Rumor: PlayStation 4 Will Feature PS3 Game Streaming

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
kiri2tsubasa said:
thesilentman said:
Right, so I paid for all those hard copies for nothing. Way to think smartly, Sony. I don't see this working out at all for you guys. Try harder.
You still have your PS3 right? So, what stops you from using it when you feel like playing a PS3 game? I honestly have no clue as to WHY this is an issue. Was never an issue back in the NES/SNES/N64 era, so why now? Besides, backwards computability makes things more expensive so, by not having it, the system is cheaper, isn't that what people want?
You'd think so. But that sounds too logical. Also there's two sides, one who wants a cheaper console and one who wants backwards compatibility. Then there's people that demand both. These people are also known to want to have their cake and eat it too.
 

Sylveria

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,285
0
0
kiri2tsubasa said:
thesilentman said:
Right, so I paid for all those hard copies for nothing. Way to think smartly, Sony. I don't see this working out at all for you guys. Try harder.
You still have your PS3 right? So, what stops you from using it when you feel like playing a PS3 game? I honestly have no clue as to WHY this is an issue. Was never an issue back in the NES/SNES/N64 era, so why now? Besides, backwards computability makes things more expensive so, by not having it, the system is cheaper, isn't that what people want?
I'd rather pay more and have backwards compatibility than have to find a place to hook up yet another console or have to hooking and unhooking them whenever I want to play something on an old machine.
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,134
0
0
Single-handedly the most retarded "solution" for backwards compatibility ever.

This is Always-Online DRM all over again. Fucking stop it already.
 

ivc392

New member
Aug 26, 2010
194
0
0
Cid SilverWing said:
Single-handedly the most retarded "solution" for backwards compatibility ever.

This is Always-Online DRM all over again. Fucking stop it already.
At least they are trying... but yes, retarded is more than accurate. Between the used games issue and now this moronic excuse for backwards compatibility the only console Im exited about is the Ouya.

Know what? Fuck sony, fuck consoles. Long live PC, where Steam reigns supreme and I don't have to deal with this crap...
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
Tanakh said:
If they wanted? Very easy:

- Insert the old physical copy of your PS3 into your PS4.

- Have the console read the disk and identify the game.

- Give you access to said game Stream.

With that, selling digital copies at a discount and maybe charging a small montly fee for the backward compatibility service (to pay for the bandwith and stuff, probably along the lines of 4.99 with adds or 9.99 without adds) you end up with a great service that will lure many hardcore PS gamers.
Nope, they won't do that. One of two things would happen: it will be abused by people renting games or trading them with friends if it's free, or for even a small fee, those of us with legit collections will be pissed off and not buy anything.

Not that it matters because streaming is garbage anyway. I'll be keeping my PS3 so I can play my games without lag and without bandwidth charges to worry about.

ForgottenPr0digy said:
Cid SilverWing said:
Single-handedly the most retarded "solution" for backwards compatibility ever.

This is Always-Online DRM all over again. Fucking stop it already.
how else are you going to stream games without a internet connection??
You aren't going to stream games at all because streaming games isn't worth the time or money. Cid is spot on, it's just always online DRM and all of its problems all over again, except this time, where always online DRM only ruined your single player experience if the internet connection went out or the servers went down, streaming a game ruins your single player experience 100% of the time due to input delay caused by lag. Why the hell does anyone even pretend to think this technology is useful or a good idea? It's garbage. It's the worst thing introduced to gaming in a long time. So many negative things to say about it and not a single positive aspect about it to help balance out all the negatives. It's useless and the sooner everyone gives up on it, the better.
 

Burst6

New member
Mar 16, 2009
916
0
0
I have no idea how much putting a ps3 chip in the ps4 would cost, but i imagine it would be very expensive. Isn't sony using a coding system that's not a nightmare for developers to design this time? I imagine adding hardware that lets you play ps3 games will be very expensive. I already have a PS3, and i don't think the extra 1/4 of a cubic foot of space is worth 100 dollars. Hopefully Sony learned their lesson about console pricing so i highly doubt it would be added.


You know what would be nice though? An optional attachment that would add PS3 compatability. Just a small box you can buy and plug into a port on the side or something.

Anyway, this is just a rumor that comes from pretty much nowhere. I wouldn't trust it at all. I'll wait for the official announcement.
 

Evil Smurf

Admin of Catoholics Anonymous
Nov 11, 2011
11,597
0
0
Tank207 said:
And for those of us who already own a mountain of physical PS3 games? I'd rather have actual backwards compatibility or none at all. The more I hear about this next generation of consoles, the less interested I am with owning one.
If I did not already game on a computer this would push me too it.
 

heroicbob

New member
Aug 25, 2010
153
0
0
doesn't game streaming chug like 2 gigs an hour? whatever I'm just nitpicking the one complaint about every new console is that there isn't enough games so they pretty much had to do something like this

am i the odd one out for keeping my old consoles?
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Jan 19, 2011
5,498
1
3
Country
United States
heroicbob said:
doesn't game streaming chug like 2 gigs an hour? whatever I'm just nitpicking the one complaint about every new console is that there isn't enough games so they pretty much had to do something like this

am i the odd one out for keeping my old consoles?
No, because I plan on keeping my PS3 until it dies a honorably while letting me play a game.

I know that some people don't have the space to have that right next to their new console or anywhere, but I don't plan on throwing it away since I paid good money for it and it still works.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
So... what happens when they shut the servers down? I'm guessing no more PS3 games?

If nothing else, I really hope the PS4 plays PS1/PS2 games. That's what I really want.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
heroicbob said:
doesn't game streaming chug like 2 gigs an hour? whatever I'm just nitpicking the one complaint about every new console is that there isn't enough games so they pretty much had to do something like this

am i the odd one out for keeping my old consoles?
No you are not. Still have my PS2 and Xbox. Because my PS3 and 360 can't play the games I have on 'em. Or in the 360's case, the games I have aren't on the list of supported games. Because Microsoft stopped doing that.

Grr...
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Tank207 said:
And for those of us who already own a mountain of physical PS3 games? I'd rather have actual backwards compatibility or none at all. The more I hear about this next generation of consoles, the less interested I am with owning one.
Especially since 0% of it is confirmed and not much of it is at all likely to be true. Good reason to lose interest.
 

loa

New member
Jan 28, 2012
1,716
0
0
What's the point of streaming if you had to rebuy games anyway?
Sounds like an awkward, cost intensive way around porting games.
Surely having servers compute and stream games in real time online 24/7 is more expensive than the 1 time cost of porting it and offering it for download?
 

Austin Manning

New member
Apr 10, 2012
198
0
0
I'm kind of hoping for something like this: PlayStation Plus subscribers get access to every game for free. Regular user get access to all of Sony's first party titles for free. (and maybe some promotional free weekends for certain new releases)
 

Proverbial Jon

Not evil, just mildly malevolent
Nov 10, 2009
2,093
0
0
FinalDream said:
I have the perfect backwards compatibility method for the PS4 already, it's called a PS3! It will live in my cupboard until I feel the need to replay a game!

Even then it's unlikely I will need it, I don't really replay games at all, once I have beaten them once.
This. I have all my consoles and original games kicking about somewhere. If you want to continue enjoying older games it's really the only way. [small]Takes up a lot of space though...[/small]

OT: I didn't buy a PS3 until long after it had been released. It meant that I then had a large back catalogue of games to keep me occupied. I'll do the same this time, if indeed I even buy a PS4 at all.
 

Kyogissun

Notably Neutral
Jan 12, 2010
520
0
0
Well if I have to rebuy my copies of Tales of Graces F, Record of Agarest War 2, Tales of Xillia (when it releases), Tales of Xillia 2 (If it releases), The Last of Us, The Last Guardian and numerous other titles I still have this system for, Sony can kindly go fuck themselves.

I'm not rebuying shit for their new console if this is true.