Remains of Apocalyptic Plague Unearthed in Egypt

Rhykker

Level 16 Scallywag
Feb 28, 2010
814
0
0
Remains of Apocalyptic Plague Unearthed in Egypt



Archaeologists have uncovered the remains of an ancient Egyptian epidemic so terrible that it is believed to have contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire.

In the Funerary Complex of Harwa and Akhimenru in the ancient city of Thebes, the Italian Archaeological Mission to Luxor (MAIL) found bodies covered in a layer of lime, a substance historically used as a disinfectant, as well as a giant bonfire containing human remains in which plague victims were cremated.

The remains were dated based on pottery to the third century A.D., during which a series of epidemics today known as the "Plague of Cyprian" ravaged the Roman Empire. Saint Cyprian, a bishop who believed the plague signaled the end of the world, described the grisly effects of the epidemic. "The bowels, relaxed into a constant flux, discharge the bodily strength a fire originated in the marrow ferments into wounds of the fauces (an area of the mouth)," he wrote in Latin in a work called "De mortalitate." The "intestines are shaken with a continual vomiting, the eyes are on fire with the injected blood," he wrote, adding that "in some cases the feet or some parts of the limbs are taken off by the contagion of diseased putrefaction..."

The plague "according to some sources killed more than 5,000 people a day in Rome alone," wrote Francesco Tiradritti, director of the MAIL, in the latest issue of Egyptian Archeology. According to modern day scientists, the plague may have been a form of measles or smallpox, and it contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire. "It killed two Emperors, Hostilian in A.D. 251 and Claudius II Gothicus in A.D. 270," wrote Tiradritti. It is "a generally held opinion that the 'Plague of Cyprian' seriously weakened the Roman Empire, hastening its fall."

During the H1N1 scare, it was said that we are overdue for a pandemic. Do you believe we're prepared to survive such an event with minimal casualties, or do you think a plague could bring our modern world to its knees?

Permalink
 

Rhykker

Level 16 Scallywag
Feb 28, 2010
814
0
0
"Do you believe we're prepared to survive such an event with minimal casualties".

no[footnote]except for the Israelis ;)[/footnote]

in fact if we suffered a real pandemic we'd probably nuke a few brown people countries just for good measure...

our system is in no state to deal with real tangible problems.

it's custom made to make answering one question/problem last decades...

that and peddle us shit...which we'd no doubt buy, get no protection from and then die anyway...

this is why you all should have read World War Z before it became a shitty Brad Pitt movie that makes people who did read it wonder why he paid for the book rights...
 

Remus

Reprogrammed Spambot
Nov 24, 2012
1,698
0
0
I'd call it a "population correction" if an event of this nature was to happen in the modern age. Not to be cruel, but that would be the end result - a huge decrease in human population, easing the stress we've placed on natural resource acquisition and misuse. It will almost have to happen at some point unless we suddenly start colonizing other planets or build an Elysium-style spacestation.
 

rasputin0009

New member
Feb 12, 2013
560
0
0
Wait, how come this is the first time I'm hearing about a plague helping destroy the Roman Empire? I love history and have read a lot, but I don't remember this. Maybe I simply forgot...

Sleekit said:
in fact if we suffered a real pandemic we'd probably nuke a few brown people countries just for good measure...
Our white people countries are hilariously able to disregard all the lives in brown people countries. There might be a couple weeks of hesitation, but as a group, we'll overcome the empathy soon enough.

Sleekit said:
this is why you all should have read World War Z before it became a shitty Brad Pitt movie that makes people who did read it wonder why he paid for the book rights...
Damn, that was a shitty movie. I never read the book, but I'm sure its plot wasn't as much of a clusterfuck as that movie's was.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Remus said:
I'd call it a "population correction" if an event of this nature was to happen in the modern age. Not to be cruel, but that would be the end result - a huge decrease in human population, easing the stress we've placed on natural resource acquisition and misuse. It will almost have to happen at some point unless we suddenly start colonizing other planets or build an Elysium-style spacestation.
Aaaaand once again I get to point out that the UN has predicted population stabilization of 8.1 to 10 billion, with a possible collapse down to 6 billion by the end of the twenty first century, so please stop repeating this drivel as if it's fact and not unlikely speculation.

OT: Insert Bible reference here. I really don't envy people who find these things, it's gotta be a massive scare.
 

Mr.Mattress

Level 2 Lumberjack
Jul 17, 2009
3,646
0
0
Woah woah woah, a Plague that literally killed 5,000 people a day and we discovered evidence of it's existence, IE, the Skulls of former Victims?!

First, what are they doing in Egypt right now? That's not safe.

Second of all, do you really want to find something like this? Who knows how long this disease could be alive for on non-living things! They might all become carriers or infected with this stuff!

Still, I guess it's a cool finding. I never heard of this Plague though. To Wikipedia!
 

ThePurpleStuff

New member
Apr 30, 2010
424
0
0
I remember the story of some woman librarian finding an envelope in an old dictionary during work one day. That contained old smallpox flakes, or something like that, I can't remember exactly. That was years and years ago, very old, I doubt them uncovering this would make any difference, since that disease probably died out if it was covered off with lime or burned out.

I think though, despite our technology and better medicine, we wouldn't handle a world wide plague very well. Our luck, all the major scientists or people that could help make such a cure would get infected and die due to outside sources like... other people. People would lose their minds, go insane and cause as much havoc as possible since, they figure they're going to die anyway, might as well make the most of it. That was one of my jokes back during the whole 2012 nonsense. The apocalypse won't really happen, but we'll all die from eachother's own paranoia and want for the destruction or other selfish crap.

You never know until its too late.
 

Rhykker

Level 16 Scallywag
Feb 28, 2010
814
0
0
rasputin0009 said:
Damn, that was a shitty movie. I never read the book, but I'm sure its plot wasn't as much of a clusterfuck as that movie's was.
the book is genius. seriously if you read books at all consider reading that one.

it's not just about zombies.
 

Remus

Reprogrammed Spambot
Nov 24, 2012
1,698
0
0
lacktheknack said:
Remus said:
I'd call it a "population correction" if an event of this nature was to happen in the modern age. Not to be cruel, but that would be the end result - a huge decrease in human population, easing the stress we've placed on natural resource acquisition and misuse. It will almost have to happen at some point unless we suddenly start colonizing other planets or build an Elysium-style spacestation.
Aaaaand once again I get to point out that the UN has predicted population stabilization of 8.1 to 10 billion, with a possible collapse down to 6 billion by the end of the twenty first century, so please stop repeating this drivel as if it's fact and not unlikely speculation.

OT: Insert Bible reference here. I really don't envy people who find these things, it's gotta be a massive scare.
Once again? I don't recall you correcting me on this topic before, probably because I've never been in or read discussions about plagues prior. I'm atheist btw, so if there's some inferrence that my statement is somehow related to religion, I assure you it's not.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Remus said:
lacktheknack said:
Remus said:
I'd call it a "population correction" if an event of this nature was to happen in the modern age. Not to be cruel, but that would be the end result - a huge decrease in human population, easing the stress we've placed on natural resource acquisition and misuse. It will almost have to happen at some point unless we suddenly start colonizing other planets or build an Elysium-style spacestation.
Aaaaand once again I get to point out that the UN has predicted population stabilization of 8.1 to 10 billion, with a possible collapse down to 6 billion by the end of the twenty first century, so please stop repeating this drivel as if it's fact and not unlikely speculation.

OT: Insert Bible reference here. I really don't envy people who find these things, it's gotta be a massive scare.
Once again? I don't recall you correcting me on this topic before, probably because I've never been in or read discussions about plagues prior. I'm atheist btw, so if there's some inferrence that my statement is somehow related to religion, I assure you it's not.
No, I've just fussed about the whole "We're going to overpopulate the Earth" thing a lot recently, and it's getting old.
 

Rhykker

Level 16 Scallywag
Feb 28, 2010
814
0
0
ThePurpleStuff said:
I remember the story of some woman librarian finding an envelope in an old dictionary during work one day. That contained old smallpox flakes, or something like that, I can't remember exactly. That was years and years ago, very old, I doubt them uncovering this would make any difference, since that disease probably died out if it was covered off with lime or burned out.

I think though, despite our technology and better medicine, we wouldn't handle a world wide plague very well. Our luck, all the major scientists or people that could help make such a cure would get infected and die due to outside sources like... other people. People would lose their minds, go insane and cause as much havoc as possible since, they figure they're going to die anyway, might as well make the most of it. That was one of my jokes back during the whole 2012 nonsense. The apocalypse won't really happen, but we'll all die from eachother's own paranoia and want for the destruction or other selfish crap.

You never know until its too late.
I imagine we'll handle it about as well as we handled the spanish flu during 1918-1920. It was world wide, infected around 500 million and killed somewhere around 50 to 100 million of them. This during the end of world war 1 no less at that. So I don't think there'd be much of a difference in reaction unless the disease somehow had 100% kill rate.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Remus said:
I'd call it a "population correction" if an event of this nature was to happen in the modern age. Not to be cruel, but that would be the end result - a huge decrease in human population, easing the stress we've placed on natural resource acquisition and misuse. It will almost have to happen at some point unless we suddenly start colonizing other planets or build an Elysium-style spacestation.
Well the whole Zalem/Elysium concept likely wouldn't work out too well because it would take too many resources to build and maintain, you'd need to have resources coming in from space (asteroid mining or whatever) and if your doing that, you might as well just have space colonies. Elysium was intended mostly as a (rather bad) metaphor. Battle Angel, where Zalem is from (and what probably inspired Elysium) had a bit more going on, as the whole "social divide" thing was an illusion, something else was going on entirely.... I actually watched "Elysium" expecting a similar final "zinger" showing that everything you were lead to believe was inaccurate, but that never happened.

That said a massive plague wiping out the majority of humanity would be a good thing, providing the survivors are able to unify into one government/culture nowadays, and institute population control to keep the numbers down, expanding our population only as our available resources also increase (space colonies, etc...). An event of some sort, plague, disaster, etc... is how a lot of the backstory in science fiction series begins to explain how humanity got together and formed an earth government. It would mean my own calls for a massive world war simply for the purposes of unification and population reduction wouldn't be necessary. A disaster like a plague is more "antiseptic" in the eyes of history as nobody can really be blamed for that.

Overall though, groups like the CDC have a handle on things to a point well beyond the romans. In the case of an emergency like this, the CDC has incredible amounts of emergency power, which is why they figure so heavily into conspiracy theories and related fiction. For all the doomsday scenarios people have come up with involving diseases, counter-scenarios have been devised, albeit many of them are quite extreme and unpleasant. Chances are if we ever saw a real "extinction level event" type plague moving it would probably be recognized, and we'd probably wind up burning down and/or nuking our own cities, as well as entire nations believed to be responsible for the infection. Indeed someone's earlier comments about "nuking a few countries full of brown people" is actually fairly accurate as some hypothetical plans I've heard (apparently having been leaked publically) encourage specifically that, albeit without the racial angle. Basically it's believed that if a plague like that was to get going it's most likely to originate in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America based on the plagues and such we've seen. Part of our missile deployment is apparently set up specifically (via countries hosting missile bases) to respond to such a call. Likewise one of the reasons why
the US allegedly has so many missiles stored in the middle of the country in the so called "flyover states" (leading to the old jokes about siloes in corn fields and the like) is that in the case of a plague-event we're prepared to scotch either, or both, major coastlines. The idea basically being that if we say had something nasty ravaging say Asia, and then found reports in California, unlike the movies where they screw things up worse by attempting a conventional quarantine, the government might very well just nuke the offending areas, and then pretty much level California. Of course we're talking something that is an "apocalypse" type plague here that is recognized, not your general nasty/lethal infection. Hence we're talking extreme measures. The point here being that the US, and probably a lot
of the civilized world that we coordinate with on such matters, might kill hundreds of millions of people, but you wouldn't see the same levels of decimation, at least by the %s (more people being alive today means of course that in absolute terms more people would die).

Of course the above doesn't apply to man made plagues, supernatural events (if anyone wants to make that kind of argument, but I'm not going there), or other assorted things. See, if you were going to say set off a plague like this intentionally you'd want something that isn't as dramatic and works as a slow burn so people won't be able to react that way and say decide "we'll snuff California and The East Coast to save the rest of the US" or whatever else. The idea being that by the time people realize the threat it will have already spread fairly evenly making even the most extreme attempts at containment impossible.

The point here is that I don't think it could go down like it did in The Ancient World. If we did suddenly see a plague decimating people like that, I'd immediately say a human hand would need to be involved in it.... or a supernatural cause (for those who make such arguments). I mention the supernatural aspect of things simply because while it was likely just superstitious people at the time dealing with what they couldn't understand, there have long been arguments that some of those plagues were brought about by divine retribution, curses, or whatever else. The arguments typically being made that they people back then had a better understanding of what they were dealing with than we give them credit for, and some of the worst plagues managed to survive and spread despite things that should have ended the threat (entire villages, towns, etc... being burned etc...).
 

Toadfish1

New member
May 28, 2013
204
0
0
You guys do know the CDC exists solely for the purpose of making sure something like this doesn't happen, right?
 

Kaymish

The Morally Bankrupt Weasel
Sep 10, 2008
1,256
0
0
my mum works for the ministry of health here and i remember her telling my brother and i one night after she got home from work when the whole Mexican swine flu i think it was, was going on, about how many procedures and things were in place to stop any sort of massive out break the swine flu thing got treated like a bit of a dry run and no one really realised what can be brought to bear on a deadly bacteria or virus when its really bad. we have massive cool stores around the country that were dedicated to the beef and lamb industry have been converted into morgues just to store plague bodies and keep them on ice until it can be sorted out there the airports can be closed and the only way in and out of an island country like mine is by air and sea and ships can be quarantined and burnt airports can be closed
 

NuclearKangaroo

New member
Feb 7, 2014
1,919
0
0
given our knowledge of germs virus and other agents capable of intiating a pandemic, as well as they way they can infect people, yes we are prepared for a pandemic, if we cant developet a cure or vaccine we could atleast take some preventive meansures
 

AngloDoom

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,461
0
0
I think we'd do pretty good. The average person on the street understands infection control a lot better than the average ancient Egyptian person would have done (i.e. that disease isn't caused by bad smells/gods) and we've already done pretty fantastic at minimising the risks that preciously horrendous pathogens caused us.

I don't understand why everyone thinks the world would go to shit and everyone would start nuking Pakistan because someone has ebola. I know it's cool to think we're a stupid, evil species but - I don't know about anyone else - I can't think of a species more clever and charitable than us.
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
lacktheknack said:
OT: Insert Bible reference here. I really don't envy people who find these things, it's gotta be a massive scare.

Not if I know archaeologists and historians. I'm doing a degree in history, and one of my modules was on the Black Death. My reaction when I saw this post wasn't dread, or sympathy, or any of that, it was sheer excitement at learning about this. Plagues are fascinating, and however morbid it might seem, I think any academic around this discovery may have wet themselves a little bit at this find.
 

CriticalMiss

New member
Jan 18, 2013
2,024
0
0
Mr.Mattress said:
Who knows how long this disease could be alive for on non-living things! They might all become carriers or infected with this stuff!
If there is something that can survive being buried in a desert after being burned... I say we make it our new leader and hope it is merciful. All glory to our new microbial overlords!
 

Megalodon

New member
May 14, 2010
781
0
0
Toadfish1 said:
You guys do know the CDC exists solely for the purpose of making sure something like this doesn't happen, right?
So much this. The probable reason we're 'overdue' for a serious plague is precisely because of organisations like the WHO and CDC, as well as that whole 'modern medicine' thing. A global pandemic ala 1918 is highly unlikely in the modern age. Although with the media being what it is, there'd probably only need to be a dozen or so deaths worldwide for a disease to be heralded as an extinction level disaster.