Rumor: BioShock Infinite Drops Multiplayer

Recommended Videos

Yureina

Who are you?
May 6, 2010
7,098
0
0
Good.

Bioshock should stick to being a single-player game. That is what it does best anyway. :eek:
 

karloss01

New member
Jul 5, 2009
991
0
0


I played the mutliplayer for like a day, it was fun being the big daddy for a moment but other then that it was crap.
 

BENZOOKA

This is the most wittiest title
Oct 26, 2009
3,919
0
0
That's just good news. You don't have to have multiplayer, and especially co-op, in every single game.
 

chadachada123

New member
Jan 17, 2011
2,309
0
0
The response of the vast majority of the gaming community:



The multiplayer was bland and does not belong in a game that relies so heavily on atmosphere and isolation. Unless it was done in a fashion similar to Dark Souls, where you can see influences from other players in a subtle fashion, or with co-op/PVP in isolated instances entwined with the single player gameplay (and I don't mean that Mass Effect bullshit), I'd rather they just leave the connectivity out entirely.
 

Th37thTrump3t

New member
Nov 12, 2009
882
0
0
So... Basically two multiplayer modes I could not even possibly give any less of a flying dog shit about have been dropped.
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,804
0
0
When I first read the headline I though it was good news, there's no need for multiplayer in Bioshock. But after reading it, that co-op could have been really awesome, given the differing proficiencies of the 2 main protagonists. I would love it if Elizabeth had no gun at all, and had to rely on other tactics.
Oh, and to all the people getting their hopes up, they never said anything about deathmatch. This entire news story could very well signify that they've sacrificed the possibly interesting co-op for the most likely generic deathmatch.
 

Sylocat

Sci-Fi & Shakespeare
Nov 13, 2007
2,122
0
0
Ironically, BioShock 2's multiplayer was some of the most innovative and creative I've ever seen.

Still, I'm not terribly disappointed here.
 

RobfromtheGulag

New member
May 18, 2010
930
0
0
Durgiun said:
And not a single toss was given by BioShock fans
Yep. Multiplayer on a singleplayer game is icing. I'd like to make some parallel about single player in MW/BF games, but the right words escape me.
 

Baron von Blitztank

New member
May 7, 2010
2,132
0
0
Would have only been active for around a month or so after release and then the servers will dry up more than your mama's cooch, leaving many players annoyed that they'll be unable to achieve the multiplayer-only achievements.
 

Innegativeion

Positively Neutral!
Feb 18, 2011
1,636
0
0

I won't get to play generic fps multiplayer in my story/emotion-driven single player first person adventure game?

what a... tragedy.... '_' God I can't even pretend to give half a fuck about this. Actually, scratch that; I do care. I am HAPPY about this. Making multiplayer-centric games is fine, hell I endorse it! However, less time, effort, and resources spent on superfluous features for a primarily single player experience can only be a good thing.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Innegativeion said:
I see your Oh no and raise you a


At this point I'll be happy if the game actually gets released, what with them losing two project leads recently.

It's nice to see some news about it at any rate and that it hasn't become vaporware.
 

teh_Canape

New member
May 18, 2010
2,665
0
0
Aerosteam 1908 said:
Then again, we'll never know how good or bad it would have actually been.
indeed
what with ME3's multiplayer being so surprisingly awesome
and that it felt like it was more in line with the concept of ME3's story than the campaign (you know, setting the galaxy in an all-out war and you playing as a random foot soldier trying to help do your part)

but don't worry, I'm sure they will bring it back for Bioshock Infinite 2, where you also play as a Handyman
not any Handyman, but the FIRST successful one
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
teh_Canape said:
Aerosteam 1908 said:
Then again, we'll never know how good or bad it would have actually been.
indeed
what with ME3's multiplayer being so surprisingly awesome
and that it felt like it was more in line with the concept of ME3's story than the campaign (you know, setting the galaxy in an all-out war and you playing as a random foot soldier trying to help do your part)

but don't worry, I'm sure they will bring it back for Bioshock Infinite 2, where you also play as a Handyman
not any Handyman, but the FIRST successful one
I think Mass Effect 3's multiplayer worked so well because it was co op and therefore more in tune with people who like to play RPG's rather than hyper competitive people. You are right that it fit in well with the atmosphere of the game. I liked the events they did too.
 

Durgiun

New member
Dec 25, 2008
842
0
0
RobfromtheGulag said:
Durgiun said:
And not a single toss was given by BioShock fans
Yep. Multiplayer on a singleplayer game is icing. I'd like to make some parallel about single player in MW/BF games, but the right words escape me.
Each mode that makes the respective game fun is vestigial in the other?
 

Treaos Serrare

New member
Aug 19, 2009
445
0
0
Please god yes, drop pointless and unnecessary multiplayer from a game that never should have even hinted at having it to begin with. I have said this in other threads and on other forums, I Hate Multiplayer add-on's to games that do not benefit from the Multiplayer experience, not that eloquently mind you but that's the gist. it takes away time and resources that should have been spent making the single-player experience deeper and more fulfilling.