Zachary Amaranth said:
Therumancer said:
Bayonetta was an interesting game, I liked it more than I thought I would.
That said, having just finished listening to Bob's "Big Picture" video for this week, I have gaming politics on my mind, and I wouldn't be surprised if finances have less to do with it than you might think.
Bayonetta was actually pretty well received, it didn't have majority dislike, just a lot of vocal people who like to QQ about the artwork of women in fantasy and games like the DOA franchise who jumped on this game as well. It rated well, sold really well in Japan apparently, and made money internationally. A sequel would be safe money under most circumstances.
However a second term by Obama might be a very unfriendly enviroment for any kind of video game with potentially touchy content. He won't have to worry about re-election, and his still carrying around Hillary with him apparently. Video games are one of his favorite scapegoats to avoid other issues when discussing everything from social policy to children's health. The president can't set policy but he CAN influance it, and a second term of Obama will have him looking to set down a legacy, and going after video games are a "safe" target for him to try and do so.
So basically I wouldn't be surprised if Sega and other publishers are laying low with projects like this until theyknow what is going to happen. Elections favor the incumbant, so the odds are things could go badly for a game like this.
If Mitt wins, you'll probably see this project and others picked up again by coincidence. Not so much because Mitt is some bastion of tolerance for extreme and fringe media, but being in his first term he won't be willing to throw down on issues like that in a big way for four years at least.
All I can say is "lol conspiracy theories."
Not really applicable here. A conspiricy theory requires a large group of people to be working covertly towards a specific end that would otherwise be opposed. What I'm saying isn't really covert as Obama and Hillary have been quite public on using video games as a scapegoat:
Obama:
http://www.myce.com/news/pres-obama-continues-anti-video-game-crusade-20004/
http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/02/20/obama-campaign-theme-video-games-as-metaphor-for-underachievement
Hillary's most famous stance:
http://www.gamespot.com/news/hillary-clinton-to-take-on-rockstar-over-hot-coffee-6129021
That's just the tip of the iceberg if you look at it. As this can be found easily it's not "conspiricy" material. I just didn't post links because I've already covered this in detail in other posts (which is usually why I don't bother).
My point is that someone who is actually looking at the facts, and whose business is video games, might be wary about releasing a game as sexually charged and violent as Bayonetta with this administration entering it's second term given their use of the industry as a whipping boy. Given that Bayonetta arguably went further than "Hot Coffee" did, and didn't need it's content to be unlocked with mods or work arounds (by this I look at certain lesbian bondage executions as an example), a proper sequel that pushes things even further probably has the industry concerned.
Right now it seems that the left wing likes to claim anything negative about Obama and his camp is a "conspiricy theory" even when the guy is on record. Let's be blunt, the guy is not an especially good president, and what little agenda he has is as wonky as can be. For the first term he was relatively harmless as he had to be concerned about re-election, but when it comes to a second term you have to be concerned about all the insanity the guy has been spouting over the last four years. His supporters in the media generally aren't focusing on things that might negatively impact his campaign, but that doesn't mean it's a conspiricy or isn't out there.
To put this into perspective, Obama is someone who is after the youth vote. Needless to say you aren't seeing his attitude about video games, and blaming them for "youth under achievement" and similar things that are far more complicated coming out in the media very often, especially not where that youth vote might notice. I doubt many young adults would want to support a censor like this if they knew what his attitudes actually are, not to mention Hillary playing Robin to his Batman. I doubt many young adults right now (due to the passage of years) even know what role Hillary played in "Hot Coffee", and some just now voting might not even be aware of that entire situation. Someone whose business is in video games however has to consider this.
I'll also go so far as to say that right now the sheer amount of Obama support on forums like this one show a high degree of ignorance, since he is very much the anti-video game cantidate, not because Romney is a huge supporter of video games, but because Obama is in a position where he's likely to be able to do something if he's re-elected. I blame ignorance rather than any kind of conspiricy theory... people who really don't pay attention, check the facts, or remember what they already knew when it's important. As a gamer, or just someone involved in attached aspects of fandom, getting Obama and his administration out before a second term should be the #1 priority. Of course to be fair we'd probably want Mitt out before a second term as well.