That made my day.MasochisticMuse said:Plus Rebecca... underarm hair, ew. If I have to shave my shit, so do you, lady.
I think you've misinterpreted "majority" to be a "majority of regional / global population", whereas I believe it refers to "the majority of gamers", or even "the majority of game reviewers". Such is the folly of applying objective research to something as interpretive and subjective as lyrics from a song.CoreKrogoth said:... It was nearly tolerable up until the line, "it feels so good to be in the majority, it feels so good to be a white straight man." I took this as the same thought. I'm very sick of this type of talk and the mentality behind it, so I've decided to show some scientific evidence...
I assume you meant to direct this to the content creators, who each strive to produce content that their audience actually WANTS to see. I think it's a safe bet that none of them is producing content solely for the money, as we generally pick up series based on the quality of content already put into the concept. Every one of our contributors - past, present, and future, has the same mindset to produce content simply because they feel like they have something to share that people will like. I'm sure any one of them will tell you that the only difference money makes is how often they produce their content.CoreKrogoth said:Note to the producers:
You guys keep on producing whatever you think will make you money as long as it doesn't start to inconvenience your audience. (with all due respect and no sarcasm intended)
CaptainCrunch said:I think you've misinterpreted "majority" to be a "majority of regional / global population", whereas I believe it refers to "the majority of gamers", or even "the majority of game reviewers". Such is the folly of applying objective research to something as interpretive and subjective as lyrics from a song.CoreKrogoth said:... It was nearly tolerable up until the line, "it feels so good to be in the majority, it feels so good to be a white straight man." I took this as the same thought. I'm very sick of this type of talk and the mentality behind it, so I've decided to show some scientific evidence...
For example, I would never have guessed that the following song is actually about a boxer losing a match, had the artist not explicitly said something about it outside the context of the song:
One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, out
Everyone is waiting for the light
be afraid, don't be afraid
the sun is shining out of my eyes
it will not set tonight
and the world counts loudly to ten
One
Here comes the sun
Two
Here comes the sun
Three
It is the lightest star of all
Four
Here comes the sun
The sun is shining out of my hands
it can burn, it can blind you all
when it breaks out of the fists
it lays down hotly on the face
it will not set tonight
and the world counts loudly to ten
One
Here comes the sun
Two
Here comes the sun
Three
It is the lightest star of all
Four
Here comes the sun
Five
Here comes the sun
Six
Here comes the sun
Seven
It is the lightest star of all
Eight, nine
Here comes the sun
The sun is shining out of my hands
it can burn, it can blind you
when it breaks out of the fists
it lays down hotly on your face
it lays down painfully on your chest
balance is lost
it lets you go hard to the floor
and the world counts loudly to ten
One
Here comes the sun
Two
Here comes the sun
Three
It is the lightest star of all
Four
And it will never fall from the sky
Five
Here comes the sun
Six
Here comes the sun
Seven
It is the lightest star of all
Eight, nine
Here comes the sun
I assume you meant to direct this to the content creators, who each strive to produce content that their audience actually WANTS to see. I think it's a safe bet that none of them is producing content solely for the money, as we generally pick up series based on the quality of content already put into the concept. Every one of our contributors - past, present, and future, has the same mindset to produce content simply because they feel like they have something to share that people will like. I'm sure any one of them will tell you that the only difference money makes is how often they produce their content.CoreKrogoth said:Note to the producers:
You guys keep on producing whatever you think will make you money as long as it doesn't start to inconvenience your audience. (with all due respect and no sarcasm intended)
If you are instead referring to the Escapist staff, then I think you grossly misinterpret what it means to keep a website running, let alone filled to the brim with high-quality content that anyone can see for FREE. It's our job to find and foster content that you, the audience, likes - the more people like it, the more money we make. The more money we make, the more content we provide that we hope you like.
There's no evil mastermind wringing his hands with glee every time we make a buck off something people don't seem to like that much. Just good ol' fashioned supply and demand.
My use of the "evil mastermind" metaphor is meant to be sarcastic. You don't have to defend him, because an attack was never made in the first place.rebus_forever said:i dont think he said anything about an evil conspiracy/mastermind seems like u explained his point, i mean before u tried to brand him with the crazy stick by saying hes accusing u of being some sort of masonic shadow player.
To be fair... you don't HAVE too... it's just more aesthetically pleasing that you do.MasochisticMuse said:Plus Rebecca... underarm hair, ew. If I have to shave my shit, so do you, lady.
I was thinking the same thing when I heard about this, but after watching the video I think it's more that she just wanted to respond to Yahtzee's raging misogyny and dump on his sarcastic humor than just get views.TheGameXXVII said:i watched it, and, to be truthful, i did not care for it.
and to the people saying that using Yahtzee was a way of getting views, i comepletely agree with you good gents/ladies. if you take a quick look at the past comments for her previous videas, not one had gotten past 200, bar one. now, as soon as she mentions Yahtzee, KACHOW! over 200 comments in just around 5-6 hours.
this little popularity spike won't last, as soon as she goes back to her regular non-Yahtzee videos, watch her comments plummet faster than a man with a lead parachute.
i highly reccomend the song "just can't get enough" ;P i am teasing obviously, the repetition in that song could drive any young child insane! (but seemingly not teenagers, who were entranced by it... least til Justin Bieber released her own repetetive sludge)daltonlaffs said:Ohhhhh, that was so close to being great...
Rebecca, I'm going to be honest: I've never been a fan of your songs. They're too repetitive, mainly, repeating the same chorus line about thirty times in a row at least three times on most occasions. They're not usually clever, either.
This one *almost* made me change my mind... it started out so damn strong, and it was hilarious, clever words and rhyming on par with Yahtzee himself. BUT THEN, you started into the chorus. "Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?..." (repeat)
Please, please, stop doing that to your songs. You would be a pleasure to listen to if it weren't for the repetition.
Ummmmm I just did...just thought you would like to knowriottrio said:i highly reccomend the song "just can't get enough" ;P i am teasing obviously, the repetition in that song could drive any young child insane! (but seemingly not teenagers, who were entranced by it... least til Justin Bieber released her own repetetive sludge)daltonlaffs said:Ohhhhh, that was so close to being great...
Rebecca, I'm going to be honest: I've never been a fan of your songs. They're too repetitive, mainly, repeating the same chorus line about thirty times in a row at least three times on most occasions. They're not usually clever, either.
This one *almost* made me change my mind... it started out so damn strong, and it was hilarious, clever words and rhyming on par with Yahtzee himself. BUT THEN, you started into the chorus. "Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?... Is it ok?..." (repeat)
Please, please, stop doing that to your songs. You would be a pleasure to listen to if it weren't for the repetition.
anyway, i agree with him but would add a little more. I don't think the singing and music style, the one that Rebecca uses for most of the songs i've heard, suits this topic very well. She's got a lovely voice, and the slow (and almost emotional) tune style is well suited to her, but it limits what she can do and the audience she can attract.
Still, repetition and saddening music aside, I still love her, even if she's the opposite of the happy-go-lucky ska bands i usually listen too, she's still very good.
not like anyone cares, who will ever read a post on the 18th/19th page! or on a page past no.1 for that matter >.>
Lol, you try going to a club in a sleeveless dress with bushes stickin' out of your pits, see how many guys want to buy you drinks.Draconalis said:To be fair... you don't HAVE too... it's just more aesthetically pleasing that you do.MasochisticMuse said:Plus Rebecca... underarm hair, ew. If I have to shave my shit, so do you, lady.