It's not 100% accurate but it's close enough. Nothing in his costume is anachronistic, a man could've worn what he had at the time it's just it would be very unlikely.GonvilleBromhead said:I appreciate that we are supposed to be looking at the pretty lady (who, I should add is very pretty), but what is annoying me is the fact that the clothing on the chap on the front cover is...very wrong. Coat fronted shirt, attached wing collar, white cuffs, hip hugging trousers...come on Irrational, do some research.
A man of that age in that period with that background wearing a wing collar and cravat is unlikely, such a man keeping his collar on borders on implausible, but a shirt that buttons all the way down and the hipsters...that's an anachronismStikibunn said:It's not 100% accurate but it's close enough. Nothing in his costume is anachronistic, a man could've worn what he had at the time it's just it would be very unlikely.GonvilleBromhead said:I appreciate that we are supposed to be looking at the pretty lady (who, I should add is very pretty), but what is annoying me is the fact that the clothing on the chap on the front cover is...very wrong. Coat fronted shirt, attached wing collar, white cuffs, hip hugging trousers...come on Irrational, do some research.
That is true however we're also talking steampunk here. The lady's costume isn't very accurate either.GonvilleBromhead said:A man of that age in that period with that background wearing a wing collar and cravat is unlikely, such a man keeping his collar on borders on implausible, but a shirt that buttons all the way down and the hipsters...that's an anachronismStikibunn said:It's not 100% accurate but it's close enough. Nothing in his costume is anachronistic, a man could've worn what he had at the time it's just it would be very unlikely.GonvilleBromhead said:I appreciate that we are supposed to be looking at the pretty lady (who, I should add is very pretty), but what is annoying me is the fact that the clothing on the chap on the front cover is...very wrong. Coat fronted shirt, attached wing collar, white cuffs, hip hugging trousers...come on Irrational, do some research.
Milla Jovovich? Oh, I love Milla Jovovich, everything she makes is pure gold... I love her so...DVS BSTrD said:She looks a little like Milla Jovovich, minus the stench of the Resident Evil movies
Nah, BioWare's already got Holly Conrad on board as their go-to Shep cosplayer:FelixG said:And next EA will be hiring her!
She does a lot of great work, I am amazed by her costumes
Granted, it's not the end of the world, but it's a huge and annoying lack of imagination... And when we talk FANTASY, if there is something everyone should DEMAND is a shit load of amounts of imagination. I mean, Emile Autumn IMPERSONATES a "wayward victorian girl", but really, EVERY woman is gonna look like that? Even a character that so far seems to be a by-the-book good girl (even if she has badass powers and can take care of herself)?blackrave said:You said as if that was a bad thing... [sub][sub]it isn't[/sub][/sub]Milanezi said:I don't think it's generic and bland. Actually, the lack of cleavage is better, every woman from steampunk fantasies and stuff look like Emilie Autumn (aka: a "wayward girl"...), and other than that, nothing really changed, in my opinion at least... And I'm on the feminist side this time, because I want her to be independent, for selfish reasons obviously: I HATE defending characters in games, so I'd rather trust the npc's instincts to cover their own ass.
Anyway great cosplay although I liked Anna's femshep better
It's pretty sad the gaming community has been so shamed by outside sources and writers/hosts within gaming journalism lately that people are terrified of finding a female character or model for a character attractive, or at least voicing it. Fearing the finger pointing and labeled an "objectifier".The Rogue Wolf said:I don't typically express this sentiment publicly, and I apologize if anyone finds it offensive/misogynistic/chauvanistic/etc., but... sweet jumpin' jehoshaphat, that woman is gorgeous. And her cosplay is pretty top-notch as well.
By generic and bland he of course actually means normal and realistic. If you compare the two images..Tarkand said:Wait what... generic and bland?
You're showing a video game character with impossible proportion... and then right beside, a beautiful woman wearing the exact same outfit, but from a different angle (Blue skirt, white corset, blue jacket - You can even see the 'cleavage window')... and you think the real woman is generic and bland?
Shesh.
The screenshot has a stylised cartoon-like quality to it. The wallpaper on the other hand takes exactly the same concepts and delivers something more in the direction of Hollywood-style realism. This is of course as the saying goes horses for courses. There really isn't a hard, solid right answer to this sort of decision of art direction unless the market decides to bankrupt your ass.Dexter111 said:I dno, I liked the character art more when they were showing it off in the Trailers:
Before the feminists went through it: http://www.oxm.co.uk/47662/features/the-oxm-breakdown-women-in-videogames/
And it turned into this:
She looks kind of bland and generic now.
I'm sure as hell not going to. I don't see why some of us would in the first place. Good on the company for hiring a gamer dedicated to cosplay.Paradoxrifts said:I do wonder however just exactly how long it will take the feminist collective to start harping on companies that hire good lookin' geeky seamstresses like this lady instead of your normal run of the mill booth babes.