Soooo, you're saying this is a good thing? Clue me in here, I don't know much about the Doctor or how his production system works.The_root_of_all_evil said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7411177.stm
I think I may just have had a Who-gasm.
It made me laugh.JJDWilson said:Did anyone enjoy the empty child reference episode before last?
This definitely bodes well.The_root_of_all_evil said:Did I mention his replacement was the writer of Blink (Weeping Angels), The Empty Child (Are you my mummy?) and The Girl in the Fireplace?
Personal Opinion Follows:HalfShadow said:Well, when two Gallifreyans really really love each other...Saskwach said:Soooo, you're saying this is a good thing? Clue me in here, I don't know much about the Doctor or how his production system works.
That is exactly why I've hated so much of the new Doctor Who series. As far as I have seen, RTD simply has no backbone: after massacring the cast at the end of series 1, Magic Rose brought everyone back to life; in the series 2 finale, Rose "died in battle" just like the Devil said... oh, wait, NO SHE DIDN'T! After that, I've only seen a few episodes, and from what I have seen I doubt that very much has changed. After all, he wrote Torchwood. Idiot.The_root_of_all_evil said:RTD is a egomaniacal, dickwad that cannot write a decent story without relying solely on 'death of a family member' 'twist' and makes up shit as he goes along.
Moffat writes stories that have you talking about them for years afterwards and still squealing when you see them again; and STILL manage to be within the spirit of the show; without being set on a bloody London Council Estate.
Those are my favorite episodes; I am in a state of glee.The_root_of_all_evil said:Did I mention his replacement was the writer of Blink (Weeping Angels), The Empty Child (Are you my mummy?) and The Girl in the Fireplace?
I concur; they actually were interesting to watch, and gave a little horror and interest to Saturday nights, rather than just 'O LOOK ALIEN BATTLESHIPS LUL!'.Larenxis said:Those are my favorite episodes; I am in a state of glee.The_root_of_all_evil said:Did I mention his replacement was the writer of Blink (Weeping Angels), The Empty Child (Are you my mummy?) and The Girl in the Fireplace?
madmurch said:That is exactly why I've hated so much of the new Doctor Who series. As far as I have seen, RTD simply has no backbone: after massacring the cast at the end of series 1, Magic Rose brought everyone back to life; in the series 2 finale, Rose "died in battle" just like the Devil said... oh, wait, NO SHE DIDN'T! After that, I've only seen a few episodes, and from what I have seen I doubt that very much has changed. After all, he wrote Torchwood. Idiot.
And then there are all the episodes that revolve around screwing up British history... already Shakespeare, Agatha Christie and Queen Victoria had suffered at the hands of poor writers. It won't be long before Doctor Who is revealed to be King Arthur, pulling Excalibur from the stone with his sonic screwdriver; or perhaps he'll lead the British to victory in World War 2 instead of Winston Churchill. Maybe RTD doesn't write these ones (I haven't seen much of the show recently, though the Doctor's Daughter episode almost had a few good elements buried within the rubbish) but since he is the Big Boss of Doctor Who, he clearly approves of them.
Doctor Who needs a shake-up. With RTD gone, I might try watching the next series: who knows, it might try something original and decent. I can but hope.
no they weren't meant to be all that serious, there's always been a bit of tongue in cheek humour across all the series and doctorsGooble said:Those 3 eps were pretty good...but it seems the vast majority you just cant take at all seriously. They're entertaining enough and those potato dudes were pretty cool. I don't know how seriously the old ones were meant to be, so it might just be continuing the trend; but for me they need to make them far more serious, even if it does cut out some of the younger audience.