Sherlock Holmes is public domain... That is why there can be Sherlock, Elementary and a number of other concurrent adaptations of it without being considered plagiarism.Dr. Crawver said:Mostly because (as far as I know) up to this point they've always been original characters not having been spawned in other IP's. This however is an already established character, as well as being quite a big part of British and English culture, and even a little it in international culture.SweetShark said:It is my poison.....I NEED THIS NOW!!!
Also the characters of this series NEVER MADE SENSE!
Why SO Serious?
You can debate how important people should take this, but is a different situation to normal.
I never said anything about it being plagiarism or about it being public domain. Simply that he is an already existing character, which is different to other Ace Attorney characters.hermes200 said:Sherlock Holmes is public domain... That is why there can be Sherlock, Elementary and a number of other concurrent adaptations of it without being considered plagiarism.Dr. Crawver said:Mostly because (as far as I know) up to this point they've always been original characters not having been spawned in other IP's. This however is an already established character, as well as being quite a big part of British and English culture, and even a little it in international culture.SweetShark said:It is my poison.....I NEED THIS NOW!!!
Also the characters of this series NEVER MADE SENSE!
Why SO Serious?
You can debate how important people should take this, but is a different situation to normal.
And this is far from the weirdest Holmes and Watson's representation...
But there has been differences in the characters that goes beyond the physical representations too.Dr. Crawver said:I never said anything about it being plagiarism or about it being public domain. Simply that he is an already existing character, which is different to other Ace Attorney characters.hermes200 said:Sherlock Holmes is public domain... That is why there can be Sherlock, Elementary and a number of other concurrent adaptations of it without being considered plagiarism.Dr. Crawver said:Mostly because (as far as I know) up to this point they've always been original characters not having been spawned in other IP's. This however is an already established character, as well as being quite a big part of British and English culture, and even a little it in international culture.SweetShark said:It is my poison.....I NEED THIS NOW!!!
Also the characters of this series NEVER MADE SENSE!
Why SO Serious?
You can debate how important people should take this, but is a different situation to normal.
And this is far from the weirdest Holmes and Watson's representation...
And I'm sure it might not be. There's one where they're both mice, I even think there's one where he's a cyborg. However they've all got traits in common. What we're looking at here I will be honestly astounded if it even closely resembles what the Watson character id meant to be.
The reason why it bothers me is because Sherlock and Watson are significant parts of the English culture and folklore, like robin hood. It's similar I imagine if for Americans they took Uncle Sam and made him a stereotypical anime protagonist who yells at everything and is as thick as a brick. To some of us it can be an issue.