A .5 score would indicate the reviewer thinks the game varies between a 6 game and a 7 game.mentor07825 said:I've noticed something, a lot of people are using the 1 - 10 rating system, while using the dots as well. So we're talking about a rating system that is graded by 1,000 points.
How do you justify a game gets 8.5 instead of a 8.6?
EDIT: Not only that, but the 1 - 10 rating system, without the dots. How do you justify a game gets 7 but not a 6? I've noticed in a lot of reviews there are very rare cases that games get below a 7.
The 5 star method just doesn't have enough room for variation between scores for me personally. I've found that magazines/sites who use that system such as Edge tend to reserve 5 Stars for only the very very best games which leaves the vast majority of games sitting in the 3 and 4 star bracket.mentor07825 said:Nicely answered. Personally I'm in favour of the five star system. I've read an article on, I believe it's either Games(tm) or Edge on the rating system, and I totally agree with what they say. Because of that I base my rating system on the five star method.Faps said:A .5 score would indicate the reviewer thinks the game varies between a 6 game and a 7 game.mentor07825 said:I've noticed something, a lot of people are using the 1 - 10 rating system, while using the dots as well. So we're talking about a rating system that is graded by 1,000 points.
How do you justify a game gets 8.5 instead of a 8.6?
EDIT: Not only that, but the 1 - 10 rating system, without the dots. How do you justify a game gets 7 but not a 6? I've noticed in a lot of reviews there are very rare cases that games get below a 7.
I personally break my scores down in the 3 brackets, 1-4 = Poor, 5-7 = Average and 8-10 = Good. Now I could just review a game by saying Good or Poor but it doesn't really give an indication of how good or bad a game is. Some good games are better than other good games and a number based system allows the reviewer to show this. A .5 mark also allows the reviewer to show that a game might be on the cusp of his or her review boundaries
Still. that was brilliantly answered and the way you go about it seems pretty good.
TundraWolf said:Mine is [PROTOTYPE].
I give it a solid 8/11; it didn't impress me too much with it's gameplay mechanics, but the story is really cool, the intrigue part of the game is a breath of fresh air, and it has a really good open-world concept (even though some of the exploration is buggy as hell).
And yes, I purposefully made it out of 11.