Just to be clear, as you and I converse on this, I am not a fanboy of any manufacturer of electronic goods. I own a 360 because I felt its value at the time I purchased it was greater than that of Sony's offering. I only mention this because I want to make certain it is well understood that I am not an enthusiastic supporter of Sony and dislike Microsoft axiomatically. I also looked in detail at the information released for both consoles as the information came out on this website and others, and my comments here are based on that.
With all of that said, it is my, and many others opinions that the system MS was trying to implement was blatant, half-baked garbage that was engineered for the convenience of the publishers, not the consumers. I take form your comment that you do not agree with this assessment of that system, and that's fine. You saw the value proposition of the system and thought it had merit, many others saw the same proposition and thought it was horse-shit. We could argue individual merits and drawbacks, but that subject has been beaten on these forums at length and I think you and I both understand the arguments well, so no need for a retread.
So, those that saw that proposition, not just as a bad product, but as one that was designed to create convenience for the publisher at the cost of the paying customer's experience, are certainly going to bash the company that wanted to implement that system harder for the same issues than its competitor. Is that fair? One could argue that the issues are what they are and both should be viewed as equals. On the other hand, one could also argue that continued punishment of MS for its dirty dealings is warranted because it will continue to send the message that we recognized the BS for what it was, and we will not accept it. Obviously because you liked the value prospect, this continued punishment, or any punishment, may seem unreasonable, but for people like myself who feel like MS was trying to package garbage and sell it as gold, it seems fair. So at the end of the day, I think this is a disagreement based on perspective.