I imagine that the Dreamcast probably would have kept Sega alive if it cost a bit more and had a DVD player in it.The Great JT said:Oh Sega, if only you could've kept your shit together in the early 2000's, who knows.
anything I've ever read about playstations origins indicate it was a Nintendo/Sony joint venture ...hell if you compare the Playstion 1 and SNES controllers you can see the shared heritage....achilleas.k said:Vault Citizen said:wait, I thought that tye Playstation was a failed thing between Nintendo and Sony, where does SEGA fit in?CrystalShadow said:Huh. So Sega Rejected Sony as well?
How did this work out exactly?
From a design perspective, the Playstation being a derivative of an SNES CD unit makes sense looking at the controller, but now Sega factors into it as well somehow?
Did Sony run into problems with Nintendo and then take it's plans to Sega or something? Weird.I had the exact same thought as VaultCitizen and CrystalShadow while reading. I distinctly remember a SNES CD being in the works back in the day. Then when the idea was scrapped the Playstation was born and everyone always wondered what would've happened if Sony just stuck with Nintendo.WOPR said:I've no idea what you're talking about, the only Nintendo vs Sony thing I can think of is the Release of Final Fantasy 7
it started on the SNES, was moved to the 64 (made 3D), then when they saw the PlayStation they saw how much they could fit on DISKS (instead of cartridges)
...that's really the only "Nintendo vs Sony" I can think of for the age
and the reason the N64/GC didn't have normal CD's (or any CD's) like everyone else was because Nintendo was aiming at giving games low loading times, instead of fancy graphics
Can someone clear that up?
Quoting Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playstation]:
"The console's origins date back to 1986 where it was originally a joint project between Nintendo and Sony to create a CD-ROM for the Super Famicom/SNES console." (reference: "Game Over", by David Scheff).
It was on the last pageTailstheHedgehog said:The SEGA Sammy takeover wasn't mentioned?
How many people bother study history, especially when it's not their own. Sony is treading on some very thin ice here, but isn't in the exact same position as Sega was. When you were talking about Sega, you were talking about a company, when you talk about Sony, you're talking about a division.Void(null) said:Anyone else see Sony following the same trend as Sega against Nintendo?
Both focused on specs and technology instead of a great library of games and fun, and who exactly is Sonys frontman?
When I say Nintendo you think of Mario, Link, Zelda and Peach, Samus, Kirby and more.
When I say Sony what do you think? I first and foremost think "Walkman" and then think "Metal Gear and Grand Turismo." Metal Gear started with Nintendo and their is a 3DS version planned and GT hardly has a face to it.
I loved the PSX to death, it was an amazing machine with a great Library. The PS2 also was an amazing machine with a great library. The PS3 and PSP have struggled and seeing Sonys plans for the PSP2 (And hell, their handling of the PSP and PS3) really makes me question their direction.
I really would love to see Sony come out swinging strong come the next generation but I see them going the way of the Dreamcast. Great hardware but with all their support and library stripped away it loses all its umpf.
Sega is better off "dead" in my mind, however It would be nice of that "death" was a lesson to others rather than history repeated.
The trouble is, the Japanese and North American markets were the "Big Two" for console gaming back then. The rest of the world was a distant third as far as console sales were concerned. So, yes the SMS was very successful in Europe and South America. But the markets in Japan and North America was where the money was.luas_dublin said:US centric article is US Centric.
The SMS outsold the NES in Europe and most Markets outside the US/Japan.
It had a smaller "slim" style version released alongside the Megadrive 2.
It had releases up until the mid nineties, and was regarded as being a better , cheaper and more reliable machine the the NES.
Hardly a failure eh?
well said sir!Nurb said:Dammit Sega, being a fan of you is like being a fan of the Chicago Bears... You put on a good show, but completely choke when it counts.
Nice link, thanks for sharing! : )2up said:I don't really visit IGN anymore, but I remember them having a nice article written about the history of SEGA a few years back.
http://retro.ign.com/articles/974/974695p1.html