Rate the last game you purchased

KingGolem

New member
Jun 16, 2009
388
0
0
I bought No More Heroes just a couple of days ago, and I must give it an 8.5-9. It's got great gameplay, great characters, and a great story, which are all getting harder to find these days. It avoids a perfect 10 from being a little bit repetitive in between ranked missions, not enough variety in weapons and apparel, and a huge dissapointment that was one ranked mission in the middle of the game, which you probably know about if you have played it to that point.
 

quiet_samurai

New member
Apr 24, 2009
3,897
0
0
Red Faction: Geurilla

I give it 3/5 stars. It looks great and the controls work very well, but for a Red Faction game the story is kind of weak and the misssions all get repetitive and boring after you've completed the same exact quest for the tenth time. But where it shines is the shockingly realistic manner in which you demo buildings and structures. It's totally badass after sneaking into an enemy stronghold and setting up remote charges then detonating them and watching the building implode under it's weight. It's a game where you can really unleash your inner terrorist.
 

Faps

New member
Jul 27, 2008
412
0
0
mentor07825 said:
I've noticed something, a lot of people are using the 1 - 10 rating system, while using the dots as well. So we're talking about a rating system that is graded by 1,000 points.

How do you justify a game gets 8.5 instead of a 8.6?

EDIT: Not only that, but the 1 - 10 rating system, without the dots. How do you justify a game gets 7 but not a 6? I've noticed in a lot of reviews there are very rare cases that games get below a 7.
A .5 score would indicate the reviewer thinks the game varies between a 6 game and a 7 game.

I personally break my scores down in the 3 brackets, 1-4 = Poor, 5-7 = Average and 8-10 = Good. Now I could just review a game by saying Good or Poor but it doesn't really give an indication of how good or bad a game is. Some good games are better than other good games and a number based system allows the reviewer to show this. A .5 mark also allows the reviewer to show that a game might be on the cusp of his or her review boundaries
 

Link Kadeshi

New member
Oct 17, 2008
392
0
0
Let me see, I have not finished the last game I bought, but I'll say a 7.5 at this point? Oh, and since all the title said was rate, I'm not gonna tell you the game is Final Fantasy XII, because you never asked... HAH!
 

Faps

New member
Jul 27, 2008
412
0
0
mentor07825 said:
Faps said:
mentor07825 said:
I've noticed something, a lot of people are using the 1 - 10 rating system, while using the dots as well. So we're talking about a rating system that is graded by 1,000 points.

How do you justify a game gets 8.5 instead of a 8.6?

EDIT: Not only that, but the 1 - 10 rating system, without the dots. How do you justify a game gets 7 but not a 6? I've noticed in a lot of reviews there are very rare cases that games get below a 7.
A .5 score would indicate the reviewer thinks the game varies between a 6 game and a 7 game.

I personally break my scores down in the 3 brackets, 1-4 = Poor, 5-7 = Average and 8-10 = Good. Now I could just review a game by saying Good or Poor but it doesn't really give an indication of how good or bad a game is. Some good games are better than other good games and a number based system allows the reviewer to show this. A .5 mark also allows the reviewer to show that a game might be on the cusp of his or her review boundaries
Nicely answered. Personally I'm in favour of the five star system. I've read an article on, I believe it's either Games(tm) or Edge on the rating system, and I totally agree with what they say. Because of that I base my rating system on the five star method.

Still. that was brilliantly answered and the way you go about it seems pretty good.
The 5 star method just doesn't have enough room for variation between scores for me personally. I've found that magazines/sites who use that system such as Edge tend to reserve 5 Stars for only the very very best games which leaves the vast majority of games sitting in the 3 and 4 star bracket.

But on the other hand you have the percentage method used in PCGamer which I think is just too much, I mean what makes Half Life 2 1% better than Civ 2?

But each to their own. Review away!
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Well technically Prototype was the last game I bought but since I haven't had any time to play it the last game I bought and played would be Sacred 2. I'll give it a 7/10 (0.5 bonus points for the Blind Guardian quest). That was the best reward I have ever had the pleasure of seeing in a video game.
 

Neotericity

Legal Assassin
May 20, 2009
685
0
0
Saints Row II 9/11... Oh I guess it's not funny anymore

TundraWolf said:
Mine is [PROTOTYPE].

I give it a solid 8/11; it didn't impress me too much with it's gameplay mechanics, but the story is really cool, the intrigue part of the game is a breath of fresh air, and it has a really good open-world concept (even though some of the exploration is buggy as hell).

And yes, I purposefully made it out of 11.
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
Knights in the Nightmare...

An SRPG/Bullet Hell shmup.

Yes it is very strange, very complicated and incredibly brilliant.

I'd give it an 8 due to the learning curve and niche appeal.
 

HellbirdIV

New member
May 21, 2009
608
0
0
I don't remember which one I bought last, Call of Duty World at War or Dead Space.

World At War is fun but at some points a little abusive. It doesn't add that much to the series, but the controls are as smooth as in CoD4 and the bolt-action rifles are as satisfying as they were in CoD2. Easily a 8/10 for Treyarch's little trip back memory lane, because the Bayonettes are just that much fun to use.

Dead Space was my first proper foray into the world of 3rd-person-shooters and I must say, once you got used to the controls, this game was really, really fun. The gameplay was intuitive and fun, the story was amazingly complex and very well written with some great voice-acting, and I found the whole experience to be nothing short of fantastic. Only complaint is that is was too damn short. Ten hours first play-through, downright disappointing. 9/10 for that little failiure.