Yeah, it probably has something to do with the spring forward (my time-stamp is an hour behind my clocks) I posted on a discussion and my comment was above the OP'sthaluikhain said:EDIT: Odd, the post below mine was visible before I posted this, and it says it was posted 7 minutes in teh future.
Agreed, the whole universe is out there waiting for us, there's gotta be somethin' out there. Even if it's not a whole civilized culture, there has to be a market for extraterritorial pets.Daystar Clarion said:Well yeah.
We ain't gonna find all that Prothean tech on Mars by sitting on our arses.
I think sending man to Mars is pretty pointless. I mean don't get me wrong, it would be one awesome feat and something that publically would gain huge interest, but whats to be found there? Years of probes and rovers have pretty much shown its just a huge, barren wasteland. Unless we were planning on colonizing it somehow, I think its nothing more than just a symbolic (and very expensive) mission.Daystar Clarion said:Well yeah.
We ain't gonna find all that Prothean tech on Mars by sitting on our arses.
But it would provide valuable practical experience for future long range missions (Titan, anyone?)ThatPurpleGuy said:I think sending man to Mars is pretty pointless. I mean don't get me wrong, it would be one awesome feat and something that publically would gain huge interest, but whats to be found there? Years of probes and rovers have pretty much shown its just a huge, barren wasteland. Unless we were planning on colonizing it somehow, I think its nothing more than just a symbolic (and very expensive) mission.Daystar Clarion said:Well yeah.
We ain't gonna find all that Prothean tech on Mars by sitting on our arses.
Yes it would but sending people as opposed to robots/rover style vehicles makes things ALOT more complicated than it already is. I guess what I am saying is that space exploration is probably best done by technology rather than always having to send actual people. Sending people really adds to the buzz but doesn't necessarily achieve more and like I said makes things much more complex. You also have to bring them back.MrPeanut said:But it would provide valuable practical experience for future long range missions (Titan, anyone?)ThatPurpleGuy said:I think sending man to Mars is pretty pointless. I mean don't get me wrong, it would be one awesome feat and something that publically would gain huge interest, but whats to be found there? Years of probes and rovers have pretty much shown its just a huge, barren wasteland. Unless we were planning on colonizing it somehow, I think its nothing more than just a symbolic (and very expensive) mission.Daystar Clarion said:Well yeah.
We ain't gonna find all that Prothean tech on Mars by sitting on our arses.
Agreed. They really have to start thinking 'outside the box' or we really can't do much. Even the simplest of projects (and nothing is simple in space exploration) cost 100's of millions and there is never the guarantee it would work. Even though I love everything space, even I can see the point of view of throwing billions at something thats hard to see any real result is always going to be a hardsell to governments. "wealthy enthusiasts" are our best hope.Esotera said:We need to encourage private competition above all else, as this is going to massively drive down the cost of getting mass into space, which is currently our main obstacle to the stars. I'd go as far to say as we should be entirely cutting government space programs & just have cash prizes for achieving various efficiencies, like a manned shuttle flight costing under £1m, etc.
There was a guy who managed to send his iphone into subspace for about $700...I think that's insane, no government agency would be able to do that. Companies like SpaceX are gradually getting there through satellite launches. And I wouldn't be too surprised if Google decided to get in on the space race in the next few decades...they already fund a few competitions for it, and it seems like something they'd do.ThatPurpleGuy said:Agreed. They really have to start thinking 'outside the box' or we really can't do much. Even the simplest of projects (and nothing is simple in space exploration) cost 100's of millions and there is never the guarantee it would work. Even though I love everything space, even I can see the point of view of throwing billions at something thats hard to see any real result is always going to be a hardsell to governments. "wealthy enthusiasts" are our best hope.
Wow, I haven't heard of that. I have heard of SpaceX though. Still these aren't private companies in the traditional sense, as in build something and turn profit. They just see the gaining of knowledge as the profit, even though financially they will never make a return. Thats why the corporate world never really gets involved in this stuff as they are too profit driven. The wealthy enthusiast style companies run it more like a very expensive hobby.Esotera said:There was a guy who managed to send his iphone into subspace for about $700...I think that's insane, no government agency would be able to do that. Companies like SpaceX are gradually getting there through satellite launches. And I wouldn't be too surprised if Google decided to get in on the space race in the next few decades...they already fund a few competitions for it, and it seems like something they'd do.ThatPurpleGuy said:Agreed. They really have to start thinking 'outside the box' or we really can't do much. Even the simplest of projects (and nothing is simple in space exploration) cost 100's of millions and there is never the guarantee it would work. Even though I love everything space, even I can see the point of view of throwing billions at something thats hard to see any real result is always going to be a hardsell to governments. "wealthy enthusiasts" are our best hope.
Wait what?LordOfInsanity said:Simple answer? Yes. Slightly more detailed answer? Definitely yes.
If it wasn't for the space race 40-50 years ago, society today would not be as it is. Modern Medicine, technology, heck even the Internet can be attributed to the race for space so long ago. If we had continued the emphasis on space, even after the USSR fell, we possibly could have had flying cars and jet packs by now! Of course that's all silly thinking, but truthfully, we may have better understanding of the process of cancer to combat it better, we'd be able to understand and learn a lot more things. Who knows where technology would be if we kept doing space stuff other than probes and a meager ISS. Possibly start of a moon colony already, maybe we could have been to Mars. So much stuff yet because of *how expensive it is*, we can't. Wars are more expensive than space exploration right now. Both in monetary value and manpower.
Mars is very rich in certain minerals that could be used to kick start further exploration of the solar system. On top of that, the distances in space aren't really that prohibitive. There is no doubt that as we continue to miniaturize computers and find more and more efficient forms of energy (we've begun work on some of the first Nuclear Fusion plants out in Europe, that's a giant leap forward if we can get them to work) that at some point we will have the ability to build ships that can take us outside this solar system. I tend to think intergalactic travel is less likely, but assuming we survive to spread out among the milky-way, it will probably occur at some point, it's the natural evolution of technology.ThatPurpleGuy said:I think sending man to Mars is pretty pointless. I mean don't get me wrong, it would be one awesome feat and something that publically would gain huge interest, but whats to be found there? Years of probes and rovers have pretty much shown its just a huge, barren wasteland. Unless we were planning on colonizing it somehow, I think its nothing more than just a symbolic (and very expensive) mission.Daystar Clarion said:Well yeah.
We ain't gonna find all that Prothean tech on Mars by sitting on our arses.