If thats the case, it would be cheaper. But unless I can see myself playing a game multiple times, either from different ways to play main story or multiplayer, I dont buy it.Top Hat said:That sounds like a good idea, but since I like going back & replaying previous Zelda games, it might just be cheaper to buy it rather than renting it many times.WanderingFool said:I suggest a Rent-a-Center. Rent a WiiU for a month, Rent the game, and return both.Top Hat said:This is good news. The only thing that annoys me is that I'll probably buy a WiiU for this & not get any other games...
Thats my currant plan, as I dont know what kind of library the WiiU will have, and cant justify spending any money on a system I may only use to play Zelda.
Woah. Cool your tits dude. You jumped right to defensive mode out of nowhere. Ghonzor could have meant anything from the controller to not having other games he doesnt like. Deep Breaths.Angry Juju said:Unless the console were to be absurdly overpriced and would break after 2 months... But then I remember a certain other console that did that... I don't remember people giving that console ridiculous amounts of shit for it.
Really?DarthSka said:And now my excitement has begun. I was already going to get a Wii U, but this just makes it even better.
Actually, from what I recall, it worked out pretty well.King of Asgaard said:Isn't that what they said about Skyward Sword?
And THAT turned out so well, didn't it...?
The Wii U not having any flaws isnt something one can state until everyone gets a chance to use it.Angry Juju said:I honestly don't see what part of that message makes me come across as angry... Aside from if you looked at my name.
And he doesn't like the console, despite it having no flaws aside from not being powerful enough... And even then the Wii wasn't that powerful but then I can name at least 10 games that I OWN which were more interesting and unique than a lot of Xbox titles (I don't care if you just like games where you smash zombies, they're neither interesting ideas nor unique, just mindless fun)
This is a Zelda thread
He's reading it because he's interested in Zelda
He lost interest because it's on the Wii U
Yes, yes it did, in fact it was one of the best Wii-Mote implementations I've ever seen.King of Asgaard said:Isn't that what they said about Skyward Sword?
And THAT turned out so well, didn't it...?
You, Do know that Cracked.com is in no way, shape, or form, a news site, and is more about opinions of things, right? And you do know that the person who wrote that article has a high bias against Nintendo, right? Lastly, you do know that everything that he pointed out against Nintendo has been done on everything else, right?Foolproof said:This is a good place to startAngry Juju said:Yes. There's nothing wrong with it. If you don't like the game, fine. But there's nothing wrong with the console. I like the look of some of the games on the lineup, I also like a lot of the games on the 3DS.Foolproof said:Have you seen, like, anything to do with it?Angry Juju said:Why? There's nothing wrong with it.Ghonzor said:http://i.imgur.com/z8gWA.png
As long as the Wii U is involved in anything, this is how I feel
http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-ways-we-know-nintendo-has-lost-its-mind/
From there on, there's just so much more wrong with it.
Probably not but then in my opinion those are the 2 best zelda games made.Olrod said:Yes... but is it going to be as much FUN as "A Link to the Past" and "Link's Awakening"?
I laughed hard at 2 with the zombiU bit. I think the writer forgot more games have been made that didn't pause the game when going to the inventory. Alone in the dark remake was one of those. You could possibly be killed when you were fiddling with your inventory. The only difference was that with alone in the dark you couldn't see that it was about to happen because the screen was filled with the inside of your jacket.Mr.Mattress said:You, Do know that Cracked.com is in no way, shape, or form, a news site, and is more about opinions of things, right? And you do know that the person who wrote that article has a high bias against Nintendo, right? Lastly, you do know that everything that he pointed out against Nintendo has been done on everything else, right?