Shows that Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot

Recommended Videos

ExDeath730

New member
Mar 13, 2012
150
0
0
TravelerSF said:
Imma have to keep bashing Naruto with others. It's ironic how far the show has fallen from it's premise. It's appeal was to see an absolute zero rising in power and earning other's trust with hard work, but instead it that whole arc has now been turned into "because you were destined to" -story. Also, powercreeping has ruined the show's appeal as well. I truly enjoyed the fights in the first series because of the different and interesting techniques used as well as the tactics that played a part in them. And now it's been turned into Dragonball Z...
Same. I don't know if i'm the only one who loved the Shikamaru fights in the first series and at the start of the second. Seriously, they are awesome, this is a guy who relies in being smart to win, and not on using the latest super OP asspull. Hell, even Naruto had some moments, the Neji and Gaara fight were awesome because of that, specially the Gaara one. Now? The premise is so streched it broke.

Another one? Heroes. A lot of people have already talked about it, but...Why coudn't they let Sylar die? Really...I liked the character, but damn...
 

Ryan Hughes

New member
Jul 10, 2012
556
0
0
True Blood

I watched the show up through to the end of season two, and completely gave up on it right in the middle of the season finale. There was a girl involved in my intent to watch the series, so it is complicated, but at that point I gave up and never went back.

The initial concepts and set-up of the show are wonderful: Take a metaphor for a disenfranchised minority and set it in the deep south. This can allow the viewer to perhaps see the struggles and plight of minorities in a new light, and challenge their preconceptions and prejudice. In this case, the "minority" in question is Vampires, but it could be "Mutants" like in X-Men, or any number of arbitrary metaphors that the creators can come up with. The main point would be to draw parallels between this metaphor and the civil rights movement or the gay rights movement, which still face quite a bit of resistance in the south. Moreover, you can play into this expectation in order to challenge many prejudices that urban and more "enlightened" people may have about the deep south as well. For example, you could have a "redneck" character who assists or champions the cause of tolerance and equality, etc, etc. Or, subvert all of these expectations and just make the Vampires evil. I could go on.

I was actually impressed when I read a brief synopsis of the plot, but from the very first minutes of the show, it squandered whatever interest I may have had in it by gratuitous nudity and ridiculous shark-like sex scenes of such underlying violence that they would make the Marquis de Sade blush. I mean, I have not seen anything in my entire life that was quite as bad as True Blood. The characters are universally generic, with dialogue that goes from morally stilted to thoughtlessly cliche and nowhere in between. The one gay character is obviously a drug dealer and pornographer, because of course he is. The "sassy black woman" is so aggressive and annoying that I feel that the audience was intended to dislike her. The main character is a hapless mish-mash of coming-of-age cliches, while her love interest is an idealized and entirely non-believable "southern gentleman" fantasy.

One genuinely interesting character appeared in the second season, a vampire who had come to terms with the idea that all living things must die as a natural part of the cycle of life. I found this idea to be very interesting, and wanted to get to know the character better, but then the show promptly killed him off. All in order to go back to its own fascination with its inability to distinguish between sex and violence, and its insane non-characters bouncing off of and crashing into one another like pinballs.

Good Lord that was simply the most awful thing that I have ever sat through, and I have no regrets about quitting the show, in fact, I am completely sure that I am a smarter, happier person for doing so.
 

beastro

New member
Jan 6, 2012
564
0
0
Stargate, and yes, even the show.

IMO, it's a show that should have taken place in the middle of WWII Egypt with the British and North Afrika Korps finding themselves having to team up to stop an alien invasion.
 

Necron_warrior

OPPORTUNISTIC ANARCHIST
Mar 30, 2011
287
0
0
Been waiting for a thread like this.

~Ahem~

The God-damned let down that is ROBOTIC;NOTES


We knew you couldn't top stein's;gate, I just wish you had realised that too :(
Even the premise was interesting enough, it didn't have to have a full blown OMG HUEG CONSIPRACY (BIGGER THAT THE LAST ONE YOU GAIZ) theme in it. It is one premise that I hope gets re-done as it deserves it.
 

Eddie the head

New member
Feb 22, 2012
2,324
0
0
I think Star Treks mirror universe kind of falls under this. I mean in TOS it was fine it was a one off. But when they keep coming back to it in DS9 it not only became boring it kind of ruined the ambiguity of the TOS episode. Witch wasn't grate or anything but just a case of, damn I never really wanted to know that. See also Klingon forehead ridges.
 

laggyteabag

Scrolling through forums, instead of playing games
Legacy
Oct 25, 2009
3,447
1,180
118
UK
Gender
He/Him
Sword Art Online. Sure, I really enjoyed my time with what we got, but the first story arc was severely underused. You would think that the series would focus more on the series' namesake, but nope. We got a half a season of Sword Art Online with half-baked characters that appeared only once after their own dedicated episode, then the story arc ended in favour of the Alfheim Online story arc that was nowhere near as cool or interesting.

Alien₃ and Alien Resurrection. Screw it, im doing a movie. I loved Alien and Aliens, but 3 and Ressurection were just horrible. 3 had no likable characters other than Ripley and Clemens (who lasted a good 3 seconds after the Alien started doing it's thing), a fairly boring setting, it killed off Newt and Hicks (WHAT DO YOU MEAN HE LIVED? WHAT IS THE 'COLONIAL MARINES' GAME OF WHICH YOU SPEAK?), had god awful CGI that replaced the Alien's physical prop, and had a stupid-ass story with stupid-ass characters that did stupid-ass things. It would have been much better if they had gone with one of the scrapped scripts. And the less said about Resurrection, the better.
 

Mangod

Senior Member
Feb 20, 2011
829
0
21
Laggyteabag said:
Sword Art Online. Sure, I really enjoyed my time with what we got, but the first story arc was severely underused. You would think that the series would focus more on the series' namesake, but nope. We got a half a season of Sword Art Online with half-baked characters that appeared only once after their own dedicated episode, then the story arc ended in favour of the Alfheim Online story arc that was nowhere near as cool or interesting.

Alien©ý and Alien Resurrection. Screw it, im doing a movie. I loved Alien and Aliens, but 3 and Ressurection were just horrible. 3 had no likable characters other than Ripley and Clemens (who lasted a good 3 seconds after the Alien started doing it's thing), a fairly boring setting, it killed off Newt and Hicks (WHAT DO YOU MEAN HE LIVED? WHAT IS THE 'COLONIAL MARINES' GAME OF WHICH YOU SPEAK?), had god awful CGI that replaced the Alien's physical prop, and had a stupid-ass story with stupid-ass characters that did stupid-ass things. It would have been much better if they had gone with one of the scrapped scripts. And the less said about Resurrection, the better.
It's actually sort of funny, in a depressing-in-hindsight-way, when you look at Resurrection, and see the movie for what it truly is; not an Alien movie, but a proto-Firefly movie.