Ok, I may have missed an earlier post and if so I am sorry.
But and here is the big butt,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMnjF1O4eH0
Sorry my embed went horribly wrong
.
No not that butt,
but a but that is is quite serious,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19120664
Now as my knowledge, of US law is limited, but since this is a civil case not a criminal case you are allowed to spring surprises on your opposite faction.
When a judge rules that evidence is not allowed due to the lateness of entry, it sort of defeats the assault or defense of our last minute witness.
In a murder case, where a person above standing is deemed too late, you are looking at a mistrial anywhere in the world.
Apple slide to lock has already been shown as a steal,but the US courts will not admit this as the patent is not applicable in the US.
A patent protects an original idea,not a theft from another region, and that is where American patent law is wrong.
I will be soon Sueing Apple for the misappropiation of the use of a tablet due to their patent diagram.
Under the patent diagram,anyone reading a tablet owes Apple money,but the Babylion empire inscribed everything onto tablets over 2000 years ago.
Until the 1920's children used a tablet to write on. Shall I go on.
Not new, not original but an adaption of technology.
You stole the IPad from Creative, live with it.
But and here is the big butt,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMnjF1O4eH0
Sorry my embed went horribly wrong
.No not that butt,
but a but that is is quite serious,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19120664
Now as my knowledge, of US law is limited, but since this is a civil case not a criminal case you are allowed to spring surprises on your opposite faction.
When a judge rules that evidence is not allowed due to the lateness of entry, it sort of defeats the assault or defense of our last minute witness.
In a murder case, where a person above standing is deemed too late, you are looking at a mistrial anywhere in the world.
Apple slide to lock has already been shown as a steal,but the US courts will not admit this as the patent is not applicable in the US.
A patent protects an original idea,not a theft from another region, and that is where American patent law is wrong.
I will be soon Sueing Apple for the misappropiation of the use of a tablet due to their patent diagram.
Under the patent diagram,anyone reading a tablet owes Apple money,but the Babylion empire inscribed everything onto tablets over 2000 years ago.
Until the 1920's children used a tablet to write on. Shall I go on.
Not new, not original but an adaption of technology.
You stole the IPad from Creative, live with it.