Puzzlenaut said:
Xiado said:
Wrong, it's not science. Like Martial artists, Knights were trained since their youth in armor. They wore it like a second skin from childhood. I carry a 50 pound pack while hiking long distances, and after a few days, it feels like less than half the weight. People don't understand today the meaning of "bred for battle", but the Knights spent a ridiculous amount of time training to be soldiers. US Marines, on the other hand spend a few months. Try to understand the difference.
You forget that knights weren't necessarily particularly good soldiers, and they rarely even fought -- they were just aristocrats who "led" the armies and acted as figureheads, wearing huge expensive armour to preserve their measly hides.
Knights were never an elite order, they were just rich kids sitting in for the people who really knew what they were doing.
That is a gross misconception and oversimplification as I've ever heard one. A knight's life consisted of mostly nothing but combat (I'm not even going to go into the arduous 12 year training periods pages would go through in order to even be considered for knighthood, go read a book). Even when they weren't off fighting for their king to earn their livelihoods, they were participating in elaborate war games disguised as tournaments.
Yes, knights tended to be members of the aristocracy and some might have used their wealth to buy themselves out of military service (which would go on to pay for the fitting and training of additional foot soldiers, all's fair). However, wealthy heritage does NOT equal wealthy individuals. Inheritance laws of the time only rewarded the firstborn son of the household, most knights were not those lucky few. Army wages provided by the king were piss poor even then, the majority of a knight's income would come from fiefs rewarded to them for their military services and pillaging rights secured by their active participation in battle. Let's not forget that knights had to provide their own weapons, armor, and horses, of which a large portion of their earnings would go into upkeep costs. If you want to know the cost of a fully fitted and trained warhorse back then, imagine a fighter pilot having to pay for their own plane, fuel, and ammo.
"they were just aristocrats who "led" the armies and acted as figureheads, wearing huge expensive armour to preserve their measly hides."
ALL armor was expensive, genius. The especially GOOD pieces more so. Medieval knights were the equivalent of the modern tank, they used their armor and horses to plow through the enemy lines with minimal damage to their own person. What good would be a tank made of glass that you could only use once?