Or Somalis. Or Sierra Leoneans, Afghans, Brazilians and Americans (and, if we include Black Ops, Cubans and Vietnamese and British). I think you should either play the game you claim to hate or look up the word 'invariably'.Hides His Eyes said:Yes but the people you kill are invariably Russians.Jakub324 said:Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villainsThen maybe shooters shouldn't go; Modern Warfare 2 had a predominantly British-American task force solving the USA's problems, and Modern Warfare 3 has two British soldiers running around like James Bond even after the US declared them international criminals.Hides His Eyes said:Personally I'd like the modern military shooter genre to fade away now, it outstayed its welcome a long time ago. But if it refuses to go out with dignity, then I agree it could at least try and be a little more inventive and relevant, and stop having its gamers shoot Russians. How about a multi-cultural force of mercenaries?Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villains
As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
Ok, I was wrong. It's still a bunch of paranoid neo-con nonsense though.Jakub324 said:Or Somalis. Or Sierra Leoneans, Afghans, Brazilians and Americans (and, if we include Black Ops, Cubans and Vietnamese and British). I think you should either play the game you claim to hate or look up the word 'invariably'.Hides His Eyes said:Yes but the people you kill are invariably Russians.Jakub324 said:Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villainsThen maybe shooters shouldn't go; Modern Warfare 2 had a predominantly British-American task force solving the USA's problems, and Modern Warfare 3 has two British soldiers running around like James Bond even after the US declared them international criminals.Hides His Eyes said:Personally I'd like the modern military shooter genre to fade away now, it outstayed its welcome a long time ago. But if it refuses to go out with dignity, then I agree it could at least try and be a little more inventive and relevant, and stop having its gamers shoot Russians. How about a multi-cultural force of mercenaries?Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villains
As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
... And who is paranoid? If that was true, there would be no squishy Americans to kill. Activision exist to make money and they have a formula that works very very well without too much change, so why would they endanger that in favour of pleasing the whiney minority? Do you hate everything that's successful? Does an intellectual property have to crawl around in the gutters before you'll respect it?Hides His Eyes said:Ok, I was wrong. It's still a bunch of paranoid neo-con nonsense though.Jakub324 said:Or Somalis. Or Sierra Leoneans, Afghans, Brazilians and Americans (and, if we include Black Ops, Cubans and Vietnamese and British). I think you should either play the game you claim to hate or look up the word 'invariably'.Hides His Eyes said:Yes but the people you kill are invariably Russians.Jakub324 said:Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villainsThen maybe shooters shouldn't go; Modern Warfare 2 had a predominantly British-American task force solving the USA's problems, and Modern Warfare 3 has two British soldiers running around like James Bond even after the US declared them international criminals.Hides His Eyes said:Personally I'd like the modern military shooter genre to fade away now, it outstayed its welcome a long time ago. But if it refuses to go out with dignity, then I agree it could at least try and be a little more inventive and relevant, and stop having its gamers shoot Russians. How about a multi-cultural force of mercenaries?Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villains
As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
Street fighter i understand, but how in the hell is Dead Rising racist?Salad Is Murder said:The Dead Rising and Street Fighter games have always seemed pretty racist to me...maybe Capcom games as a general rule. I mean, come on...Dee Jay, T.Hawk for realsies Capcom?
You wouldn't ask me that if you had read my comments on Skyrim. But Skyrim is full of rich lore and new ideas and visually interesting locations and imagination. The MW games are great at what they do, and I play and enjoy MW2, but it's just totally imaginatively barren. There is nothing new there. It's all about realistic replicas of guns for gun-nuts to spunk over, and by "paranoid" I mean that it's all WW3 bullshit. Russians invading America? Russians invading Europe (the whole of Europe, all at once, "realistic shooter" my arse)? It's nonsense, catering to sexually frustrated teens.Jakub324 said:... And who is paranoid? If that was true, there would be no squishy Americans to kill. Activision exist to make money and they have a formula that works very very well without too much change, so why would they endanger that in favour of pleasing the whiney minority? Do you hate everything that's successful? Does an intellectual property have to crawl around in the gutters before you'll respect it?Hides His Eyes said:Ok, I was wrong. It's still a bunch of paranoid neo-con nonsense though.Jakub324 said:Or Somalis. Or Sierra Leoneans, Afghans, Brazilians and Americans (and, if we include Black Ops, Cubans and Vietnamese and British). I think you should either play the game you claim to hate or look up the word 'invariably'.Hides His Eyes said:Yes but the people you kill are invariably Russians.Jakub324 said:Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villainsThen maybe shooters shouldn't go; Modern Warfare 2 had a predominantly British-American task force solving the USA's problems, and Modern Warfare 3 has two British soldiers running around like James Bond even after the US declared them international criminals.Hides His Eyes said:Personally I'd like the modern military shooter genre to fade away now, it outstayed its welcome a long time ago. But if it refuses to go out with dignity, then I agree it could at least try and be a little more inventive and relevant, and stop having its gamers shoot Russians. How about a multi-cultural force of mercenaries?Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villains
As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
A twist concerning atlas? Ooooooh boy how have you managed to not find that out for so long? DW, I won't spoil it for you :LHides His Eyes said:Atlas from Bioshock? However, I haven't finished that game so if there's some twist concerning him, please don't tell me. But yeah, I can see how the Irish get treated even worse than us English.MetalDooley said:Pfft at least ye get to be evil.Irish characters always seem to be your stereotypical sweary violent drunks(see Irish in RDR AND Sean Devlin in The Saboteur for a few recent examples off the top of my head).I genuinely cannot think of a single game that has an Irish character who is just a normal personHides His Eyes said:As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
He's definitely Irish.someonehairy-ish said:A twist concerning atlas? Ooooooh boy how have you managed to not find that out for so long? DW, I won't spoil it for you :LHides His Eyes said:Atlas from Bioshock? However, I haven't finished that game so if there's some twist concerning him, please don't tell me. But yeah, I can see how the Irish get treated even worse than us English.MetalDooley said:Pfft at least ye get to be evil.Irish characters always seem to be your stereotypical sweary violent drunks(see Irish in RDR AND Sean Devlin in The Saboteur for a few recent examples off the top of my head).I genuinely cannot think of a single game that has an Irish character who is just a normal personHides His Eyes said:As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
Also is he even irish? I swear I remember him sounding English. But then I haven't played Bioshock in aaaages, might be thinking about Ryan or something.
I would like to know how T,Hawk is Racist, because last I checked the average portrayal of Mexicans was brown short lazy drunkards that wore a big ass sombrero and had awesome mustachos.Salad Is Murder said:The Dead Rising and Street Fighter games have always seemed pretty racist to me...maybe Capcom games as a general rule. I mean, come on...Dee Jay, T.Hawk for realsies Capcom?
Pot, meet kettle.Cronq said:I wish people had something better to do than just scrutinize everything in society and looks for ways to be offended. People who are offended offend me.
Oh, it's no revolution, but WW3 was very exciting, wasn't it? Like I said, though, if I made a game that sold millions, I wouldn't want to change it too much. Activision have £30m+ riding on these games and they want that money to be safe, and they've got that down to a science.Hides His Eyes said:You wouldn't ask me that if you had read my comments on Skyrim. But Skyrim is full of rich lore and new ideas and visually interesting locations and imagination. The MW games are great at what they do, and I play and enjoy MW2, but it's just totally imaginatively barren. There is nothing new there. It's all about realistic replicas of guns for gun-nuts to spunk over, and by "paranoid" I mean that it's all WW3 bullshit. Russians invading America? Russians invading Europe (the whole of Europe, all at once, "realistic shooter" my arse)? It's nonsense, catering to sexually frustrated teens.Jakub324 said:... And who is paranoid? If that was true, there would be no squishy Americans to kill. Activision exist to make money and they have a formula that works very very well without too much change, so why would they endanger that in favour of pleasing the whiney minority? Do you hate everything that's successful? Does an intellectual property have to crawl around in the gutters before you'll respect it?Hides His Eyes said:Ok, I was wrong. It's still a bunch of paranoid neo-con nonsense though.Jakub324 said:Or Somalis. Or Sierra Leoneans, Afghans, Brazilians and Americans (and, if we include Black Ops, Cubans and Vietnamese and British). I think you should either play the game you claim to hate or look up the word 'invariably'.Hides His Eyes said:Yes but the people you kill are invariably Russians.Jakub324 said:Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villainsThen maybe shooters shouldn't go; Modern Warfare 2 had a predominantly British-American task force solving the USA's problems, and Modern Warfare 3 has two British soldiers running around like James Bond even after the US declared them international criminals.Hides His Eyes said:Personally I'd like the modern military shooter genre to fade away now, it outstayed its welcome a long time ago. But if it refuses to go out with dignity, then I agree it could at least try and be a little more inventive and relevant, and stop having its gamers shoot Russians. How about a multi-cultural force of mercenaries?Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villains
As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
Do I hate it because it's popular? No. But I hate the fact that it is so popular. It just doesn't deserve it, simple as that.
In. My. Opinion.
Jakub324 said:Oh, it's no revolution, but WW3 was very exciting, wasn't it? Like I said, though, if I made a game that sold millions, I wouldn't want to change it too much. Activision have £30m+ riding on these games and they want that money to be safe, aHides His Eyes said:You wouldn't ask me that if you had read my comments on Skyrim. But Skyrim is full of rich lore and new ideas and visually interesting locations and imagination. The MW games are great at what they do, and I play and enjoy MW2, but it's just totally imaginatively barren. There is nothing new there. It's all about realistic replicas of guns for gun-nuts to spunk over, and by "paranoid" I mean that it's all WW3 bullshit. Russians invading America? Russians invading Europe (the whole of Europe, all at once, "realistic shooter" my arse)? It's nonsense, catering to sexually frustrated teens.Jakub324 said:... And who is paranoid? If that was true, there would be no squishy Americans to kill. Activision exist to make money and they have a formula that works very very well without too much change, so why would they endanger that in favour of pleasing the whiney minority? Do you hate everything that's successful? Does an intellectual property have to crawl around in the gutters before you'll respect it?Hides His Eyes said:Ok, I was wrong. It's still a bunch of paranoid neo-con nonsense though.Jakub324 said:Or Somalis. Or Sierra Leoneans, Afghans, Brazilians and Americans (and, if we include Black Ops, Cubans and Vietnamese and British). I think you should either play the game you claim to hate or look up the word 'invariably'.Hides His Eyes said:Yes but the people you kill are invariably Russians.Jakub324 said:Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villainsThen maybe shooters shouldn't go; Modern Warfare 2 had a predominantly British-American task force solving the USA's problems, and Modern Warfare 3 has two British soldiers running around like James Bond even after the US declared them international criminals.Hides His Eyes said:Personally I'd like the modern military shooter genre to fade away now, it outstayed its welcome a long time ago. But if it refuses to go out with dignity, then I agree it could at least try and be a little more inventive and relevant, and stop having its gamers shoot Russians. How about a multi-cultural force of mercenaries?Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villains
As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
Do I hate it because it's popular? No. But I hate the fact that it is so popular. It just doesn't deserve it, simple as that.
In. My. Opinion.
Yes they have. They have indeed. Safe, repeatable, financially dependable, totally creatively bankrupt games. Made entirely for profit and nothing else. And if you see anything admirable in that then you have the soul of an earthworm.
I would draw you a Venn diagram showing popularity and quality if I could be bothered.
Yes they have. They have indeed. Safe, repeatable, financially dependable, totally creatively bankrupt games. Made entirely for profit and nothing else. And if you see anything admirable in that then you have the soul of an earthworm.Jakub324 said:Oh, it's no revolution, but WW3 was very exciting, wasn't it? Like I said, though, if I made a game that sold millions, I wouldn't want to change it too much. Activision have £30m+ riding on these games and they want that money to be safe, and they've got that down to a science.Hides His Eyes said:You wouldn't ask me that if you had read my comments on Skyrim. But Skyrim is full of rich lore and new ideas and visually interesting locations and imagination. The MW games are great at what they do, and I play and enjoy MW2, but it's just totally imaginatively barren. There is nothing new there. It's all about realistic replicas of guns for gun-nuts to spunk over, and by "paranoid" I mean that it's all WW3 bullshit. Russians invading America? Russians invading Europe (the whole of Europe, all at once, "realistic shooter" my arse)? It's nonsense, catering to sexually frustrated teens.Jakub324 said:... And who is paranoid? If that was true, there would be no squishy Americans to kill. Activision exist to make money and they have a formula that works very very well without too much change, so why would they endanger that in favour of pleasing the whiney minority? Do you hate everything that's successful? Does an intellectual property have to crawl around in the gutters before you'll respect it?Hides His Eyes said:Ok, I was wrong. It's still a bunch of paranoid neo-con nonsense though.Jakub324 said:Or Somalis. Or Sierra Leoneans, Afghans, Brazilians and Americans (and, if we include Black Ops, Cubans and Vietnamese and British). I think you should either play the game you claim to hate or look up the word 'invariably'.Hides His Eyes said:Yes but the people you kill are invariably Russians.Jakub324 said:Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villainsThen maybe shooters shouldn't go; Modern Warfare 2 had a predominantly British-American task force solving the USA's problems, and Modern Warfare 3 has two British soldiers running around like James Bond even after the US declared them international criminals.Hides His Eyes said:Personally I'd like the modern military shooter genre to fade away now, it outstayed its welcome a long time ago. But if it refuses to go out with dignity, then I agree it could at least try and be a little more inventive and relevant, and stop having its gamers shoot Russians. How about a multi-cultural force of mercenaries?Cyrus Hanley said:There's no love lost for North Korea.GrandmaFunk said:assuming the game is a military shooter, which enemy nation would you find less offensive?mitchc95 said:just a general discussion: something disgustingly offensive in a videogame, stereotypical background charachters, villains or the opposite, whatever that may be, or just something minorly offensive but not outright racist.
my personal picking point: Russians, every second shooter these days has russians as villains
As for the OT, Brits always end up evil or dead (just like in Hollywood films). I'm not much of a patriot but it's really starting to piss me off now.
Do I hate it because it's popular? No. But I hate the fact that it is so popular. It just doesn't deserve it, simple as that.
In. My. Opinion.
Neverwinter Nights (Original and sequel) and the other DnD games are generally good for this. There's a very small amount of 'fantastic racism' as TVTropes puts it, but generally everyone gets along. Cause, there's a plague. Or demons. Or both. Or plague demons.krazykidd said:Orcs that always refer to you as human scum and weakling . Elves that always look down on orcs and think they are brutes and look down on humans because they don't treat nature properly. Humans that look down on everybody because they aren't human. Drawfs thats look down on everyone because they are land dwellers .
Yeah this ticks me off , because no matter what race i choose in a game , racial slurrs are thrown my way because i am part of a different race. I think we need to move on from this , this age old definition of what humans , orcs , drawfs , and elves are like , is starting to get a little stale . Who is going to redefine the races in RPGS? What developper has the balls to do it . I donn't knoe but i wish someone would at least try.