The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
You focused on one bit, not the others. It looked like I only reccomended AoE1
Ah, ok, I cut it down so I only posted the part directly relevant to what I had to say, so you'd immediately know what I was talking about, like I did with this quote. Its just how I post I guess.
The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
To be honest, I haven't played AoE since the disk scratched to hell, I just remember enjoying it. Are Mongolians in AoE1? In AoE2 I'd say the teutons are best...
I can't say for sure, I don't even remember if they were really mongolians, or just horseback archers; just that, historically, devastating, unstoppable use of his horseback archers is most associated with Mongolians.
EDIT:
Vrach said:
Because 10 years of development, an unprecedented 100 million bucks of budget (did they actually put more money into that than into an average MMO?) and 13 years of video game industry advancement offer no technological advantage at all.
Woah woah, easy chocolate, that was sincere.
My best memories of Age of Empires are doing exactly what I described. I loved getting scores of horse archers, running by the enemy base, kiting away any army they sent at you with attack move, pumping volley after volley after volley into slow moving Centurions and Legions, then returning to raze the now defenceless production buildings.
Sure, I probably wouldn't find it exciting, or even very fun today, and yes, I do think Starcraft is a superior RTS, but
Lake Deuteronomy said:
be[ing] the mongolians and just roflstomp the shit out of everything
endeared me to Age of Empires.