Security Tech of the Future Like Minority Report

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Security Tech of the Future Like Minority Report



It might not be telepathic, but the security checkpoints of the future will be able to predict what people will be planning on doing before they actually do it.

For all that it might be necessary, going through security screening at an airport can be a real pain in the neck - especially if it's a busy day. Those days will eventually come to an end, reports TechFragments [http://techfragments.com/news/142/Tech/Futuristic_Security_Checkpoints_Know_What_You_Do_Before_You_Do_It.html], with the development of new security technology that can effectively predict one's actions before it happens.

The system, dubbed FAST (Future Attribute Screening Technology,) uses incredibly precise cameras to track minute variations in things such as the rate someone blinks, their pupil size, where they're looking, and so on. Combined with a laser system that tracks heart rate and respiration, and a thermal camera that monitors one's body temperature, FAST has already demonstrated promise even in the early stages of development. Back in September, a Homeland Security test of the system found that out of 140 subjects, FAST could accurately determine hostile intent with a 78% detection rate, and an 80% detection rate for intent to deceive.

The numbers aren't high enough to put FAST into the field right away, but for such an early stage in the project's lifetime, the technology certainly is impressive.

Still, is the convenience of just walking quickly through a security checkpoint worth any potential ambiguity in the system - whether catching innocent people or letting dangerous ones slip through the cracks?

What do you all think?

Permalink
 

incal11

New member
Oct 24, 2008
517
0
0
I can't trust this stuff ; and I can give one valable argument:
What if I am just in a bad mood ?
 

pulpitus

New member
May 19, 2008
5
0
0
I think I'm going to start an airport for those who would like to take the chance. No security except a locked cockpit door. And if it should happen that it got highjacked, the pilots would be instructed to crash the fucking thing in the water!

But on topic, if it works it's a good idea, IF it speeds up the process getting from A to B otherwise it's just more expensive junk. a few hundred people here and there is acceptable casualties since flying is the safest form of travel. You know that all form of transportation could kill you, and if some loony pulls a toothbrush on you in a plane it is a calculated risk. If you want to avoid highjacking equip all employees with a weapon of sorts. (stun gun?) which would solve most of the problems.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
sirdanrhodes said:
Invasion of privacy much?
Personally, I'm quite content with Airport security knowing what kind of mood I'm in if it further increases the chances that the plane won't get blown up or smashed into a building.

Anyways, not as much bs as Minority Report's version, you'd get arrested before you even decided to do something wrong.
 

Sennz0r

New member
May 25, 2008
1,353
0
0
incal11 said:
I can't trust this stuff ; and I can give one valable argument:
What if I am just in a bad mood ?
I completely agree. What if you just had a bad day or had a fight with your girlfriend/boyfriend/whatever?
I mean this may sound insane but sometimes when I'm going somewhere my mind wanders off into thinking about slitting the throat of the guy who's looking at me funny (nuts right?)

Anyway if that happens I'll be locked up in a room and will be interrogated for hours explaining how I just had one of my sick mind moments.
 

incal11

New member
Oct 24, 2008
517
0
0
Sorry , bad connection , I refreshed and somehow it reposted my message .
if a mod see this post , please delete it
 

mrjinx

New member
Dec 31, 2008
93
0
0
I don't think we are to the point that we know enough about the human brain to use something like this.

I'm sure it will incorrectly accuse someone of bad intent when they are just in a bad mood. Then they miss their flight for no reason other then, 'Your zen just wasn't right'.

Chill man...
 

Zerbye

New member
Aug 1, 2008
202
0
0
This technology is a close approximation of good old fashion lie-detector autonomic measurements. The neat bit of it seems to be the ease of application...no elaborate wire setup to test each person. As neat as it is, it suffers from all the same limitations: e.g. people able to control their heart rate/pupil dilation/etc can sneak by the system, and false detection of jittery folks as "iffy".

I suspect that people detected by this new system would go to another line, rather than get thrown directly into an interrogation cell. This line would probably be more like what we're used to nowadays. Of course, I'm talking out of my ass here...who knows what the plans are?

Still, it appears very possibile that a "hostile risk" could slip past this system, which sacrifices today's "thoroughness" for convenience. The selling point of convenience is great, but at what cost?
 

xitel

Assume That I Hate You.
Aug 13, 2008
4,618
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
FAST - Federation Against Software Theft

Coincidence?
Yes, they plan to read your mind and arrest you before you pirate software again, you dirty criminal mastermind.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
xitel said:
The_root_of_all_evil said:
FAST - Federation Against Software Theft

Coincidence?
Yes, they plan to read your mind and arrest you before you pirate software again, you dirty criminal mastermind.
Well, I wouldn't steal a baby. [http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=d82Lq2rVB_4]
 

Calobi

New member
Dec 29, 2007
1,504
0
0
Hostile intent to them means being told that the person should do something. If I just sat near it and told everyone entering the building that by boarding they're helping me do something, would that make them more likely to show up as "hostile"?

If you just have to walk through, I'm hosed. I have a higher body temperature than normal, I'm usually flushed, have heart palpitations, look around for cameras (I like to see them seeing me), and look shady (long hair, unshaven, teenage male).

The future's so bright, just not for me.
 

CarlosYenrac

New member
Nov 20, 2007
104
0
0
Calobi said:
If you just have to walk through, I'm hosed. I have a higher body temperature than normal, I'm usually flushed, have heart palpitations, look around for cameras (I like to see them seeing me), and look shady (long hair, unshaven, teenage male).

The future's so bright, just not for me.
^^^^^^^
this. What about those of us with a slighty higher than normal body temperature?
 

HobbesMkii

Hold Me Closer Tony Danza
Jun 7, 2008
856
0
0
I read years ago that we could expect some sort of airport security where it was essentially a room that used retina to identify you, as well as sensors and x-rays to make sure you weren't carrying anything you weren't supposed to have. It was supposed to end the worthless and time-consuming TSA. Needless to say, it hasn't happened yet, and it probably won't. I personally don't like all these "New Technology Promises New Innovations!" reports because most of them amount to nadda. They'll tell you by 2020, but they mean by 2075.
 

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
stompy said:
Grand_Poohbah said:
THOUGHT POLICE!
Took the words right out of my mouth.
I also no longer have words in my mouth. It's getting kinda lonely in there.

I'm against this. Thoughts/emotions are not actions, and aren't always indicative of future actions. This seems like the kind of gadget that'd do well in the LAB, but might really mess up in real situations.