Games are becoming better and better every day, with technology's capabilities becoming stronger. I think we're quite lucky, most of the games coming out nowadays are actually quite good and entertaining.
The main thing here to factor in is how you define a good/great/amazing/crap game, I grew up playing games on the atari 2600 moved onto the 48k ZX Spectrum (and 128k variant), then Megadrive, then PS1/PS2, now PS3... There are some great games from all eras and some right shonky ones. I cannot vote on this as the 3 options do not factor enough in, I see difference in the games, but it doesn't mean they are better or worse!
Well in terms of content games in the past were much more imaginative. Stories were better, but I do think that the impact of graphics was more felt... a game could be still considered good only because it had top notch graphics.
I think that in a way it's all the same... But as we are so advance in the technological area we should stop giving a crap about graphics. More story and more imagination, less bling. But that's the customers fault for buying games without souls.
I chose the 3ed option only because my choice wasnt there, i like most modern games, graphics are nice, decent story (sometimes), but there are some old games i just cant get enough of, admittedly my old games are not that old to most people, but they are to me (Mechwarrior series, diablo series, original HL, Counter strike/source (although its graphics keep it in competition with modern games), AvP.
Oops, sry for the rant.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.