Well, there you go then. At least there's some way to disprove it.nuba km said:I think you misunderstand, mist is not smoke they are very different. smoke is ashes from something burning going up into the sky because they have more energy from the heat so they go higher into the atmosphere so there for it rises to the ceiling. mist on the other hand are frozen particles light enough to make a gas like state and due to the lack of energy they sink to the bottom so they are on the floor. a better thing to disprove the statement is the fact you can get smoke from burning your hand on something like a kettle meaning smoke without fireQueen Michael said:Well, there you go, then.nuba km said:actually smoke machines use the mist from dry ice and a fan.Queen Michael said:Your hate is righteous, but you forgot to name one reason: It's not true. Aren't there smoke machines around that can create smoke without putting stuff on fire?nuba km said:Is there a saying you hate. is it because it is stupid, out of date or just doesn't make sense. well then start ranting for I will find it amusing hahahahaha.
I hate the saying 'there is no smoke without fire' because people use it just to defend gossip
e.g.
"John funk is actually a satanic unicorn that is trying to take over the world"
"that's a lie"
"there's no smoke without fire"