Decapitation or bloodloss? Full skeletal extraction or one bone at a time?
This question is too easy and I demand recompense.
This question is too easy and I demand recompense.
Well apparently the Sarlacc injects its victims with nutrients that keep it alive over the years. I suupose if you're going to go a-strollin' around places where you're likely to come across a Sarlacc, it wwould be prudent to carry around some kind of weapon with which to shoot yourself. That is to say, as long as you get it over with quickly and don't get stupid ideas in your head like "Hey, maybe I can escape, like Boba Fett!", because everyone knows its impossible to escape the maw of the Surlacc. Yeesh, all George Lucas needs to do is get too attached to one character, and all of a sudden everyone thinks they can just waltz on out of the creature whenever they please...RagnorakTres said:I'm confused, why don't you want to be eaten by a giant sand vagina? Sure, you're gonna get digested over centuries, but hey, kill yourself first, that's how you get around that.Andronicus said:I think generally speaking, death by one big thing is preferable. Unless said big thing happens to be something like this [http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sarlacc].
I agree. Also the thought of piranhas or fire ants kind of disgusts me beyond words.Andronicus said:I think generally speaking, death by one big thing is preferable. Unless said big thing happens to be something like this [http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sarlacc].