Report: WB Hatching Supergirl TV Series

RossaLincoln

New member
Feb 4, 2014
738
0
0
Report: WB Hatching Supergirl TV Series



This version will apparently differ somewhat from the comics.

DC has even more plans for its comic book television overload, at least according to a report running this afternoon on Deadline Hollywood.

According to Deadline's Nellie Andreeva, Arrow and The Flash executive producer Greg Berlanti is now working to get a TV series based on Supergirl off the ground. Berlanti is reportedly teaming up with No Ordinary Family producer Ali Adler to bring what Deadline says will be "a new interpretation of the the Supergirl character and her story" to tv screens, though no word right now on when such a show will air, or on what network.

Supergirl, first introduced in 1959, has gone through several different incarnations over the years. Originally she was Kara Zor-El, Superman's Kryptonian cousin who also somehow survived the destruction of Krypton. Sent to Earth by her father to be raised by Superman, she develops similar powers (and weaknesses, like Kryptonite). This version of the character died sacrificing herself to save Superman during DC's 1985 crossover event, "Crisis on Infinite Earths". When Superman was rebooted the next year, DC editorial decreed that he should be the only survivor of Kyrpton's destruction and Kara subsequently was not introduced in the new continuity.

A different version of Supergirl was introduced in 1988, this time a clone created by Lex Luthor. This version eventually merged with a human named Linda Danvers, which happens to be the same name used by Kara as her Earthly secret identity, though the two characters were otherwise unrelated. With the New 52, Kara Zor-El has been reintroduced, this time as a more serious, fish-out-of-water character who has some difficulty accepting the destruction of Krypton as fact. She is currently a member of Guy Gardner's Red Lantern Corps.

Say it with Moviebob everybody: Comics are weird.

So what do you think? Personally, the idea of a new interpretation is both interesting and somewhat frustrating. DC has already decided that its TV series are unconnected to the DC Cinematic Universe. As Supergirl has always existed as a female counterpart to Superman, it's a bit weird to think of her having an origin story completely unrelated to the character. On the other hand, since the DCCU isn't related to DC's TV shows, and since The Flash is extremely Silver Age in its tone, we at least can breathe easy knowing this won't be a dark, gritty reinterpretation of the character on par with Batfleck and Superman crying in the rain.

Incidentally, the last attempt to make a live action version of Supergirl was Helen Slater's disastrous 1984 film Supergirl.

Source: Deadline [http://deadline.com/2014/09/supergirl-tv-series-dc-comics-829364/]

Permalink
 

Kmadden2004

New member
Feb 13, 2010
475
0
0
The thing that's really got me scratching my head is the latest update that they haven't actually settled on what they might end up naming this show, and that possible alternate titles for the series include Super and Girl... but not Supergirl?

If that's true, and considering the likes of Arrow (sans the Green) and that previously rumoured Wonder Woman TV show that was apparently going to be named Amazon, then i can't help but get the feeling that WB/DC/CW/whoever-is-in-charge-of-all-this has a perpetual fear of their own characters' brand power.
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
Kmadden2004 said:
The thing that's really got me scratching my head is the latest update that they haven't actually settled on what they might end up naming this show, and that possible alternate titles for the series include Super and Girl... but not Supergirl?

If that's true, and considering the likes of Arrow (sans the Green) and that previously rumoured Wonder Woman TV show that was apparently going to be named Amazon, then i can't help but get the feeling that WB/DC/CW/whoever-is-in-charge-of-all-this has a perpetual fear of their own characters' brand power.
Considering what I have seen of the ill fated Wonder Woman TV pilot, we can only hope they go nowhere near that route. Otherwise, we'll get a Supergirl who has more in common with Batman and Iron Man than Supergirl.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
I do wonder where this could go considering how Supergirl is kinda bound to her relation to Superman in one way or another. I just hope it isn't Smallville all over again. Yech.
 

youji itami

New member
Jun 1, 2014
231
0
0
Aiddon said:
I do wonder where this could go considering how Supergirl is kinda bound to her relation to Superman in one way or another. I just hope it isn't Smallville all over again. Yech.

Yeah why would WB want to do something like Smallville again? 'checks on wikipedia' oh it lasted 10 seasons while internet forum hit firefly lasted 14 episodes hmm.

edit
oh and Serenity lost $20 million as well just like Scott pilgrim vs the world I guess internet forum users are a really terrible audience if you want to make money.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
you know the midriff is where all your vital organs are

....I guess in her case we can make an exception

OT: I kind of like Supergirl, I'd bee somewhat interested though budget constraints would be a thing
 

Falterfire

New member
Jul 9, 2012
810
0
0
I'm okay with a new interpretation, but I hope they actually do stick with enough traits that it's recognizably Supergirl. If she's not Kryptonian and not related to Superman and you aren't going to name the show 'Supergirl' why even bother using Supergirl in the first place? It's not like DC has a shortage of heroes to pick from, so you may as well pick one you'll actually use the trappings of.

On a tangential note: I maintain that the best option here is a Birds of Prey TV show (The last one didn't count since it was terrible) since Oracle is the best superhero ever and we already have TV versions of Black Canary and Huntress (Even if they did push Huntress well over the Moral Event Horizon in Arrow S2).

On an even more unrelated note: My alternate proposal for a female-led superhero TV show is a Raven/Starfire buddy cop show.
 

Covarr

PS Thanks
May 29, 2009
1,559
0
0
Remember when DC made serious superhero cartoons for kids? An entire decade and a half of DCAU. Shit was stellar. Now we've got hyperserious live action garbage like Man of Steel on one end, and ridiculous nonsense like Beware the Batman on the other.

Newsflash: Half the reason the Dark Knight trilogy was so successful was because it was unique. Nobody was doing superheroes the way Christopher Nolan was. But when that's all DC does, it loses its novelty value, and it doesn't hold up against the ones that did it first and better.

P.S. Thanks
 

Nghtgnt

New member
May 30, 2010
124
0
0
youji itami said:
Yeah why would WB want to do something like Smallville again? 'checks on wikipedia' oh it lasted 10 seasons while internet forum hit firefly lasted 14 episodes hmm.

edit
oh and Serenity lost $20 million as well just like Scott pilgrim vs the world I guess internet forum users are a really terrible audience if you want to make money.
The other thing to remember is that it's WB, so unless you are female, age 16-34, you aren't their target audience.
 

Rawbeard

New member
Jan 28, 2010
224
0
0
DC, everytime you try to do something "different than in the comics" remember, Marvel made a shit tonne of money with a movie about a talking racoon and a walking tree. I know you ABSOLUTLY HAVE TO make your movies drab and boring to look at, but at least with TV try something colorful once in a while.
 

UltimatheChosen

New member
Mar 6, 2009
1,007
0
0
Vault101 said:
you know the midriff is where all your vital organs are

....I guess in her case we can make an exception
Well, her skin is presumably far, FAR more durable than any clothing that she could find, so there's probably very little defensive benefit to covering up.

Not that it makes the costume any less ridiculous, but absurdly revealing outfits are unfortunately par for the course when it comes to female superheroes.
 

croc3629

New member
Mar 20, 2011
99
0
0
Fortunately, not even the comics are doing the miniskirt thing anymore, so thats something.

But I would really appreciate if they would give Kara a full body suit in the show as well, instead of the leotard
thing she's sporting now. Would be nice.

Heck, the Smallville comics were not only able to pull that off, but still give her a unique look as well.

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130517134734/smallville/images/0/0f/3050009-smallville%2Bseason%2B11%2Bcover%2B47.png

Not saying it has to be the duster, but please don't do the leotard, and especially don't go back to the skirt. Would be much appreciated.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,140
3,881
118
Eh, as long as she doesn't fly around in a tiny skirt.

Oddly enough, certain Supergirls didn't really have much to do with Superman. Sure, there was a connection and they socialised and stuff, but they could mostly go off and do their own things...weird when she saves the world by herself, would have thought more people would have a stake in that.
 

Bruce

New member
Jun 15, 2013
276
0
0
Sent to Earth by her father to be raised by Superman, she develops similar powers (and weaknesses, like Kryptonite).

Wasn't it the other way round - she was sent to raise Clark but due to an accident only arrived on Earth when he was an adult?
 

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,157
2
3
Country
UK
Wait, she is part of the Red Lantern Corps? Cool! Man I should really try to catch up with the general storyline in the New 52.
 

Grimh

New member
Feb 11, 2009
673
0
0
I actually think it could be kind of interesting if Supergirl becomes the TV universes Superman.
Not in that she'd be the Superman story except she's a girl just that she's the godlike superhero archetype that Superman embodies in the comics.
I don't know, maybe I'm talking crazy talk.
 

remnant_phoenix

New member
Apr 4, 2011
1,439
0
0
RossaLincoln said:
Incidentally, the last attempt to make a live action version of Supergirl was Helen Slater's disastrous 1984 film Supergirl.
So the version of Supergirl that appeared on Smallville doesn't count?
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,140
3,881
118
Bruce said:
Sent to Earth by her father to be raised by Superman, she develops similar powers (and weaknesses, like Kryptonite).

Wasn't it the other way round - she was sent to raise Clark but due to an accident only arrived on Earth when he was an adult?
I think it was just an ambiguous sentence there, talking about what did happen, rather than what was intended.