Sayings you dont understand

Recommended Videos

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,541
0
0
lumenadducere said:
Mr. Underson said:
"Same difference". Huh?
This one, along with "I could care less," drive me insane. Why? Because they're not the actual sayings - they've somehow been twisted into what they are now, and what they are no makes no sense whatsoever.

"Same difference" is a combination of "same thing" and "big difference." I have no idea what smacktard decided that it was a good idea to go around saying it, but I do know that I first began hearing it several years ago and had never heard it beforehand. Somebody started it, it spread like the plague, and that person needs to be backhanded.

"I could care less" also originally was "I couldn't care less" but likewise some monkey decided to remove the negative in the sentence and yet retained its current meaning. Everyone uses it to convey "I couldn't care less" but the statement itself doesn't actually say that. Whoever first said that should be smacked as well.
Except that "I could care less" still makes sense as a saying, just a different meaning. It's for when you have a tiny little bit of caring, but not much. For example, a tv show you watched a couple times and moderately enjoyed gets cancelled. You care very slightly. You could care less, but not much.
 

BanicRhys

New member
May 31, 2011
1,006
0
0
Someone saying "me three" or "me four" in response to someone saying "me too".

They didn't say "me two" fools.
 

vxicepickxv

Slayer of Bothan Spies
Sep 28, 2008
3,126
0
0
Jaythulhu said:
Not so much a saying or anything, but I get mightily confused when black americans call me "cracker" on ventrillo. No amount of googling has lead me to any understanding as to what the hell they're calling me. Down here a "cracker" is such a fuckin' good joke that it makes you laugh so hard you cry, spit drink everywhere and nearly suffocate from being unable to draw breath.

Any explanations as to WTF??!?! this means in yank-speak would be appreciated. Don't you lot call savoury biscuits crackers?
The term cracker in the American lexicon is a reference to a white person who could be a descendant of a slave owner. Slave owners used whips, and they would crack the whip. A cracker would be someone who cracks the whip.

Queen Michael said:
TheDarkEricDraven said:
"The exception that proves the rule". What the fuck does that mean? If its an exception, it doesn't prove anything!
Thank you. I've been thinking for years that it ought to be "The exception thta DISproves the rule".
The only rule that has no exceptions is that there's a exception to every rule. That would be the rule they're proving.
Pyroguekenesis said:
"I've had it up to here"
_
|
|
|
|
|
- I dunno....somewhere around that distance? I still don't get it..
This one doesn't work outside of a face to face meeting, where one can actually imply where here is with their hand.
 

FluxCapacitor

New member
Apr 9, 2009
108
0
0
To all you folks wondering about the exception that proves the rule, stop speculating if you're unsure - it's just muddying the water.

It is a legal concept that boils down to 'if we had to make an exception explicit, it means the opposite is usually true'. For example, a sign that states 'No Parking 8am - 6pm', it implies that parking is usually allowed. The rule here is that you can park on the side of the road - the fact that signs prohibit parking in certain areas proves that rule.
 

FluxCapacitor

New member
Apr 9, 2009
108
0
0
Griffolion said:
There's no such thing as a free lunch. Yes there is, it's called a board meeting.
Back in the Depression bars had to entice customers with the promise of a free lunch - but the cost of the lunch was of course subsidised by the beer the depressed punters drank once inside. The idea is that there's always a catch somewhere.
 

Buzz Killington_v1legacy

Likes Good Stories About Bridges
Aug 8, 2009
771
0
0
Iconsting said:
The use of swagger as a noun. Stop it, swagger is a verb and the context people use it as a noun in makes anyone with a basic understanding of the English language cringe in disgust.
You might want to talk to the people at Random House [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/swagger?show=1&t=1309261116] about that.
 

Chairman Miaow

CBA to change avatar
Nov 18, 2009
2,091
0
0
Ironic Pirate said:
lumenadducere said:
Mr. Underson said:
"Same difference". Huh?
This one, along with "I could care less," drive me insane. Why? Because they're not the actual sayings - they've somehow been twisted into what they are now, and what they are no makes no sense whatsoever.

"Same difference" is a combination of "same thing" and "big difference." I have no idea what smacktard decided that it was a good idea to go around saying it, but I do know that I first began hearing it several years ago and had never heard it beforehand. Somebody started it, it spread like the plague, and that person needs to be backhanded.

"I could care less" also originally was "I couldn't care less" but likewise some monkey decided to remove the negative in the sentence and yet retained its current meaning. Everyone uses it to convey "I couldn't care less" but the statement itself doesn't actually say that. Whoever first said that should be smacked as well.
Except that "I could care less" still makes sense as a saying, just a different meaning. It's for when you have a tiny little bit of caring, but not much. For example, a tv show you watched a couple times and moderately enjoyed gets cancelled. You care very slightly. You could care less, but not much.
No, it isn't. I could care less could be any amount of caring >0. You could care a great deal and care less, or you could care a tiny bit and care less. It's a saying that only tells us that you do care about something, but not how much you care.
 

jaketheripper

New member
Jan 27, 2010
476
0
0
Dango said:
"Sells like hotcakes."

What are hotcakes and why do they sell so well?
hotcakes are pancakes, and we 'mericans do love our pancakes!

:p In all honesty i can grasp the meaning of most sayings.
 

gbemery

New member
Jun 27, 2009
907
0
0
"You can't go home again." It is usually always preceded with "They say" who the hell says that? I know the meaning of it. The meaning that once you grow up and experience life that you can never go back the your childhood views of home, but this phrase makes it so dang vague. I mean if you went up to somebody and said "You can't go home again." I bet they would look at you odd for a second then most likely GO HOME...if only to make sure you didn't rape their family and burn their house down.
 

Chairman Miaow

CBA to change avatar
Nov 18, 2009
2,091
0
0
vxicepickxv said:
Pyroguekenesis said:
"I've had it up to here"
_
|
|
|
|
|
- I dunno....somewhere around that distance? I still don't get it..
This one doesn't work outside of a face to face meeting, where one can actually imply where here is with their hand.
Even so. Had enough of what? How did it get up to there? Everyone knows what it means and accepts it but even so it's gibberish.
 

GoodOmens

New member
Apr 23, 2011
54
0
0
TheDarkEricDraven said:
"The exception that proves the rule". What the fuck does that mean? If its an exception, it doesn't prove anything!
It's using an earlier meaning of the word. "Prove" used to mean something like "test," like in a proving ground. If you think of it as "the exception tests the rule" it makes perfect sense.
 

ToxicOranges

New member
Aug 7, 2010
218
0
0
Kimarous said:
I don't get how "candy ass" is supposed to be an insult. I hear that and think "My ass is candy. Candy is sweet. Hence, my ass is sweet. You think I have a sweet ass; that's a flirtatious compliment."
I smell a summer (user of 4chan) .

Seriously, the words on 4chan that appear in colour, like "newt grinch" and "candy ass" are in fact, cover ups from a swear filter. In this case, Candy ass, means fag.

If someone genuinly called you a candyass, and you've never heard of 4chan, please write back to me and tell me about it. Just write a short message on the back of a £50 note and mail to me.
 

k-ossuburb

New member
Jul 31, 2009
1,311
0
0
Kakulukia said:
CODE-D said:
Fight fire with fire-which im sure is awesome but impractical.
On the contrary. When fighting forest fires, especially when it could endanger homes, it's actually a very widespead method. You create a "border" of sorts by burning down a circle around the burning forest. Once the intentionally burnt area turns to ashes, the fire won't go any further, since ashes can't burn again.
But it's so much more fun (and a hell of a lot more efficient) to fight fires with high-velocity explosives.

OT: "There's plenty more fish in the sea."

Yeah, that would be a great help to me if I wanted to date fish.

"You can't polish a turd."

Mythbusters proved otherwise.
 

Harlief

New member
Jul 8, 2009
229
0
0
TheDarkEricDraven said:
"The exception that proves the rule". What the fuck does that mean? If its an exception, it doesn't prove anything!
A rule which doesn't exist can't be broken.
supersupersuperguy said:
I've never understood what it meant to "have one's cake and eat it too". I mean, what else are you going to do with a cake? A cake is functionally useless if you can't eat it. Unless, of course, you're going to throw it at someone, and I'm sure not going to do that. It's my cake! I have it and I'm going to eat it, too!
You can't eat your cake if you've had it already.
 

ToxicOranges

New member
Aug 7, 2010
218
0
0
Apologies if this has already been posted,

New and Improved.

That phrase simply doesn't work.

If something is:

New - it has never been thought of before. It must be an original - something new.
Improved - An improvement is the refining of an EXISTING product - something that isn't new, and may have been around for a while.

So, if something is both new and improved, it is both simultaneously new (Original) and improved (a refined version of an existing product).

Who came up with "new and improved" ? They must be trolling all of us.