"I wouldn't do that if I were you."
Well, yeah you would, since you'd be me and make the same decisions I do.
Well, yeah you would, since you'd be me and make the same decisions I do.
Either you didn't get my sarcasm, or i'm not getting yours.Danny Ocean said:It means close your book/laptop, sit down, and stop making noise. It's an order to listen.Sizzle Montyjing said:Shut up, sit down and be quiet.
I seriously have no clue to what that means, but it usually is said halfway through one of my riveting speeches.
Can anyone explain?
I always thought the person/people who split the atom must hate that phrase! "FUCKING HELL I SPLIT THE ATOM AND STILL SLICED BREAD IS THE MEASURE OF BRILLIANCE!!"Arkvoodle said:"Greatest thing since sliced bread." What the hell's so great about bread slices???
Bad grammar.People use this to imply that they have no knowledge of a particular subject.It's a double negative though so it in fact means that they do have knowledge.The proper thing to say would be "I know nothing"Alon Shechter said:"I don't know nothing."
I don't get it.
"Less haste,more speed" - this means that the faster you try to do something the more likely you are to make mistakes which may cause you to have to redo it.Therefore it's better to take your time and do something properly as it ultimately may end up being faster that wayexcusablegold said:"less haste more speed"
wait, what?
or even better:
"i dont know 'im for a bar 'o soap"
serously...why?
Same friend, this video was posted in another thread. I'm now fully up to date with them and a good few hours deprived of sleep. Love David MitchellJinxyKatte said:I hope you're happy, I was getting ready to go to sleep until you showed me that vid. Now I can't stop watching them.Kiefer13 said:This is more just a mistake rather than an actual saying, but I *really* don't understand why some people feel that the phrase "I could care less" (rather than "I couldn't care less") actually makes sense.
David Mitchell explains it better than I.
<YOUTUBE=om7O0MFkmpw>
But it's the emphasis on could. I could care less, it's entirely within the realm of possibility, but I already care so little that it is an unlikely eventuality.Chairman Miaow said:No, it isn't. I could care less could be any amount of caring >0. You could care a great deal and care less, or you could care a tiny bit and care less. It's a saying that only tells us that you do care about something, but not how much you care.Ironic Pirate said:Except that "I could care less" still makes sense as a saying, just a different meaning. It's for when you have a tiny little bit of caring, but not much. For example, a tv show you watched a couple times and moderately enjoyed gets cancelled. You care very slightly. You could care less, but not much.lumenadducere said:This one, along with "I could care less," drive me insane. Why? Because they're not the actual sayings - they've somehow been twisted into what they are now, and what they are no makes no sense whatsoever.Mr. Underson said:"Same difference". Huh?
"Same difference" is a combination of "same thing" and "big difference." I have no idea what smacktard decided that it was a good idea to go around saying it, but I do know that I first began hearing it several years ago and had never heard it beforehand. Somebody started it, it spread like the plague, and that person needs to be backhanded.
"I could care less" also originally was "I couldn't care less" but likewise some monkey decided to remove the negative in the sentence and yet retained its current meaning. Everyone uses it to convey "I couldn't care less" but the statement itself doesn't actually say that. Whoever first said that should be smacked as well.
TachyonsMrTiki said:Not necessarily. For example, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. That is a rule. There is no exception to it, and yet it is still a rule. If there was an exception to it, then it would disprove the rule.
There is the old saying that every rule has an exception. No broad rule is completely infallible. So once you start finding a few exceptions to a rule, it shows that the rule has been critically examined, weaknesses acknowledged, and still deemed to be fairly reliable. Once you know that there are exceptions, but that they are very rare, you can more safely assume that the rule is a strong one that people have tried to poke holes in, but only has a few minor leaks.TheDarkEricDraven said:"The exception that proves the rule". What the fuck does that mean? If its an exception, it doesn't prove anything!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_metaphorEverythingIncredible said:Because the bottom if your heart is supposedly deeper down into it.
Then again, that might have made more sense if it was the center and not the bottom. But back when that was invented, everything was measured in up/down.
It's a simplification of an older phrase that stated the intent more clearly. Basically what it is saying is, "To both eat your cake and also to have it AFTER YOU EAT IT. If you eat it it is gone, and you no longer have it. So the idea here is a person who wants to benefit from something more then is realistic.supersupersuperguy said:I've never understood what it meant to "have one's cake and eat it too". I mean, what else are you going to do with a cake? A cake is functionally useless if you can't eat it. Unless, of course, you're going to throw it at someone, and I'm sure not going to do that. It's my cake! I have it and I'm going to eat it, too!
If you are on a firing range right in front of the target, that is a wrong place. But if it is the right time, say, when no one is shooting, you are fine. But if it is also the wrong time, such as when people are shooting at the targets, you are in trouble, and might get shot. Anyone who happens to be in that target range/wrong place and gets shot will certainly call it the wrong time to be there.Shreder55 said:"At the wrong place at the wrong time"
Never really got it. If your at the wrong place at the wrong time then you should be fine because its the wrong time. What it should be is,
Wrong place at the right time.
or
Right place at the wrong time.
Or, a logical expanding of this phrase would be, "Made to fit your order" or "Made to your orders specifications". Personally, I think that that is the more natural interpretation, and I had to do some serious stretching to understand your interpretation.chach_face said:"Made to order"
It is meant to imply that the food is only cooked after you order it. Made to order, literally, means it is already made and then you can order it.
"Not made until you order it" would be a more apt saying
This one I had to research a tad. Theres a theory about slitting noses being a punishment for tax evaders. More reasonable seems to be the theory that a punch in the nose is a good tactic for collecting outstanding debts. But the best explanation seems to be a pun on the use of the word, "Rhino" being used as slang for money. Also, think Rhinoplasty, and you will see the nose/money connection. Im not sure there is any certainty on this, however.OutcastBOS said:"Paying through the nose". I know it means to pay a lot of money, but still!
You're not being sufficiently MachiavellianMr.PlanetEater said:"The enemy of my enemy is my friend." I have never been able to grasp this concept, I mean its sound on paper I suppose. But when you apply it in real life its really flawed logic, just because you have an enemy that has another enemy doesn't mean you and enemy of your enemy should be buddies. For all you know enemy of your enemy is also your enemy, but you guys both just happen to have a common enemy.
shadyh8er said:"It's better to have loved and lost, than to have never loved at all."
Sorry hon, but I've seen what happens to people who love and lose. It ain't pretty!
If you want to eat a bird, you can either take 1 dead bird you already have and cook it up, or you can go outside, find a bush where theses a partridge after hours of hunting, take out your gun, and hope that you can kill 1 of those 2 birds. 1 bird already on hand is a lot easier, and probably worth equal to or more then 2 potentially, after a lot of work, birds in the bush.King Toasty said:"A bird in the bush is worth two in the hand."
What?
How did you quote him if your post is above his 0.o I'm seriously scared here...Kukulski said:Actually it does make sense. You say "wrong" because the incident that occured in that particular time and space was undesirable. It is assumed that it is "wrong" for it to happen.
It is very practical in open terrain. If something is already burned then it cannot carry the fire further. That's why a controlled, easily put-out fire to burn everything in front of a burning inferno will stop it's advance. You're welcome.CODE-D said:Fight fire with fire-which im sure is awesome but impractical.
Surely it is well established in English that a double-negative is not necessarily a positive.Alon Shechter said:"I don't know nothing."
I don't get it.
Demonstrate that they exist, and we'll talk.Andrew Pate said:TachyonsMrTiki said:Not necessarily. For example, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. That is a rule. There is no exception to it, and yet it is still a rule. If there was an exception to it, then it would disprove the rule.
Damnit, I'm not even green I'm so clean... Ah well, no time-travel for meKukulski said:You need to have your forum health meter in the red to be able to do that.brandon237 said:How did you quote him if your post is above his 0.o I'm seriously scared here...
That's from the older meaning of "prove" which is "test" so it's putting the rule to the test.TheDarkEricDraven said:"The exception that proves the rule". What the fuck does that mean? If its an exception, it doesn't prove anything!
Cheers thar friendThe Brewin said:xchurchx said:I live in cornwall and there are hundreds sayings over here such as A1 meaning im ok
but the one i dont get which i heard my mother speak recently is "Butter wouldn't melt in your mouth" which some how means you are too nice :l how does it?
Your misreading this one, the term in its fullest is more akin to 'she acts like butter wouldn't melt in her mouth'. The phrase is not so much that the person is too good, but rather, they act and present themselves that they are so good, even butter wouldn't melt in their mouth (essentially your claiming you are so good, the impossible is possible)
Hope that helps
I always thought this one was odd...OutcastBOS said:"Paying through the nose". I know it means to pay a lot of money, but still!
Wrong way round. A bird in the hand, that you've actually succeeded in catching for dinner, is worth twice as much as one that you know is out there somewhere but haven't actually managed to grab yet.King Toasty said:"A bird in the bush is worth two in the hand."
What?