Yeah but they were british so that accounts for it all.dragonslayer32 said:Wow, that is pretty cool. That mission was one of the most unrealistic, you know, 2 guys take on hundreds of enemies but this makes it a little bit better.
Yeah but they were british so that accounts for it all.dragonslayer32 said:Wow, that is pretty cool. That mission was one of the most unrealistic, you know, 2 guys take on hundreds of enemies but this makes it a little bit better.
True, I didn't think of that...Captain Pancake said:Yeah but they were british so that accounts for it all.dragonslayer32 said:Wow, that is pretty cool. That mission was one of the most unrealistic, you know, 2 guys take on hundreds of enemies but this makes it a little bit better.
Umm... what? I think you quoted the wrong person there.Daedalus1942 said:Screw Call of Duty.Zhukov said:Umm... I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.
They made a level set in the town Prypiat. (A good idea incidentally.) So they made that level look like the actual town.
And of course they included the ferris wheel. It's the landmark of Prypiat. Arguably even more recognisable then the actual Chernobyl reactor building. Not including that ferris wheel would be like making a game set in Paris without including the Eiffel Tower.
Stalker was way more accurate and they recreated the entire fucking town, not just the amusement park bit, and in Shadow of Chernobyl, you can walk around and in nearly every single building in Pripiat. i wish everyone would shutup about Call of Duty.
Stalker did it better.
-Tabs<3-
Background radiation is now rather low as they cleaned up the place after the accident and 24 years gives the isotopes a lot of time to decay. It's still not safe to live there permanently, but for a short visit, it won't be worse than an intercontinental flight.Caliostro said:It's kinda depressing how many people apparently didn't know UKRAINE was a real fucking place.
Did you people drop out of school in 2nd grade or something? ...Seriously...
@OP: Pretty cool. Reminds me of a different set of Prypiat pictures I've seen. Someone else either did the tour or went solo.
Does make me wonder, won't this kind of radiation incur serious health issues on the people that went on this tour?
It's not so much a series, just one documentary. Quite interesting actually, but nothing you don't really expect already. Places like this are so fascinating in that they show what could only be theorised so far. Documentaries like that are one thing, places like this actually existing and visiting them is even better. Well, better...you get what I mean.Internet Kraken said:Yeah, I saw some commercials for that. I believe it was called "Life after humans" or something like that. It looked interesting, but I wouldn't watch it for some reason. I think it's because it was on the History channel, and most of the shows on the History channel are complete bullshit.AwesomeFerret said:There's actually an entire TV series all about what would happen if people up and vanished without warning. It shows what would happen to all the mega structures, reactors, power plants, wildlife and farm animals among other things without people around. I don't remember what it was called, but its pretty damn cool.Internet Kraken said:Pripyat is a very interesting place. It's a city that's been abandoned, but at time of evacuation the city itself was intact. It hadn't been bombed or burned or anything else that would due major damage to the structures of the city. Radiation is obviously deadly to us but it doesn't destroy concrete. So when you look at Pripyat, you see a city that has only been destroyed by the ravages of time. Like what would happen if humans just vanished one day, and everything we built was left to decay and crumble.
Cheers.Thedutchjelle said:Background radiation is now rather low as they cleaned up the place after the accident and 24 years gives the isotopes a lot of time to decay. It's still not safe to live there permanently, but for a short visit, it won't be worse than an intercontinental flight.
The most dangerous parts are the ones that never got cleaned. For instance, the Red Forest (called that was as all the leaves died after the accident, which was in spring) was bulldozed and the trees were buried underground. The radiation levels in the forest are now very high - in some places it's the equivalent of getting a chest X-ray every hour.
I didn't quote the wrong person. It wasn't aimed at you, it was aimed at everyone making such a fuss about one frigging level when the whole of Stalker is faithfully recreated, from the Cordon, to Pripyat, to Yantar and Chernobyl itself.Zhukov said:Umm... what? I think you quoted the wrong person there.Daedalus1942 said:Screw Call of Duty.Zhukov said:Umm... I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.
They made a level set in the town Prypiat. (A good idea incidentally.) So they made that level look like the actual town.
And of course they included the ferris wheel. It's the landmark of Prypiat. Arguably even more recognisable then the actual Chernobyl reactor building. Not including that ferris wheel would be like making a game set in Paris without including the Eiffel Tower.
Stalker was way more accurate and they recreated the entire fucking town, not just the amusement park bit, and in Shadow of Chernobyl, you can walk around and in nearly every single building in Pripiat. i wish everyone would shutup about Call of Duty.
Stalker did it better.
-Tabs<3-
For the record, I don't particularly like CoD.