I see what you did their....omicron1 said:I can see things getting a bit hairy with this method. But as long as their funds fon't get frozen, and they don't pack their trunks and hide, this will be a mammoth accomplishment.
Still, I'd like more sources. I don't like taking stories of this magnitude on earsay.
Jurassic Park....... But with mammoths....Distorted Stu said:One step closer to a real life Jurrasic Park...
I'm sure they can, they just need to find the right fossil, something of the dino encased in ice which would let scientists get a DNA sample . As far as my understanding goes, the Paleo-Eocene Thermal Maximum (the original Global Warming) pretty much melted all the ice on the surface of the Earth.Sigmar ov The Hammer said:Jurassic Park....... But with mammoths....Distorted Stu said:One step closer to a real life Jurrasic Park...
If they could bring back other beasts from that era, that'd be great.
Wait...-whose- 'twisted amusement' exactly are you referring to? I don't see where the article mentions that this is case. But of course, I'm sure a bunch of scientists have nothing better to do with their time then resurrect dead mammals for fun. :/spartan231490 said:Why? What purpose does this serve except our own twisted amusement. Let the past die, the world is no longer a place for mammoths. Fuck, we can barely take care of the species that are already on this planet, why are we trying to add more.
They will probably call it abominiation and try to outlaw them because its against work of god etc. etc. you know the story.YogSothoth said:HAH! Take that religion, we are going to bring back a species that "god" wanted dead.
I also would appreciate more sources on this matter. The way the stories are written, I don't think they really understand the magnitude of what this means. It's one thing to clone a house cat, but it's another thing altogether to do it with an animal that hasn't been around in 10,000 years. Also, this will only further the misconception of what genetics actually means, which annoys me a bit.AugustFall said:Can anyone help me find a source? I don't doubt this is true but I'd like to read the original. So far the Escapist's post links to another website who's sources are The Daily Mail, Fox News and Huffington Post.
The DNA of the mammoth is still in tact, they also reckon that the elephant is a close enough relative for it to potentially work. I got my sauce at The Register.Baresark said:I also would appreciate more sources on this matter. The way the stories are written, I don't think they really understand the magnitude of what this means. It's one thing to clone a house cat, but it's another thing altogether to do it with an animal that hasn't been around in 10,000 years. Also, this will only further the misconception of what genetics actually means, which annoys me a bit.AugustFall said:Can anyone help me find a source? I don't doubt this is true but I'd like to read the original. So far the Escapist's post links to another website who's sources are The Daily Mail, Fox News and Huffington Post.