i agree whole heartedly, and when i imagine this i imagine it with a huge trollface overlapping his facesamsonguy920 said:Know what will really piss me off about this? When the White House or some loud mouth Congressman actually reacts to it like Iran wants. If they really want to make Iran feel like it isn't the center of the Middle East, then there best not be anybody in Washington or from Fox News saying a word when the game gets released. Israel can cry all it wants, that won't matter.
The trouble is, Fox and some loud mouth Congressman will speak up about this, and Ayatollah and President will feel justified in anything they do to try to egg the US on.
I have nothing against Iran making a game about some attack on Tel Aviv. Frankly the government of Israel has it coming. But the underlying attempt might actually do its purpose, whatever format or quality the game is.
(And unless they are full of vaporware, there are game companies in Iran that do produce quality games. But as was stated before, most likely this one will be so rushed through it will have more bugs than an average Bethesda release.)
It remains to be seen what happens from this.
i think i love your logic....why do people make assumptions about iran..it was a nice place before it got ripped in two with all the political craposity..TheBelgianGuy said:Yeah, all the posts in this thread are so funny. Nobody knows shit about Iran, or any other country besides their good ol' US of A. Just what they heard others say on the tv or... in a videogame.Arif_Sohaib said:Art has always been used as propaganda, just look at the Great Pyramid, it was propaganda for the ruler of that time.ThatDarnCoyote said:They don't consider games "art", they see them as a means of propaganda, which is not the same thing. Battlefield 3, whatever you may think of it, was not produced by an arm of the American government.Arif_Sohaib said:At least they aren't like some of the people appearing on Fox who would blame all the world's evils on games. At least they look at games as a way of story telling and by extension, their statements prove that Iran officially considers games as art and their ruling class is admitting this despite not playing any games at all and all of you ignore this fact.
As for them not being like Fox News who "blame all the world's evil on games", the Iranians take a much more old-fashioned approach by blaming all the world's evil on the Jews. [http://www.debka.com/article/21536/]
The site you quoted with a strange propaganda like banner on the top asking "Who are the real Jews?" in Farsi(yes, I can read a bit of Farsi as it is similar to Urdu), doesn't exactly seem unbiased. Iran actually has reserved seats for Jews in their Parliament, as it does for every other religious minority. They are against Israel and the US for killing Mossadeq and supporting the tyrannical Shah and continuously trying to challenge their government and portraying them as villains and not allowing them the same right and technology to defend themselves against any attack from Israel, which has constantly been threatening to attack it.
And then when Iran fears a videogame for the perception it brings to these sheeple who have no idea of their own... WELL THEN IRAN IS STUPID HARHARHAR!
Please. If CAnada and Mexico were occupied by China, and if they had established several hundreds of military bases around the US, and had a reputation for warmongering and invading countries because they had "WMDS" but then couldn't find them...
And then suddenly China starts pumping out games to depict the US as villains and about destroying and invading major US cities...
You would not be alarmed?
Rofl. Stop fooling yourselves.
jeez, do u really think they care about u being mad over their game ? Iam sure they dont even care about u playing it . its very simple : as i explained here before ; ofcurse American's clivil/gamer dont get mad becuz of such game ,as Iranian gamer didnt get mad over Battlefield 3,they all know its just game and fiction. infact all of them played it as they play other games . its noting to do with us its government.Macgyvercas said:Hey, Hevva, regarding this part, when do you think people will finally get it that if you live on this planet, you're fair game to be the bad guy?Hevva said:"Their reaction was that it is only a game and we should take it easy, but with the game set in Tehran, it is simply not acceptable," he said.
And do they seriously think a game about about attacking Israel will make me madder than a game about attacking Washington? They've got to be stupid. Unlike the censorship board in Iran, I know that games ARE JUST GAMES.
/rant.
(Oh, and Hevaa, that wasn't aimed at you. Well, the question was, but the rest of it wasn't. Just clearing that up pre-emptively).
I'm sorry, but I am not able to interpret your response. Would you mind responding again without the text speak?AMK11 said:jeez, do u really think they care about u being mad over their game ? Iam sure they dont even care about u playing it . its very simple : as i explained here before ; ofcurse American's clivil/gamer dont get mad becuz of such game ,as Iranian gamer didnt get mad over Battlefield 3,they all know its just game and fiction. infact all of them played it as they play other games . its noting to do with us its government.Macgyvercas said:Hey, Hevva, regarding this part, when do you think people will finally get it that if you live on this planet, you're fair game to be the bad guy?Hevva said:"Their reaction was that it is only a game and we should take it easy, but with the game set in Tehran, it is simply not acceptable," he said.
And do they seriously think a game about about attacking Israel will make me madder than a game about attacking Washington? They've got to be stupid. Unlike the censorship board in Iran, I know that games ARE JUST GAMES.
/rant.
(Oh, and Hevaa, that wasn't aimed at you. Well, the question was, but the rest of it wasn't. Just clearing that up pre-emptively).
I think My point is clear .unless its ur first time using computer .Macgyvercas said:I'm sorry, but I am not able to interpret your response. Would you mind responding again without the text speak?AMK11 said:jeez, do u really think they care about u being mad over their game ? Iam sure they dont even care about u playing it . its very simple : as i explained here before ; ofcurse American's clivil/gamer dont get mad becuz of such game ,as Iranian gamer didnt get mad over Battlefield 3,they all know its just game and fiction. infact all of them played it as they play other games . its noting to do with us its government.Macgyvercas said:Hey, Hevva, regarding this part, when do you think people will finally get it that if you live on this planet, you're fair game to be the bad guy?Hevva said:"Their reaction was that it is only a game and we should take it easy, but with the game set in Tehran, it is simply not acceptable," he said.
And do they seriously think a game about about attacking Israel will make me madder than a game about attacking Washington? They've got to be stupid. Unlike the censorship board in Iran, I know that games ARE JUST GAMES.
/rant.
(Oh, and Hevaa, that wasn't aimed at you. Well, the question was, but the rest of it wasn't. Just clearing that up pre-emptively).
If your thoughts can't be easily understood at first glance, then the point you are trying to make is not clear, my friend. I'm all for a good debate and exchange of opinions, but when I am unable to understand the person I am speaking (or in this case typing) to, it makes debate and conversation next to impossible.AMK11 said:uMacgyvercas said:I'm sorry, but I am not able to interpret your response. Would you mind responding again without the text speak?AMK11 said:jeez, do u really think they care about u being mad over their game ? Iam sure they dont even care about u playing it . its very simple : as i explained here before ; ofcurse American's clivil/gamer dont get mad becuz of such game ,as Iranian gamer didnt get mad over Battlefield 3,they all know its just game and fiction. infact all of them played it as they play other games . its noting to do with us its government.Macgyvercas said:Hey, Hevva, regarding this part, when do you think people will finally get it that if you live on this planet, you're fair game to be the bad guy?Hevva said:"Their reaction was that it is only a game and we should take it easy, but with the game set in Tehran, it is simply not acceptable," he said.
And do they seriously think a game about about attacking Israel will make me madder than a game about attacking Washington? They've got to be stupid. Unlike the censorship board in Iran, I know that games ARE JUST GAMES.
/rant.
(Oh, and Hevaa, that wasn't aimed at you. Well, the question was, but the rest of it wasn't. Just clearing that up pre-emptively).
And jet those things aren't even close to invading Iran.Irridium said:Oh calm down.
New York gets blown to shit countless times in games, you don't see them complaining about it. Or much people complaining about Washington getting fucked in Modern Warfare 2. The city, Washington. Not the person. If it was the person then yeah, complaints would probably be had. Especially if it was full on graphic- you know what? I'll just stop here.
Though having so many games featuring the Middle-East lately... it is getting pretty old. And I suppose people would flip their shit if you played the attackers attacking the US instead of the defenders.
oh i didnt know iam reading a post about English grammer??! I think while iam learning some more grammer mabey u should learn diffrence between Arabs and perisan/Iranian . did i said anyting about Arabs? they have their own Culture and ideas. u SAID they (IR government)are stupid that thinks u will get mad over their Game! the truth is you are not smart enough to understand the point . now read my post again . and try to Lrn som txt spking 2 . itz not hrd.Razada said:Your point seems to be "No gamers care, it is all about what the government thinks" which is a fair enough point. However, I would disagree. Read this. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/issues/issue_269/8044-Muslims-in-My-MonitorAMK11 said:u dont have to respone .i dont need it anyway. I think my point its clear .Macgyvercas said:I'm sorry, but I am not able to interpret your response. Would you mind responding again without the text speak?AMK11 said:jeez, do u really think they care about u being mad over their game ? Iam sure they dont even care about u playing it . its very simple : as i explained here before ; ofcurse American's clivil/gamer dont get mad becuz of such game ,as Iranian gamer didnt get mad over Battlefield 3,they all know its just game and fiction. infact all of them played it as they play other games . its noting to do with us its government.Macgyvercas said:Hey, Hevva, regarding this part, when do you think people will finally get it that if you live on this planet, you're fair game to be the bad guy?Hevva said:"Their reaction was that it is only a game and we should take it easy, but with the game set in Tehran, it is simply not acceptable," he said.
And do they seriously think a game about about attacking Israel will make me madder than a game about attacking Washington? They've got to be stupid. Unlike the censorship board in Iran, I know that games ARE JUST GAMES.
/rant.
(Oh, and Hevaa, that wasn't aimed at you. Well, the question was, but the rest of it wasn't. Just clearing that up pre-emptively).
It is an article written by a Muslim gamer going on about the depictions of Arabs in computer games. It is a rather out of date article now but still, it is a very interesting read. It might help you come to terms with the idea that the average Arab gamer is getting pissed off at the depictions of all Arabs as bad guys (Outside of some Strategy games and Ass Creed.) So, friend, I disagree with your point.
The issue is not that it was an insult but what the game represents. "We are so used to the idea of invading your country to stop you from building nukes you might not be building it has turned into a game!"
That is my point.
I am now done.
Also...
"You dont have to response" is not correct grammar. If you are going to use text speak, please just abbreviate, do not misuse the language. And outside of texts textspeak is unwelcome. But if you MUST abbreviate everything you say, as I have stated, please make sure what you are saying makes sense.
Actually it's the sentiments of like 99% of the culture in the region beyond Iran, even if American Left Wingers choose not to realize it. I could post tons of links starting with children's shows brainwashing kids to hate Americans and Jews (especially the latter) and going on about the connection.Treblaine said:But Digital Illusions CE (DICE) who made the game is an entirely Swedish developer!?!Hevva said:In keeping with the calm rhetorical tone [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_and_Israel] set by Iran's vocal leader in recent years, NCGF head Behruz Minaii told the Fars News Agency that, "The United States is governed by the Zionist Regime so Attack on Tel Aviv would make Americans angrier than a game about an attack on Washington."
"We have submitted several letters of objection to the developers of [Battlefield 3] but we have yet to receive a response," continued Minaii.
According to the Tehran Times, Minaii tried to get answers at the Dubai World Game Summit from Gears of War studio Epic Games (which is odd, unless it's a translation error or incorrect) but was not impressed with the response. "Their reaction was that it is only a game and we should take it easy, but with the game set in Tehran, it is simply not acceptable," he said.
America controlled by Israel?
This is Hideo-Kojima-on-acid level of insane idiocy, only it's not the final cutscene of a freaky-deaky video game, it's the ACTUAL words of an ACTUAL politician?!?
Actually, it would be better if none of the sides was portraited as neither good or evil. How about a game where you play missions on both sides, and explore each sides motivations and contradictions? Just like in reality! Battlefield 2 for PS2 shyly attempted this, it even had some FMVs with the news of both sides clearly manipulating reality. It was quite smart, I'd like to see more steps in that direction.Corporal Yakob said:You damn dirty Islamofascist Communist hippy!The Cheshire said:Well, I'd like a military game where you shoot white non-Russian people instead of the usual "commies" or "brown people, presumably terrorists or cartel dealers, cause they're brown".
Really, these games are always racist-y deep down, let's have another sort of racism for a change. I want to shoot some Johns and Jacks for a change! I'm bored of killing Dimitri and Mohammed! I want WASP blood on my hands!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA, RACISM, HURRAY HURRAY! CHEERS!
Seriously though we are in dire need of games where the West is the enemy-what a twist!