Oh, I wasn't questioning that it did exist (obviously it does, or we wouldn't have this equally hilarious and baffling counterpoint), merely observing that the basic laws of the universe should really have prevented a headline like that from ever existing in the first place, and yet, in defiance of all natural law, somebody actually printed it.The_root_of_all_evil said:Front page of the Metro on Friday. Let me see if I can find it.Gildan Bladeborn said:...Rickets. Seriously? Sorry, but the notion that there were ever headlines claiming "Videogames cause Rickets!!" is so mind-bogglingly ridiculous that I'm having trouble processing it.
Edit: http://www.metro.co.uk/news/810028-video-gaming-leads-to-surge-in-rickets
http://e-edition.metro.co.uk/2010/01/22/ to see it in full
and unsurprisingly, another insult from the journalistic sharks...Jaredin said:For once! A positive comment for games from the medical sector!
crotalidian said:I wouldn't mind so much, if the other newspapers didn't print the same sort of stuff day in day out... It's one of the reasons why we get things like the MMR panic.Andy_Panthro said:Dude. Its the Metro.... nuff said
also is anyone else slightly perturbed that the 'UK' based article has an image of a Cricket videogame? Pidgeonholing much?
Sometimes, I wonder...Andy Chalk said:Furthermore, Professor Pearce noted, "The average age of a child with rickets is around 20 months old: Too young to use a keyboard and mouse!"