Timotei said:
It's just too bad Fox isn't. There are infinitely many more attractive women in the field of acting with more truck loads more experience in acting than a girl who has gotten this far based almost solely on her tits and ass. But even then, there are female actors who are hired for that same exact reason and still possess much better acting abilities than Fox.
Your argument is practically invalid. What makes or breaks a movie are the people who perform in it. Would Pulp Fiction have been the same without Samuel L. Jackson? Would There Will Be Blood have been different without Daniel Daye Lewis? Would the original Batman have been a bust without Jack Nicholson's absolutely over-the-top, crazy ass attitude that captured the eccentricities of the Joker so well?
But it's all down to personal opinion! I fucking hated the Dark Knight. It's only redeeming feature was the 10 second shot of Cillian Murhpy being amazing and the rest was annoying bollocks that dragged on forever.
Just because you think Megan Fox isn't hot, doesn't mean you're right. Your argument is invalid too for the same reasons as mine.
And yeah man, of course Pulp Fiction, There Will Be Blood (which was also shit) and Batman Begins would've been different, but not necessarily bad. Actors don't make movies, directors do in my own humble opinion. An actor is there to do what other people have already set out for them. Of course there's talent involved. Could I go out and act as well as them? Shit no I couldn't, but they don't make the parts, they just play them.
