It won't come in the US Congress because the Supreme Court has ALREADY ruled on it:TiberiusEsuriens said:"Because your games are so addictive, we have helpfully suggested ways to help the game devs make the game worse/less fun."
While this guy may be blowing some hot air, he does give a fair warning.
Everyone knows how concerned the parenting/out-of-touch politicians are. This will undoubtedly come up in congress in the coming years.Andy Chalk said:The study warned that if MMO makers don't do something to address the issue, governments may be forced to legislate usage limits.
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. 08-1448 (2011)
Video games enjoy ALL the protection of the First Amendment meaning that the only censorship option would be under obscenity law which Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) made very narrow.
"Psychological studies purporting to show a connection between exposure to violent video games and harmful effects on children do not prove that such exposure causes minors to act aggressively. Any demonstrated effects are both small and indistinguishable from effects produced by other media."
"Reading Dante is unquestionably more cultured and intellectually edifying than playing Mortal Kombat. But these cultural and intellectual differences are not constitutional ones. Crudely violent video games, tawdry TV shows, and cheap novels and magazines are no less forms of speech than The Divine Comedy ? Even if we can see in them ?nothing of any possible value to society ? they are as much entitled to the protection of free speech as the best of literature."
I should be mention that even California's District Court saw this and stomped the law into the ground before it could even be enacted.
Finally the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (D5 for short) does NOT recognize Video Game addition..so as far as the D5 is concerned it does NOT exist.