Your wheelchair analogy refers to a completely different kind of freedom. We are talking about freedom in regard to rights given by the government, not freedom in regard to physical limitations. What you said is like comparing WWII to Vietnam. Totally different situations.HappyPillz said:I have to say I disagree. Some of these people live on wheelchairs and can't even feed themselves. What part about their lives are 'free'?Pirate Kitty said:Yup.
Anything else wouldn't be freedom.
OT: I realy don't think they should. Not to be mean, but why would anyone want to dilute and weaken the speacies by encouraging the reproduction of the weakest links? Of course it would also depend if their mental condition is genetic or not.
In other news, as someone said earlier, I don't think it's my place to decide. Obviously there is SOME sort of mental clarity needed for two mentally handicapped individuals to become pregnant in the first place, so I think from there it's up to them, their doctors, and their family/guardians.
For all other situations...well, frankly, there are just too many situations and possibilities for one sweeping "law" to cover. There are too many different types and levels of severity of mental illnesses, and too many ways to gauge mental clarity to fairly justify something like that.
Plus, I think it sets a bad precedent for the future. Assuming we're talking about America here: we get bent out of shape when we're told we can't protest at a soldier's funeral. So how is it anywhere NEAR alright to tell people we don't know whether or not they can have children?
And besides, if they do prove to be incapable of properly managing their children, there are already systems in place to handle that.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness applies to ALL Americans. Any other situations must be dealt with on a case by case basis, on a personal level, not a federal level.