KikReask said:
I remember in Batman Begins while that movie was dark and serious there were quite a few humorous moments thanks to the acting between Christian Bale and Michale Caine acting just like normal people toward one another, like in the plane scene that was funny and subtle. I honestly cannot take someone like Superman seriously, that's why I wasn't impressed with the new movie last year, how am I supposed to take him seriously? A guy in a blue costume with a red cape and red boots? These characters were made for children back in the 30s for like 10c why do they have to be so dark.
So...you can take a man that runs around on rooftops in a bat costume seriously but not Superman?
Complaining that they have to be so dark is kinda offset by your opening sentence praising the Nolan trilogy, and your worry that there might not be any Joker, when again, the Joker in the nolan movies didn't even make so much as an amusing quip. The real Joker certainly wasn't in /those/ movies. There were moments of light heartedness, but acting as if the Nolan trilogy didn't take itself seriously to the extreme in its fetish for realism is kind of off; they were still very dark films. Nolans films took themselves so seriously they threw everything aside from Batmans origin story out the window in the name of seriousness. No Ra's al Ghul, No Joker, No Bane, No Catwoman, No penguin, no clay face, no killer croc, no lazurus pits, no venom, no supervillians, no batmobile, no joker venom, no acid flowers, no jokes, no crazy comic book schemes, otherwise they might detract from the seriousness of the very grown up and realistic story we're trying to tell. About a man in a bat costume that runs around on rooftops.
You can't complain DC is trying to take itself too seriously /and/ praise the Nolan movies.
Mentioning comics were made in the 30s for children hasn't held water since at the very least 1973, when Gwen Stacy died. They haven't really been for children for a very long time. Things evolve, things "mature" and change.