Rogue Warrior: What was Bethesda thinking?!?

[Wildrow12]

Rouge warrior...wasn't that based on something out of 2000AD?

Actually no. Completely different character, based on self-gratifying stories written by some ex-soldier named Richard Marcinko starring himself (and his penis which he just LOVES to write about). Yeah, his books are utter drek.

Dick Marcinko is a saint!

Actually only his beard was canonized. The rest of him....not so much.

 

[Acidwell]

Name without using google 10 critically bad games that ea have published. Its not that easy.

Yes it is: Fifa 1995 - Fifa 10.
See? Done.
Maybe they weren't all crap, but it stayed the same, that counts as crap for me.

EDIT: Wait a sec... They did publish those, right?

Yeah thats why i said critically bad because i knew this would happen, its just opinion but i meant actually bad games.(btw I do agree with you. i never liked fifa that much and on top of that the new game every year pisses me off so much)

 

[TsunamiWombat]

Rouge warrior...wasn't that based on something out of 2000AD?

Your thinking of Rogue Trooper, and yes it's a comic in the 2100 AD universe.

Rogue Warrior is just a bad game apparently. Though this should NOT surprise anything because whether they create it or not Bethesda is not exactly known for making good games excepting their main Elder Scrolls series (Arena, Daggerfall, Morrowwind, and Oblivion) and of course now Fallout 3. Just about everything else they have released through the years has quite frankly been at best mediocre. Ranging from a race car game (X Racers I believe), to a Star Wars chess program, to a Star Trek game for the PSP. Their Elder Scrolls spin offs which broke away from the sandbox mould were likewise fairly bad, neither Battlespire or Redguard were paticularly successful.

I've been of the opinion for a while that they should stick to sandbox RPGs. They have experimented with a number of generes, which I guess I can't fault them for, but in general they seem to have failed in just about all of them.

Not a slam, just an observation.

Rogue TROOPER on the other hand had potential and was okay.

 

[Pyotr Romanov]

Name without using google 10 critically bad games that ea have published. Its not that easy.

Yes it is: Fifa 1995 - Fifa 10.
See? Done.
Maybe they weren't all crap, but it stayed the same, that counts as crap for me.

EDIT: Wait a sec... They did publish those, right?

Yeah thats why i said critically bad because i knew this would happen, its just opinion but i meant actually bad games.(btw I do agree with you. i never liked fifa that much and on top of that the new game every year pisses me off so much)

Hmm... I guess I should have read it better then.

 

[Pyotr Romanov]

Bethesda is great at throwing together a large volume of content but not great at designing rules or detailed content. See Wet if you don't believe me. The rules of Oblivion aren't balanced or interesting in the slightest, but for the pleasure of walking through such an extensive and open world we'll pretty much swallow anything.

Name without using google 10 critically bad games that ea have published. Its not that easy.

Yes it is: Fifa 1995 - Fifa 10.
See? Done.
Maybe they weren't all crap, but it stayed the same, that counts as crap for me.

EDIT: Wait a sec... They did publish those, right?

Yes they did. Look it up on Wikipedia.

Yeah, I couldn't, that'd be the same as using google. Hehe...

 

[Hyper-space]

Bethesda was the publisher. So you can sleep well tonight knowing that Bethesda didn't make this crap game.

Everything else is still up for debate

oh no you did'nt!

but in all seriousness, bethesda haven't made a single terrible game. EVER.

I HAVE SPOKEN!

 

[The1stMJC]

I see how bad the game is and I want the game more. I love trainwrecks and will rent it this week. Cannot wait to play this horrible game and since I have a PS3 only this will probably be even worse since multiplatform games tend to be a little worse on the PS3 than 360.