Its good that i chose to be "immune" to this disease then, isnt it?
oldtaku said:
Extragorey said:
Anyway, haven't similar predictions been made about WoW? I've yet to see them pan out.
WoW has definitely been experiencing calcification and huge subscriber loss (down to 7M from 12M). But it can take forever to die, especially with nothing better to actively steal them (yes, I'm sure some people will defend their favorite MMORPG as way better than WoW, but to me they're almost all boring variations on proc and press a key, or have other major weaknesses).
Facebook could similarly live on 'forever' till all the old people die. Hell, AOL is still around, and so is AOL dialup service.
to be honest there are plenty of new MMOs coming out that seem to have fanatic following (star citizen anyone?) that may bite into that crowd. it will certainly take long to die, heck, the oldest graphic MMO is still alive and kicking (it came out couple moths before ultima online!), but its been on staedy and slow decline for a long time. i played it for 7 years (ill let that sink in) and the game is on life support by 95% of players being bots competing with other bots.
No MMO is perfect, and neither is WOW, and i think its going to be a MMO thats DIFFERENT from WOW thats going to finally kill it, not a clone that keeps failing to survive a year.
Also the fact that dialup is alive makes me cry.
Falterfire said:
As fun as it is to draw connections between unrelated things, it seems like a poor idea to assume that since one disease matched the pattern of growth and remission seen in one social network that you can apply this to all social networks.
well, the pattern follows for other now dead social networks. thought i agree that corelation does not mean causation.
Owyn_Merrilin said:
I think I've got four or five separate G+ accounts at this point, because they just get tossed in every time you make an account for one of Google's other services, and I make a point of never using it because of how obnoxious they've been about it.
I have been force to conenct to google+ and used same G+ account for all of them (it wasnt a choice, it jsut told me it automatically connected. sigh). i recently actually opened G+ just to see how it looks like there and turns out everything i ever done on google services is posted there with my real name. my reaction was similar to the rage meme.
Elvaril said:
Most people willingly join social media sites because they want to join them. Most people don't willingly infect themselves with the plague. This analogy seems pretty off.
Not necessarely. I use Skype. I hate Skype. The reason i use it is because everyone else in my country use it and for most people that is the ONLY way i can contact them and i NEED to contact them and thus i am forced to use skype. I have been in this skype slavery for 6 years now. If it was up to me, i would move them all to a better service instantly, however i cant. thats why i always put all my other contacts before Skype in hopes they will choose a different service instead. however they always have skype.
So you see, like a disease, facebook can be spread by other people, and you would be infected agasint your will. as been pointed by couple other posters in here as well.
J.McMillen said:
I also like that most of the geeky YouTube channels and personalities I want to follow post there as well.
do they actually do that? because i recently found out that by never entering google+ site i still managed to post hundreds of messages in there somehow because apparently anything i do in any other google service, like youtube, is automatically uploaded there like im some sort of exhibitionist.