LiquidGrape said:
You cannot seriously tell me you think Crysis is on par with the natural world.
The images on the right look awfully plastic in direct comparison.
ill tell you why i side with video games here.
in the real world on earth you dont see 85% of this natural beauty.
only a handful of people actually get that chance.
90% of the world population is too busy wasting their lives on working their ass off making a few bucks so they have a 4x4 meter room to live in and some food to eat. rarely do you go sight seeing outside your city/country.
all your life your instructed to learn and then rot in a job doing the same routine day and night. I for one prefer to live in a video game world where every day can be a new adventure and not the same old routine. i dont need to pay taxes or have a job to build a house to live in. my life is my own . the earth is a nice place to live on but humans made sure that only millionaires get to enjoy it while any average joe has to work hes whole life just to have something to give to his kids.
if we had a different society , no pointless wars i would lean towards earths side but as it right now? no thx.
oh and to answer your question , yes i do think crysis is on par with the natural world. crysis can update anytime it likes but it takes the world 1 million years to make the slightest of change. change which i wont live to see.