Review: Infernal (PC)

Recommended Videos

CuddlyCombine

New member
Sep 12, 2007
1,142
0
0
Chances are, you haven't heard of Infernal, or, if you have, it was accompanied by terms such as "sub-par", "mediocre", and "third-rate". While I'm not going to promise to eschew these terms completely from this review, I will also add another adjective to this list; "innovative". I'm not talking groundbreaking, but certainly interesting. In any case, this 2007 PC third-person shooter by Playlogic went unnoticed due to unremarkable graphics and generic shooter gameplay, with only a few redeeming elements.



Meet Ryan Lennox. He's badass, has stubble, and he does not smile. Ever.

In terms of tutorials, you're dumped into the game in a first mission that acts as an introduction to both the game and the setting. You get to control Ryan Lennox, an agent of Etherlight, heaven's modern security force. After being taken off an assignment and then targeted for assassination by your former employers, you get recruited by Abyss, hell's counterpart to Etherlight. Your new boss gifts you with some hellish powers, and then you're sent on a chase to find out why Etherlight has suddenly taken a liking to killing the agents of Hell. Hoo-ah.

Now, this sounds fun - the forces of God and Satan battling it out with M4A1 carbines and missile launchers - and it is, despite being contrived to bits. Lennox is an action hero cliche incarnate, seemingly confined to the vocabulary of one who was educated only in one-liners, and the game paints your opposition and allies as fairly black-and-white; Abyss is misunderstood, while Etherlight is corrupt (this is refreshingly controversial, as making a video game where God is a bastard would probably earn you some scorn from religious groups).

As far as gameplay goes, the standard run-and-gun mechanics apply, though with a few twists. Aside from your boilerplate arsenal - and I mean arsenal, because you can carry every gun in the game at once - of modern weaponry (ranging from useless pistols to mining tools to heavy artillery), every weapon has a secondary fire consisting of an "Infernal" attack. This uses your Infernal power, which functions much like a mana pool, to supercharge every attack and make it substantially more powerful, turning even a pistol into a formidable killing machine. Of course, your Infernal gauge is quickly depleted if you rely too heavily on it, which you don't want to do, given its other uses.



Hold on, HQ, his arm just became a mass of flame, and he's pointing at me. Advise on best course of action, over.

Some of Ryan's abilities do not need Infernal power. He has a 'gravity gun', if you will, which becomes available somewhere around the game's midpoint, allowing for manipulation of objects; also, he can replenish health and restock ammo by 'feeding' on the bodies of fallen Etherlight agents, and lastly, perform stealth rolls to stay unnoticed. Lennox eventually acquires the ability to teleport himself to a location or two for a brief period of time (which also gets slowed to a near stand-still due to the ability). This is actually used in some clever ways; at one point in the game, you will be faced with an enemy type which has only one weak spot, conveniently located on its back. The only way to defeat it is either throw grenades behind it or teleport behind it, and while it turns in slow motion, peck away at the spot until you're victorious. In other more mundane uses, you will have to teleport to a switch to activate it and so forth.

While health is replenished by draining the bodies of fallen enemies, mana is harder to come by. There are two primary ways; either you find an area the game has designated as 'Hell's domain' (dark locales such as sewers or shadowy areas will slowly replenish your mana), or you activate Ryan's 'Infernal Vision' to find packets of health and mana which you can only access through this special mode. However, you will only really need mana; Ryan has the health of a Titan, even on the hardest difficulty, and can soak up gunfire for a considerable length of time. If you find yourself needing a booster, you can generally start draining the numerous, still-warm bodies of those you have slain. This will give you health, and since you replenish health much more quickly than you take damage, you can quite literally allow dozens of enemies to peck away at you while you feast on their comrades to heal yourself.

In this sense, the game is easy. It provides a puzzle here and there, but by no means is it challenging. Firstly, while the number of enemies is supposed to make the game difficult, your healing ability practically makes this work to your favour. The enemies are not difficult to kill. While you seem to require no sustenance but bullets, given your capacity for them, your enemies will give in to their injuries after one or two hits, making Infernal shots generally useless aside for the toughest of foes.



Health packs are for pussies and Gordon Freeman. Real men extract the souls from their enemies.

Where AI is concerned, you'll find your adversaries will redefine the meaning of cannon fodder, marching out into your line of fire even if you've got a steady supply of ammo and have been slaughtering their comrades for the last ten minutes. Needless to say, the AI leaves something to be desired. Sometimes, enemies will quite literally roll for no reason; you may toss a grenade at a soldier one time and he'll hug it like his daughter, while another time, as you're about to pull out a grenade, he'll roll into the nearest wall. This can get amusing, as you'd imagine.

In terms of graphics, the game is decent considering the release date. While nothing in comparison to higher-end releases such as Crysis or Far Cry 2, the fire effects are impressive and can be fun to watch. However, the voice acting is probably what takes the whole metaphorical cake. Lennox, whose lines are already lame due to their monosyllabic nature, is further made laughable by a voice actor who delivers every line with the exact same tone; likewise, the other actors provide for good laughs when delivering their line. Maybe it's the writing, which at times will make the hemispheres of your brain quake in fright and hug each other for support, or maybe the budget ran out when the time came around to cast voice actors, but this is certainly one of the most worst-acted games released in the 21st century.


Teleporting to reach switches becomes part of the daily routine, and it's better on the environment!

Overall, Infernal is fun for a mindless psychotic who doesn't mind having to swim through corpses to reach the game's finale (and don't think I'm overstating for comedic effect, because you will have to clear out more soldiers than have ever fought on the plains of Earth), with standard shooter gameplay and sub-par AI. The only redeeming features may come from the innovative use of powers and some more clever puzzles. Fun for a bit, but I'd only recommend trying it out if you've got ample reserves of patience and a very itchy trigger finger.

Oh, and would anyone mind some creative critique on my writing style and so forth? This is the first review I've ever actually worked on for more than 15 minutes, so it would be appreciated. Thanks.
 

NoNameMcgee

New member
Feb 24, 2009
2,104
0
0
Good, witty review. I liked it. I don't have any particular critique to point out so this makes my post fairly useless, but as someone else who spends a while on some of his reviews I know what it's like if nobody even replies. So there you go. :p

I actually thought this game was pretty fun until about 4 hours in when I sort of lost interest. I didn't pay for it though, so it was fun for a quick blast. It certainly had some style, it was just lacking in substance.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
Oooh, this sounds fun. You might want to mention whatever price it currently is at for the curious.

Also, using some images every few paragraphs is a good tactic. Just ask if you're in the dark on how to do that :D

Other than that, you have a nice style. It needs only a small bit of tweaking here and there. The only real problem of yours seems to be the occasional run-on sentence: watch out for those.

But a very nice review: I can say that I'll be checking this out, for sure.
 

CuddlyCombine

New member
Sep 12, 2007
1,142
0
0
AverageJoe said:
Good, witty review. I liked it. I don't have any particular critique to point out so this makes my post fairly useless, but as someone else who spends a while on some of his reviews I know what it's like if nobody even replies. So there you go. :p
Aw, thanks!

AverageJoe said:
I actually thought this game was pretty fun until about 4 hours in when I sort of lost interest. I didn't pay for it though, so it was fun for a quick blast. It certainly had some style, it was just lacking in substance.
It can be entertaining, or at least somewhat. Aside from the fast-paced sections, I, a cocaine-twitch gamer, started getting bored a few times.

scotth266 said:
Oooh, this sounds fun. You might want to mention whatever price it currently is at for the curious.
I'm not quite sure. I don't think they sell it anymore, because I haven't seen it at Bestbuy or EB Games.

scotth266 said:
Also, using some images every few paragraphs is a good tactic. Just ask if you're in the dark on how to do that :D
I've taken your suggestion and made it a reality; about six images added. I even made them spoilers for that extra bit of courtesy. :D

scotth266 said:
Other than that, you have a nice style. It needs only a small bit of tweaking here and there. The only real problem of yours seems to be the occasional run-on sentence: watch out for those.
I've had this problem since I was first writing at 8. I tend to type like I speak, and while it apparently reads well and has flow, it'll upset anyone who treasures the value of linguistic mechanics. Thank you, though.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
CuddlyCombine said:
Ah, but now you need to mess with the height, quote this to see how it's done:


Also, you can use center tags to format things:

Like this, see? This could be a picture, with a sweet caption below it...​

Also, there soesn't need to be THAT many images. One or two good ones should do the trick: put a image in every three paragraphs, see how that works out.

Here's an example, from one of my reviews. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.107685]
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
CuddlyCombine said:
scotth266 said:
*good advice*
That helps a lot, thanks! :) I've used 4 images instead of your recommended 3-per-paragraph; my apologies, but they're kickass shots.
No problem, the spacing is spot on now. It looks a lot nicer now too: you should have no troubles attracting some more people's attention. Having the images goes a looooooooong way to reducing the OMG HUGE TEXT WALL feeling that people get when they walk into longer reviews.

Only one more thing needs to be done: stick an extra line between pictures and captions, and maybe stick the captions in italics, though that's a personal thing.
 

CuddlyCombine

New member
Sep 12, 2007
1,142
0
0
scotth266 said:
No problem, the spacing is spot on now. It looks a lot nicer now too: you should have no troubles attracting some more people's attention. Having the images goes a looooooooong way to reducing the OMG HUGE TEXT WALL feeling that people get when they walk into longer reviews.

Only one more thing needs to be done: stick an extra line between pictures and captions, and maybe stick the captions in italics, though that's a personal thing.
Damn you for turning my review into a tutorial for making better reviews! Just kidding, I really appreciate it. Hopefully now, when someone sees this, they don't have an allergic reaction to the overdose of Times New Roman on their screen.
 

VTSK

New member
Jun 3, 2008
242
0
0
That was actually an very impressive review, better, as far as I'm concerned, than anything those twats at IGN could or have written. You're very talented, and I don't doubt you could get a career in the reviewing business.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
CuddlyCombine said:
Don't worry about it. There are a lot of long reviews out there: heck, my Max Payne one was pretty long. But trust me, people get pretty verbose here sometimes. As long as you use this sort of formatting, there should be no issues.

Trust me on this: as long as you format well, and write decently, you'll be welcomed here on the reviews section.

And don't worry if comments are scarce, sometimes people won't comment much. Just the way it goes here: it's like fishing :D
 

CuddlyCombine

New member
Sep 12, 2007
1,142
0
0
scotth266 said:
*stuff about stuff*
Well, hopefully I catch a few fish. I'm enrolling in journalism courses for my first year of university next year; I want to develop a style where I can pack in a lot of information while keeping the reader's interest and not droning on for hours.

VTSK said:
That was actually an very impressive review, better, as far as I'm concerned, than anything those twats at IGN could or have written. You're very talented, and I don't doubt you could get a career in the reviewing business.
Hey, thanks a lot! :) Though I don't think I can put up with the rapid-fire nature of something Yahtzee Croshaw puts out (granted, he is a video reviewer).
 

VTSK

New member
Jun 3, 2008
242
0
0
CuddlyCombine said:
scotth266 said:
*stuff about stuff*
Well, hopefully I catch a few fish. I'm enrolling in journalism courses for my first year of university next year; I want to develop a style where I can pack in a lot of information while keeping the reader's interest and not droning on for hours.

VTSK said:
That was actually an very impressive review, better, as far as I'm concerned, than anything those twats at IGN could or have written. You're very talented, and I don't doubt you could get a career in the reviewing business.
Hey, thanks a lot! :) Though I don't think I can put up with the rapid-fire nature of something Yahtzee Croshaw puts out (granted, he is a video reviewer).
Well, being able to spew bile really fast isn't necessary to be a good reviewer. Besides, you need your own style, right?