you can't have her.
The ladies don't stand on the street, they live/work in a "pink house".
The best part....a man has to apply to get into a pink house. His genitals are inspected and he must provide a recently updated medical history to be allowed in. If a client manages to slip past all this and still transmit an STD, he is then sued, and the girl/girls he gave it to get the money.
I think it's fine, if that's what people want to do for whatever reason. I've also dated active prostitutes in the past and they didn't seem to mind it either. Wasn't the most pleasant job in the world, but hey, that's why it pays so well. Better to work a shitty job for a fuckton of money than a shitty job for 9-to-5 wages.jamiedf said:what are your feelings on prostitution?
It's an occupation where you can earn a lot of money working very few hours. People do it to fund a university degree, support a drug habit, pay off a mortgage, pay large debts, fund an overseas trip or relocation, and any number of other things that one might need a shitload of money for really quickly. That's definitely the main reason people do it. It's rare for someone to get into it purely from the sexual angle, it's been known to happen but it's not the norm. There are also other reasons such as rebellion and so forth, but money is the main one in most cases.jamiedf said:why do you think people become prostitutes?
No.jamiedf said:id you think there should be harsher punishments in place?
I assume you mean "option" not "opposition". Where I live it's more or less unofficially legal so I guess this question is moot, but assuming it wasn't legal here then I'd say yes. Criminalising it only drives it further underground and into the hands of more unscrupulous people, which inevitably means that girls get hurt.jamiedf said:should it be legitimised as a business opposition.
I've never seen it in practice so I guess I don't know. I don't see it as a necessary thing, brothels can and do exist wherever people are economically able to set up shop and tolerance zones won't change that. If you're talking about for street walking then maybe it's a good idea but then street walking should ideally not exist anyway, it's very dangerous - legalised brothels is the way to go.jamiedf said:what your opinion on managed and tolerance zones?
I don't have enough statistics, knowledge about or experience with a system that legally supports it to answer that question. I am pretty sure, however, that even within a system where you can legally buy your hookers, there is going to be alot of forced labor. And by forced, I mean people that do it because they got no other options.Choppaduel said:wait... would you or would you not support a system where prostitution was legal, with a level of regulation of your choice?Realitycrash said:I wouldn't call it immoral, but a society where prostitution is legal there are going to be plenty of people that are doing it even though they really don't want to, to do it because they are addicted to drugs, in poverty, or what not.
Then again, in a society where it isn't legal, people still do it, except in worse conditions. Point is; If people truly, really wanna sell themselves, they should be able to do it. But society better be god-damn sure that it is what they really, really want.
Otherwise, these people need help. I can imagine few things as horrible as forced prostitution because of starvation/threats of violence/ drug abuse.