It bothers me that you're so wrong about that. Someone still died for no clear reason at all. Of course you could argue that he only suspected the guy in the first place because he was black, but that's not even the issue being argued.dathwampeer said:We immediately assume the gun was a plant. Why? reverse racism. Really it's just racism but it's done by white people against other white people.
He may have acted a little rash and that had a massive consequence. That's very unfortunate but if the police officer had reason to believe he was fleeing the scene of something then it's his duty to stop him. If the kid who died had of been white this would never have been an issue. And that's what bothers me.
First off watch the damn video before you are willing to destroy this cops life. Otherwise don't bother commenting.AvsJoe said:Okay, fair enough. That's more than enough proof to have this guy thrown in jail for a lengthy sentence.Thedayrecker said:The story's 10 months old, and the details are based of interviews with witnesses, the officer's report, and the officer's dashboard camera.AvsJoe said:Yes. Yes he should. But I get the feeling I'm not hearing the entire story here.
That there was a gun is immaterial. The officer himself (as stated in the OP) changed his story from believing that the kid was in a bank robbery, to tazing him because he didn't have a bike light on. That there were no fingerprints on the gun is suspicious, most people hold guns with their hands and gloves weren't mentioned. If you've watched the video, officers are seen manipulating the body.dathwampeer said:We immediately assume the gun was a plant. Why? reverse racism. Really it's just racism but it's done by white people against other white people.
He may have acted a little rash and that had a massive consequence. That's very unfortunate but if the police officer had reason to believe he was fleeing the scene of something then it's his duty to stop him. If the kid who died had of been white this would never have been an issue. And that's what bothers me.
Stop ignoring logic just because you're afraid that what you might say could be taken as racist by someone who is frankly, probably hyper sensitive. Everyone's so goddammed afraid of their own shadow these days.
The man killed someone without provocation and, as punishment, received two weeks unpaid suspension and you're asking if he should be more severely punished? Is that question rhetorical?Thedayrecker said:This particular incident happened in October of last year, and in April, Ard was put on a two-week, unpaid suspension.
Now I ask you, esteemed Escapist, should officer Ard be more severly punished?
Racist because it was a black kid? learn the definition of racismstormtrooper9091 said:and he's obviously a racist asshole