You can use 'Temperature Programmed Desorption' to remove an adsorbate from a surface slowly, or you can use 'Flash Desorption' to just remove all the adsorbate at once. This works because as temperature increases, entropic effects become more important. Unfortunately, all this must be done in a vacuum, otherwise you will just succeed in oxidising the surface, which is a process that cannot be reversed by simple heating. So no, heating in a fire would just oxidise the metal. Ionic compounds containing metal ions are generally coloured because of electronic transitions that are caused by heating.IsoNeko said:Does fire, actually make metal Shiny? I mean, technically it should burn off all imperfections right? So, Metal should be shiny while in a fire.
Source of idea: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXQTzJgU6qc
The question is, does Metal become Shiny if it's in fire. The answer is yes, Flame Polishing. Now my next question is, which I'm researching. At what temperature, does Flame Polishing work on Chrome.LiquidForce said:I'm quite sure it doesn't work that way... Terminator is not your preffered source of info regarding physics [or anything actually]
Im assuming your not talking about fire when you suggest this method?Lukeje said:You can use 'Temperature Programmed Desorption' to remove an adsorbate from a surface slowly, or you can use 'Flash Desorption' to just remove all the adsorbate at once. This works because as temperature increases, entropic effects become more important. Unfortunately, all this must be done in a vacuum, otherwise you will just succeed in oxidising the surface, which is a process that cannot be reversed by simple heating. So no, heating in a fire would just oxidise the metal. Ionic compounds containing metal ions are generally coloured because of electronic transitions that are caused by heating.IsoNeko said:Does fire, actually make metal Shiny? I mean, technically it should burn off all imperfections right? So, Metal should be shiny while in a fire.
Source of idea: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXQTzJgU6qc
Nope; fire would just cause surface oxidation.scarbunny said:Im assuming your not talking about fire when you suggest this method?Lukeje said:You can use 'Temperature Programmed Desorption' to remove an adsorbate from a surface slowly, or you can use 'Flash Desorption' to just remove all the adsorbate at once. This works because as temperature increases, entropic effects become more important. Unfortunately, all this must be done in a vacuum, otherwise you will just succeed in oxidising the surface, which is a process that cannot be reversed by simple heating. So no, heating in a fire would just oxidise the metal. Ionic compounds containing metal ions are generally coloured because of electronic transitions that are caused by heating.IsoNeko said:Does fire, actually make metal Shiny? I mean, technically it should burn off all imperfections right? So, Metal should be shiny while in a fire.
Source of idea: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXQTzJgU6qc
That and you cant have fire in a vacuum due to the whole lack of oxygen thing.Lukeje said:Nope; fire would just cause surface oxidation.scarbunny said:Im assuming your not talking about fire when you suggest this method?Lukeje said:You can use 'Temperature Programmed Desorption' to remove an adsorbate from a surface slowly, or you can use 'Flash Desorption' to just remove all the adsorbate at once. This works because as temperature increases, entropic effects become more important. Unfortunately, all this must be done in a vacuum, otherwise you will just succeed in oxidising the surface, which is a process that cannot be reversed by simple heating. So no, heating in a fire would just oxidise the metal. Ionic compounds containing metal ions are generally coloured because of electronic transitions that are caused by heating.IsoNeko said:Does fire, actually make metal Shiny? I mean, technically it should burn off all imperfections right? So, Metal should be shiny while in a fire.
Source of idea: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXQTzJgU6qc
Well, you could have a molecular beam of oxygen that collides with... no. That would be overthinking it. Yes, the lack of oxygen would mean fire was out of the question. You'd just use a wire with electricity going through it as the source of heat (the resistance causes heat due to the current).scarbunny said:That and you cant have fire in a vacuum due to the whole lack of oxygen thing.