so they can start up a new developer? because otherwise thats alittle over the topThoraxe said:I hope they fire all the people at Bioware too.
so they can start up a new developer? because otherwise thats alittle over the topThoraxe said:I hope they fire all the people at Bioware too.
I thourght that was casey hudosnPumpkin_Eater said:Mac Walters is the only one that really deserves it. He's the one who took the franchise away from its original direction, he's the one who wrote the ending, he's probably the one responsible for the little kid fiasco. He used his position of head writer to bypass the peer review process that every other writer's work went through. He (maybe the person who gave him the position) should pay the full price.Thoraxe said:That would beautiful. With the way EA games sysmetacally gobbles up talented companies and turns them into shit, the idea that an even crappier company might absorbs them, is really delicious in its irony and its justice.
I hope they fire all the people at Bioware too.
I've heard that name too, but only in conjunction with Walters. So maybe two writers should get the axe?Vault101 said:I thourght that was casey hudosn
hudson is pretty much the head of Bioware I thinkPumpkin_Eater said:I've heard that name too, but only in conjunction with Walters. So maybe two writers should get the axe?Vault101 said:I thourght that was casey hudosn
Drew Karpyshyr. His absence completely nullifies the artistic integrity rationale for preserving the ending. It's like Stephanie Meyer coauthored Two Towers and wrote Return of the King.Vault101 said:hudson is pretty much the head of Bioware I think
and that drew guy (who pretty much created ME) left...
..hmmmm
Well not really refuting what youve said, though Nexon would do no better with EA properties, and would only do worse. Basically they would migrate as much as humanly possible into micro transaction models to which people will stop playing and in turn the properties will wilt away. Its not that I doubt it, its that It will be quite depressing if it does happen.ultramarine486 said:[
EA has dropped from 50$ a share to 12$ before the rumor got out. Amusingly their stock dropped the same time SPORE was released and we all remember how well that went over. They've pretty much been in decline for the last five years or so and ME3 and The Old Republic really hasn't done much to save them. It also might not be optional. Nexon could try for a hostile takeover. It seems more likely that it would be a merger if anything. Nexon with their free to play experience and EA with their titles, triple A games, and desire for better working micro transactions.
EA going down the drain wouldn't be that bad really. Sure we might see less AAA games being pushed out but really that could be seen as a good thing since those games tend to overshadow everything else when they come out and having more attention to smaller developers and their games isn't bad. I mean without google can anyone give me a good list of what other games came out in the same month as Mass Effect 3?
Well I personally hate Nexon more than EA. Talk about abusing DLC all you want, at least you don't need to buy the DLC to beat the game. Nexon are that special kind of dickhead who think offering a game that's free to download but requires real-money bought items to get anywhere is a fantastic idea.ToTaL LoLiGe said:What if this new company is more evil than EA? EA could be transformed into some Frankinstein's monster made up of super evil.
Well at this point it's just speculation. It could end up, and likely will be, really terrible but at the same time it could work on some degree. The target audience might end up shifting to focus to Korea instead of America meaning that EA wouldn't take over as many promising publishers like Bioware or Pandemic. It's hard to say at this point since we still have to wait and see if anything even comes of the rumor or if it is just smoke blowing.viranimus said:Well not really refuting what youve said, though Nexon would do no better with EA properties, and would only do worse. Basically they would migrate as much as humanly possible into micro transaction models to which people will stop playing and in turn the properties will wilt away. Its not that I doubt it, its that It will be quite depressing if it does happen.
As for games in March... I dont use google for anything. Off the top of my head, Street Fighter x Tekken, I am alive, Yakuza DS, Silent hill Downpour, Silent Hill HDS rehash, Ninga Gaiden 3, RE: Operation Raccoon city. Though honestly im not sure if March was just mediocre this year or still realing from the painful backlog of 2011 titles.
Voids in businesses get filled faster then you think. There might be a lull in the amount of games that come out but that would quickly fill as people start supporting other companies and helping them grow to fill the gap. Yes EA going out of business would be bad but it's not going to end the world. It might me we get less games for a short while but someone would quickly fill the gap of producer with large wads of cash since people want their AAA games and will pay for them regardless of who their producer is.Das Boot said:Thing thing is Nexon couldnt afford to do a hostile takeover of EA. If anything they would have to be suggesting a merger of the two. EAs shares might be down but they are still to big of a company.
One thing you are forgetting is that EA finances and publishes games for a very large amount of small developers. You woudnt just see a drop in AAA games you would see a massive drop in everything.
They really can do worse. Take the two business models and combine them in some beautiful amalgamation of horror.Lunar Templar said:on the other hand, EA has done a lot to make me hate them, and at this point they've come to represent everything wrong with the games industry so them going away and never coming back would really be ok with me, not say it'd be better under Nexon but they can hardly do worse
That's not entirely true. It's been suggested they would become a minority owner in EA because they can't buy all their assets. However, this is still likely a stepping stone to an eventual takeover.Das Boot said:Thing thing is Nexon couldnt afford to do a hostile takeover of EA. If anything they would have to be suggesting a merger of the two. EAs shares might be down but they are still to big of a company.
Voids don't always get filled fast, though. Publishers are less and less likely to take risks these days, and want large returns. We're not as likely to see that void filled quickly right now. Additionally, just the damage done to those smaller developers could end up killing a good chunk of those devs if they can't get a new publisher right away or pretty damn close to.ultramarine486 said:Voids in businesses get filled faster then you think. There might be a lull in the amount of games that come out but that would quickly fill as people start supporting other companies and helping them grow to fill the gap. Yes EA going out of business would be bad but it's not going to end the world. It might me we get less games for a short while but someone would quickly fill the gap of producer with large wads of cash since people want their AAA games and will pay for them regardless of who their producer is.
>.> well there is that. but I'd rather not think of a company TRYING to be worse then EA.Zachary Amaranth said:They really can do worse. Take the two business models and combine them in some beautiful amalgamation of horror.Lunar Templar said:on the other hand, EA has done a lot to make me hate them, and at this point they've come to represent everything wrong with the games industry so them going away and never coming back would really be ok with me, not say it'd be better under Nexon but they can hardly do worse
I don't know if you remember the old "They got peanut butter in my chocolate" deal, but this is the opposite. This is "they got arsenic in my bleach slurpee."
Can it get worse?More Fun To Compute said:Are Nexon known for good customer service and customer friendly behaviour?