Red Dead Redemption is a "Permanent Franchise" Says Take-Two

Steven Bogos

The Taco Man
Jan 17, 2013
9,354
0
0
Red Dead Redemption is a "Permanent Franchise" Says Take-Two


Take-Two also said that it plans to continue the BioShock franchise, despite the closure of Irrational Games.

Red Dead Redemption has become somewhat of an oddity in the game's industry - a hugely popular title from a major publisher that's over four years old and hasn't had a sequel released yet. But, that doesn't mean Take-Two has forgotten about it, as big boss Strauss Zelnick confirmed to Gamespot [http://www.gamespot.com/articles/another-reason-to-believe-red-dead-redemption-2-is-happening/1100-6419966/] that "Red Dead is a permanent franchise" in the same vein as Grand Theft Auto.

He also talked a little about the future of the BioShock franchise, which has kind of been up-in-the-air since the closure of Irrational Games [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/132317-Irrational-Games-to-Close-After-BioShock-Infinite-DLC-Update].

Zelnick said, "We haven't given any color on how you should think about [BioShock] yet except we do believe it's beloved; we think it's important [and] certainly something that we're focused on; something 2K Marin will be responsible for shepherding going forward. I don't want to say much else except to agree with you. I think there's a lot of upside in that franchise."

With E3 coming up around the corner, and some recent rumors suggesting that Take-Two is prepping something to do with Red Dead Redemption, could we possibly see a sequel announced at the event? As for me, as a PC gamer, I'm just hoping we'll finally see a PC port of the original game.

Source: Game Spot [http://www.gamespot.com/articles/another-reason-to-believe-red-dead-redemption-2-is-happening/1100-6419966/]

Permalink
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,768
0
41
Ah, yes, "permanent franchise".

Clearly a sign of great things to come.

Oh, and continuing a series after the people who made it good have moved on. Yes. Excellent. Because we all know that Bioshock 2 was the best entry in that series, right?

[sub][sub]Cue me being quoted by one of those deviant nutcases who really did think B2 was the best of the series.[/sub][/sub]
 

Z of the Na'vi

Born with one kidney.
Apr 27, 2009
5,034
0
0
You know, just because a game hasn't had a sequel in 4 years doesn't necessarily mean it needs one.

Red Dead Redemption didn't go anywhere. You can still go out and buy it right now.
 

DrunkOnEstus

In the name of Harman...
May 11, 2012
1,712
0
0
Zhukov said:
Ah, yes, "permanent franchise".

Clearly a sign of great things to come.

Oh, and continuing a series after the people who made it good have moved on. Yes. Excellent. Because we all know that Bioshock 2 was the best entry in that series, right?

[sub][sub]Cue me being quoted by one of those deviant nutcases who really did think B2 was the best of the series.[/sub][/sub]
I knew my deviant nutcase sense was tingling! But really, we all know System Shock 2 is the best game with "shock" involved, but I honestly do think that Bioshock 2 is the best of that "trilogy". Yes, the story was a critique on the other extreme of the political spectrum, handling socialism and communism with less finesse than the handling of objectivism in 1. But as a game? The drill was freaking awesome, laying traps was so much fun, planning and creating a room of death around a little sister, giving her the "go!" as your security system hacking and traps caused mayhem for all involved. I must also mention the ease of hacking, not having to play "connect the pipes" for the 100th time, and being able to do it from a distance. "Minerva's Den" was also probably the best segment of all three of the "Shock" games.

But I do carry the deviant nutcase label proudly, not enjoying Infinite nearly as much as either of the other 2, as I wasn't very enthralled by a much more linear, regenerating shield, 2 weapon, no hacking manshoot with pseudo-intellectual pretensions.

Before almost everyone punches their monitor in an attempt to break my face, I do realize that the Xcom shooter/Mass Effect Bureau thing doesn't give 2K Marin much stock of trust and faith these days, and a few of their big players left to make empty house exploration simulators. The big thing I want to know is how many Irrational employees that didn't follow Ken ended up at 2K Marin, eager to take a stab at another Bioshock without the delays, cuts, and wackiness that affected Infinite's development.

(Side note: Though I consider it as blasphemous as most people, Bioshock 2's multiplayer probably got more play out of me than any other multiplayer that was inappropriately grafted onto a single-player experience).

Sorry Zhukov, didn't mean to throw that many words at ya : )
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Z of the Na said:
Red Dead Redemption didn't go anywhere. You can still go out and buy it right now.
Unless you're a PC gamer.

But seriously, I'm not even sure how to take this. RDR didn't particularly need a sequel.

Still, I wouldn't mind another game along those lines. Maybe this time we could get a game with controls that aren't crap, though.
 

NuclearKangaroo

New member
Feb 7, 2014
1,919
0
0
"As for me, as a PC gamer, I'm just hoping we'll finally see a PC port of the original game."

amen brother
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
Considering RDR is probably my second favorite game ever, I'm glad they aren't rushing out sequels or anything. It pretty much could stand alone and I'd be happy with that.
That said, I'd welcome a sequel where you played Jack Marston. Hell, give it a strong female protagonist and cover the ups and downs of being a gal in the Wild West. I thought Bonnie MacFarlane was a really interesting, well fleshed-out character. We need more chicks like her in games. My grandmother was born out in the West Australian bush with several miles between neighbours. She was one tough country woman.
 

Rad Party God

Party like it's 2010!
Feb 23, 2010
3,560
0
0

Well, I hope they leave it alone and do it's thing like GTA and not make another sequel for the sake of making it, like Bioshock 2 (not that it sucks or anything, actually it's pretty good).
 

Hadesshade

New member
Jan 11, 2013
12
0
0
We do believe it's beloved
and
I think there's a lot of upside in that franchise
Yes, whilst he is the CEO of Take-Two and has a business to run, there doesn't seem to be much of a reference to them being 'games.' His word selection makes me feel that he sees these as products and money makers than interactive devices of enjoyment.

Maybe I'm reading too much into it, and it may be no different amongst other big publishing companies, but it doesn't seem that higher-ups in the industry really see games in the same way as players do.
 

Konaerix

New member
May 19, 2010
289
0
0
As much as one part of my brain likes the idea of more Red Dead, I have to ask what a potential sequel would even be like.
I mean, what time period would it take place in if redemption was about the passing of the old west? Would it be set before redemption, during John's early days? I'm not sure I like the sound of anything of that sort...
 

gphjr14

New member
Aug 20, 2010
868
0
0
Konaerix said:
As much as one part of my brain likes the idea of more Red Dead, I have to ask what a potential sequel would even be like.
I mean, what time period would it take place in if redemption was about the passing of the old west? Would it be set before redemption, during John's early days? I'm not sure I like the sound of anything of that sort...
Hey just from hearing the dialog of Landon Ricketts I'd love to see a prequel of him. Even though we won't really wonder how his story ends, it'd be nice to see how he got there. Something along the lines of the Lost and the Damned and the Ballad of Gay Tony where characters from RDR like Dutch or Edgar Ross make an appearance as their younger selves would be awesome to see.

As long as they focus primarily on gameplay as well as the story and not so much the obligatory multiplayer
 

Reaper195

New member
Jul 5, 2009
2,055
0
0
Bioshock never really grabbed me as a franchise, but holy christ, Red Dead was amazing. It also had a cheap but disgustingly expansive DLC campaign with the best zombie thing ever. Only headshots kill. It was also filled with some of the best meta jokes about video games and zombies any game has ever tried.

Zhukov said:
Ah, yes, "permanent franchise".

Clearly a sign of great things to come.

Oh, and continuing a series after the people who made it good have moved on. Yes. Excellent. Because we all know that Bioshock 2 was the best entry in that series, right?

[sub][sub]Cue me being quoted by one of those deviant nutcases who really did think B2 was the best of the series.[/sub][/sub]
But..BioShock 2 WAS the best in the series. It made use of the Big Daddy's drill!

Honestly, that was the only reason I consider 2 better than 1. And I fuckin' loath 1 for so many reasons. At least they got the gameplay for the games right for a shooter in Infinite (because 1 and 2 were pretty much shooters, except they wanted to keep the controls more similar to an FPSRPG like System Shock. Which wasn't a shooter).
 

erbkaiser

Romanorum Imperator
Jun 20, 2009
1,137
0
0
I will be very surprised if at E3 they do not announce either a PC port of RDR, or Red Dead thRee.

If a sequel, I hope it will be a sequel like Revenge was to Revolver, as in, no story connection at all, just set in the same mythical wild west universe. John Marston's story is fully told, and IMO we do not need to see more of him (or his clone Jack).
 

josemlopes

New member
Jun 9, 2008
3,950
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Z of the Na said:
Red Dead Redemption didn't go anywhere. You can still go out and buy it right now.
Unless you're a PC gamer.

But seriously, I'm not even sure how to take this. RDR didn't particularly need a sequel.

Still, I wouldn't mind another game along those lines. Maybe this time we could get a game with controls that aren't crap, though.
It doesnt need one but to me another western like it would be much apreciated in the future (not exactly right now, give the "next" gen a few more years).

For all purposes it doesnt need to be related at all to John Marston, it just needs to be an open world game in a western setting.
 

Ten Foot Bunny

I'm more of a dishwasher girl
Mar 19, 2014
807
0
0
Konaerix said:
As much as one part of my brain likes the idea of more Red Dead, I have to ask what a potential sequel would even be like.
I mean, what time period would it take place in if redemption was about the passing of the old west? Would it be set before redemption, during John's early days? I'm not sure I like the sound of anything of that sort...
Or Red Dead Revolution, where you play as John's grandfather, who was also Ben Franklin's sidekick. ;)

And why stop there? AssCreed is doing well on the high seas, so how about Red Dead Blunderbuss?
 

Roofstone

New member
May 13, 2010
1,641
0
0
Red Dead Revolver had nothing to do with John. So I guess if Red Dead gets the GTA treatment of new stuff every time? Sure, go nuts. Looking forward to the next one!
 

SonicWaffle

New member
Oct 14, 2009
3,019
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
But seriously, I'm not even sure how to take this. RDR didn't particularly need a sequel.

Still, I wouldn't mind another game along those lines. Maybe this time we could get a game with controls that aren't crap, though.
With any luck it will be a "sequel" in the same vein as GTA; less a direct story continuation and more a series of games set within the same kind of world. I'd happily play that, even though I think the story of the Marstons is effectively done with.
 

Riff Moonraker

New member
Mar 18, 2010
944
0
0
While I am looking forward to seeing what Microsoft has to say at E3 this year, and I am hoping for some really awesome surprises (Crackdown 3, I am looking at you!) I honestly think that a new Red Dead Redemption game would send me over the edge in a really good way. My fingers are crossed for this one!
 

GundamSentinel

The leading man, who else?
Aug 23, 2009
4,448
0
0
TizzytheTormentor said:
Honestly, I would prefer Red Dead Redemption not getting a direct sequel (it ended perfectly) but I would love to see the series continue, because its fun as can be.
Particularly as RDR was very much an end-of-an-era story. A prequel in the heyday of the West I would really love to see, on the other hand.