R.U.S.E. Getting Free DLC From Ubisoft
- Thread starter vansau
- Start date
Finally stuff that actually makes a difference, before it was the DLC from UPlay which was just Suepr Pershings (way to make the best race in the game another tank unit they don't need) and the D-Day map (pretty good) along with Gold chips (useless because they are just some gold rims on the circle) and the RUSE theme.
What? It has its flaws but its better then most RTS games.Estoki said:
Ultratwinkie said:
Finally stuff that actually makes a difference, before it was the DLC from UPlay which was just Suepr Pershings (way to make the best race in the game another tank unit they don't need) and the D-Day map (pretty good) along with Gold chips (useless because they are just some gold rims on the circle) and the RUSE theme.
What? It has its flaws but its better then most RTS games.Estoki said:
Ultratwinkie said:
I have to say I love RUSE multiplayer. It's really great fun, and the new concepts make it like real time chess. It's nicely balanced, and nuanced.
Its radically different gameplay-wise to starcraft 2, but its just as good. I play both quite alot. Starcraft 2 has the "real time chess" thing going for it too, but it's more about speed, whereas RUSE is more about information management.
Its radically different gameplay-wise to starcraft 2, but its just as good. I play both quite alot. Starcraft 2 has the "real time chess" thing going for it too, but it's more about speed, whereas RUSE is more about information management.
Personally, I love RUSE - but I'm one of the very few people who don't like StarCraft or StarCraft 2. (I did enjoy Dawn of War though.) For people who prefer a slower pace and more emphasis on tactics (and bluffing) as opposed to clicks per seconds, I think RUSE is pretty perfect.
Then again, this is me speaking as a very, very tiny minority. It's no wonder the game isn't doing well, commercially.
- Karacan, still hoping that one day, gamers will return to liking depths.
Then again, this is me speaking as a very, very tiny minority. It's no wonder the game isn't doing well, commercially.
- Karacan, still hoping that one day, gamers will return to liking depths.
Have it, played it, liked it. Not a big fan of the direct counter system tho. If they made it so every weapon system can shoot at everything, granted some will do better than others in certain situations, it would have been a far superior game.
Free is appreciated, tho i'll still begrudge UBISOFT if they don't stop with their retarded DRM
Free is appreciated, tho i'll still begrudge UBISOFT if they don't stop with their retarded DRM
I'll be guessing that's largely due to Ubisoft redesigning the DRM so that it can't be cracked in five minutes again.Dublin Solo said:
No its not you, by this I mean that I am a very agressive player early on and I try to get as much ground as possible early one setting up defensive positions, but my ally see's this and thinks I can hold off two players while he just sits back and builds 100 King Tigers and NEVER brings them up until the last minute, by then they already have ground and air units able to kill every last one of them. I encounter these people every other game, but most I play I play alright-good games.Ultratwinkie said:
R.U.S.E is a very good game, as Karacan and others have said. There are a lot of strategies you can use, and I thought that the info they gave on each weapon was a nice touch. The factions aren't massively unbalanced, and although I haven't played multiplayer, the AI is fun to play against.