Recently I started up Steam and (like it does quite often) Rust pulled an update. The update download paused, and my antivirus (I use Kaspersky) flagged some files and deleted them. Rust update incomplete... Rust unplayable.
Now I know, 99% sure Kaspersky picked up on some anti-cheating measure and this is a false positive. But here's my issue, not with the situation itself... it happens. But my problem is with some of the response on the Steam forums (and a few others.) People asking questions and starting convos about the issue (some of them, true are fairly new to pc gaming) are getting responses like "That's why I don't use (insert x brand antivirus here)" or even "I don't bother with antivirus at all, it just slows down my rig." Also seeing a lot of "I trust Steam more than (antivirus) so I just allow all from Steam."
And I think that kind of attitude is monumentally stupid.
Well, without hyperbole it isn't bright. Yes, I'm almost completely sure there isn't any serious issue here. But is RUST worth the chance? Is it IMPOSSIBLE that Facepunch has ONE dishonest person doing coding, or perhaps had a security breach of their own? Is an early access game (pretty bare bones, neat but still very much beta) worth ANY amount of risk. It wasn't necessary, but I uninstalled Rust (just to keep it from nagging me about updates and constantly trying to download files my antivirus has issues with.) In all likelihood I'll cue it up for a download in a week or 2 and the devs will have gotten their ducks in a row and fixed the problem. And every time I saw this on a forum I advised the original poster to do the same as I did.
So I guess that's the question. Is an early access game worth the chance of compromising your security, even if the chances are slim? Hell, is any game worth it? I got lots of games, if one isn't working or poses a potential risk I CAN just play another until the problem is fixed. Every forum has its share of dim people... and every game has its super-fanboys... but I was seeing a real lack of good sense in the responses.
Now I know, 99% sure Kaspersky picked up on some anti-cheating measure and this is a false positive. But here's my issue, not with the situation itself... it happens. But my problem is with some of the response on the Steam forums (and a few others.) People asking questions and starting convos about the issue (some of them, true are fairly new to pc gaming) are getting responses like "That's why I don't use (insert x brand antivirus here)" or even "I don't bother with antivirus at all, it just slows down my rig." Also seeing a lot of "I trust Steam more than (antivirus) so I just allow all from Steam."
And I think that kind of attitude is monumentally stupid.
Well, without hyperbole it isn't bright. Yes, I'm almost completely sure there isn't any serious issue here. But is RUST worth the chance? Is it IMPOSSIBLE that Facepunch has ONE dishonest person doing coding, or perhaps had a security breach of their own? Is an early access game (pretty bare bones, neat but still very much beta) worth ANY amount of risk. It wasn't necessary, but I uninstalled Rust (just to keep it from nagging me about updates and constantly trying to download files my antivirus has issues with.) In all likelihood I'll cue it up for a download in a week or 2 and the devs will have gotten their ducks in a row and fixed the problem. And every time I saw this on a forum I advised the original poster to do the same as I did.
So I guess that's the question. Is an early access game worth the chance of compromising your security, even if the chances are slim? Hell, is any game worth it? I got lots of games, if one isn't working or poses a potential risk I CAN just play another until the problem is fixed. Every forum has its share of dim people... and every game has its super-fanboys... but I was seeing a real lack of good sense in the responses.