Quick Survey!
- Thread starter SovietSecrets
- Start date
Recommended Videos
1. Male
2. Meh
3. Meh
Now, just to clarify (and not seem like a dbag). For 2: I am okay with it be accepted even though I don't really care. I also have an issue with state of straight marriage, so it's hard to see what is being "kept sacred" or w/e. That being said, I fully support the idea of having marriage being a 100% religious affair and having all the rights and such be awarded to a separate thing all together with marriage just being a religious union that provides no civil benefits.
For 3: Um... Again, don't really care, but I understand the potential for the kids to have issues not from how they are raised but how they are treated by others, so I dunno really.
2. Meh
3. Meh
Now, just to clarify (and not seem like a dbag). For 2: I am okay with it be accepted even though I don't really care. I also have an issue with state of straight marriage, so it's hard to see what is being "kept sacred" or w/e. That being said, I fully support the idea of having marriage being a 100% religious affair and having all the rights and such be awarded to a separate thing all together with marriage just being a religious union that provides no civil benefits.
For 3: Um... Again, don't really care, but I understand the potential for the kids to have issues not from how they are raised but how they are treated by others, so I dunno really.
1. Male
2. Strongly Agree
3. Strongly Agree
Yeah, I got nothing witty to say right now. Maybe later.
2. Strongly Agree
3. Strongly Agree
Yeah, I got nothing witty to say right now. Maybe later.
Female
well marriage has always been about property and money, even since truly ancient times, and homosexuals should be alowed to have property and money so why not get married, the religious nut bags who go on about the sacred rite of marriage have no idea what they are talking about (strongly agree)
i agree with Homosexuals adopting while there is no evidence to support or disprove the idea of long term harm, giving a kid a home cant be worse than making it a ward of the state
well marriage has always been about property and money, even since truly ancient times, and homosexuals should be alowed to have property and money so why not get married, the religious nut bags who go on about the sacred rite of marriage have no idea what they are talking about (strongly agree)
i agree with Homosexuals adopting while there is no evidence to support or disprove the idea of long term harm, giving a kid a home cant be worse than making it a ward of the state
In my state (Mass.) I grew up with a girl who had 2 moms. And that was about a decade ago. What state are you in?EcksTeaSea said:
and
Male
Strongly agree
Strongly agree
Male
Legally go for it, in a church no because of the Christian values they don't encourage it, it is the churches decision. So I don't know, put whatever you want
Strongly disagree. Human beings were biologically designed for intercourse with members of the opposite sex for reproduction. You mess with the biological reproduction psychology then you have a much higher chance of the child being a homosexual. While I don't mind that, biologically speaking it makes them as useful as a panda that refuses to mate and I hate pandas
EDIT: also to the people who are so left that they think there are no consequences from a totally gay society, stop asking the people who don't 100% agree to explain themselves. We aren't asking you, seems a bit unfair to make us justify our opinions
Legally go for it, in a church no because of the Christian values they don't encourage it, it is the churches decision. So I don't know, put whatever you want
Strongly disagree. Human beings were biologically designed for intercourse with members of the opposite sex for reproduction. You mess with the biological reproduction psychology then you have a much higher chance of the child being a homosexual. While I don't mind that, biologically speaking it makes them as useful as a panda that refuses to mate and I hate pandas
EDIT: also to the people who are so left that they think there are no consequences from a totally gay society, stop asking the people who don't 100% agree to explain themselves. We aren't asking you, seems a bit unfair to make us justify our opinions
Male
STRONGLY agree
STRONGLY agree
Anyone who thinks that Homosexual people should have different rights to Heterosexual people needs a swift kick to the balls/ovaries.
STRONGLY agree
STRONGLY agree
Anyone who thinks that Homosexual people should have different rights to Heterosexual people needs a swift kick to the balls/ovaries.
Yes because Gay men are all sexual predators just looking for any chance to have sex with any man...Ahlycks said:
