I've read your first reply and I don't see how it relates to what I said.lacktheknack said:You're... you're not reading my first reply to you, are you? Or are you misunderstanding it, or reading things into it I never intended to have there?AnarchistFish said:Not just in more developed countrieslacktheknack said:Uh... yes... that's what I was implying... Try re-reading...AnarchistFish said:Everyone everywhere whines about thingslacktheknack said:No, first-world countries can have actual problems (being dragged to court and being sued because you spilled coffee on someone is an actually serious problem that typically only happens in first-world countries).AnarchistFish said:I guess my problem is that it bugs me how people categorise between a "first world" and a "third world". In how it assumes people who live in wealthier countries aren't entitled to have their own grievances, how it assumes that people in poorer countries won't have similar grievances and how it implies that development is black and white like that.
"First world problems" was SUPPOSED to reference people who claim their "day is ruined" because they dropped their soda or couldn't find bean sprouts in the fridge or got a Mercedes in the wrong shade of pink. It got hijacked by the internet and made into a "quit whining about things" shortcut, because that's what the internet does.
See EeveeElectro's posts for a good example of what First World Problems are supposed to be.
I agree that people whine about things, and that it's funny to take the piss out of that.
My objection is just against the whole premise of guilt built around it and the assumption that people in these countries will always have it better.