Calm down.Riff Moonraker said:The wireless is built in on the new 360 slim. I also fail to understand the part about the sleeker, less garish, and more ergonomic comment when compared to the 360 slim. Also, please define "cleaner" experience. How are my 360 experiences any less clean than your ps3 experiences? Even after losing the exclusives we had such as Mass Effect (the PS3 still doesnt get the same experience with it, because they cant get the first one), the Halo series and the Gears of War series are HUGE titles. COD fans get their map packs first on the 360. Also, Alan Wake is an exclusive I would recommend to anyone with a 360 as a must have.Accountfailed said:speaking objectively, I can say that the ps3's hardware is superior.
speaking subjectively, the exclusives are better, I think, Ratchet and Clank, Uncharted, God of War to name a few. The software is nicer, cleaner and easier, and the network is free and doesn't require you to buy a wireless adaptor to connect to wireless. the overall look the machine is sleeker, and less garish, it's also more ergonomic. IMO if you want a cleaner experience and are willing to forgive Sony for the PSN outage, go for the ps3.
I find the ps3 slim's design a lot more appealing than the 360 slim or any of its predecessors, in experience I've also found it's easier to fit into small spaces hence making it more ergonomic. when I say cleaner I mean I find it a lot nicer to use the ps3's interface -the XMB- than the 360's weird tab system. To be honest, I couldn't give two shits about multiplayer, it all sucks, so map packs don't apply to me. Also, Mass Effect wasn't an xbox exclusive, I had it for the PC (and it didn't even have the Microsoft's GFWL DRM).
Before trying to grill me out, maybe look up the definition of subjective, in MY opinion I prefer the ps3, it's interface, it's exclusives and yes, it's network. you can prefer the 360 all you want, that's not my problem, I was just giving my opinion to the OP who asked.