Skyline Review

Recommended Videos

DiMono

New member
Mar 18, 2010
837
0
0
I saw this movie on the weekend with my girlfriend. Now I'm going to tell you all what I think about it, because that's just the kind of guy I am.

The basic plot of the movie is familiar: aliens come to Earth and wreck our shit, and a ragtag group tries to fight them off. The specifics, however, set the movie apart. There's no cocky pilot talking back to his superiors, there's no technological breakthrough that makes everything magically okay, and there's no military force that figures out how to take down the invaders in the thirteenth hour. Okay, so basically I'm just saying it's not Independence Day, but I figure since that movie basically borrowed from every other alien invasion movie that had been made up to that point, that's enough to say it's unlike them all.

Instead, Skyline has a lot of confusion, a lot of fear, and a lot of panic. Nobody knows what to do, and the technology the aliens bring is advanced enough that my first thought when I saw it was "holy crap that's cool technology." On top of that, aside from some of the aliens being bipedal, the visual and capability designs were original enough that it didn't feel like I was just watching another movie I'd already seen.

So the plot was familiar but well done, and the characters were believable and adequately acted, but I like to think I've injected an implied "but..." into my narrative on the movie's narrative up to this point. And here it is: the movie was good, but the ending was awkward. After an hour and a half of fairly logical character development, something happens that's severe enough as to say "hold on to your dicks, it's time to get this party rolling." And then the movie immediately ends. Most movies have a point about halfway through where things have been bad for long enough, and it's time for the good guys to start winning; this movie seems to have forgotten about the second part, and just left it out.

Overall I think I need to give this movie six viagras out of ten. It starts off strong, but then just when it's time to unleash the fury it comes up limp and goes home.

So the movie starts with that weird boat dude from Haven in bed with someone who's way too hot for him, and some big beams of light shine down into the streets in a manner very reminiscent of War of the Worlds. It turns out the aliens use the light to draw people to them in order to extract their brains for use in their own future generations, who will in turn capture more humans in order to steal their brains.

It then turns out that if you were in the light but didn't get sucked in, you're still permanently affected by the light and if you have weird facial hair you also gain super strength and the ability to run with a hole in your leg. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

After the aliens almost totally depopulate downtown L.A. the military starts trying to fight back, eventually firing a nuke at one of the hovering ships, destroying the city and downing the craft, only to have the ship reassemble itself and float back up into the air as if nothing happened. Cool technology, bro.

Meanwhile, the assorted stereotypes all die off in amusingly appropriate ways, until finally the weird Haven dude and his too hot girlfriend sacrifice themselves for each other and get sucked up into the alien ship. There we learn that his brain has been taken, and her pregnancy (which we learn about at the beginning and which doesn't come into play again until this very instant, despite lots of running and stress, though she does mention it when someone lights a cigarette) saves her brain from extraction. He takes over the alien into which his brain is put, and saves her from an attack that somehow would have killed her but not harmed her brain, and he gets ready to kick some serious ass ...then the movie ends.

Something I have to address before closing this out is the premise of the aliens. Without getting too far into information revealed in the spoiler text, their purpose for coming to the planet seems entirely based on self perpetuation. Basically, without doing what they're doing, their race wouldn't survive. This draws out the question (because "begs the question" doesn't actually work that way) of how the race would have developed in such a way that this is a reasonable evolutionary step.

And what would have happened if they didn't find Earth? Or if they landed on a planet where the various species didn't have an adequately compatible physiology? The whole race could die out due to nothing more than bad luck. It may be true that any aliens that find us are likely not to be friendly, but I seriously doubt the plausibility of a race such as the one in Skyline just because the odds of it surviving over time seem extremely low.
 

mParadox

Susurration
Sep 19, 2010
28,598
0
0
Country
Germany
Seems interesting. I is intrigued. Will definitely try to see it.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
Nice review, though I will have still have to voice my displeasure over the concept of the movie and not go see it until it comes out for rent. I'm bored of stereotypical alien invasion movies.
 

DiMono

New member
Mar 18, 2010
837
0
0
ShadowsofHope said:
Nice review, though I will have still have to voice my displeasure over the concept of the movie and not go see it until it comes out for rent. I'm bored of stereotypical alien invasion movies.
I favour movies with sweeping visuals for my in-theatre choices. There's a particular scope in this movie that lends itself well to the big screen. If there's a theatre near you where you can watch it on the cheap, I think you'll get more from it than seeing it at home can provide.
 

10zack986

New member
Dec 5, 2009
262
0
0
I hope I'm not the only one that thinks these aliens look exactly like the ones from Crysis. Basically flying blue octopuses with the occasional boss monster.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
DiMono said:
ShadowsofHope said:
Nice review, though I will have still have to voice my displeasure over the concept of the movie and not go see it until it comes out for rent. I'm bored of stereotypical alien invasion movies.
I favour movies with sweeping visuals for my in-theatre choices. There's a particular scope in this movie that lends itself well to the big screen. If there's a theatre near you where you can watch it on the cheap, I think you'll get more from it than seeing it at home can provide.
While this is true, I also prefer substance with my visuals. Visuals for the sole sake of visuals are appealing at first, but soon lose their appeal heavily if nothing else follows or compliments them. I typically cherry pick movies that have a good balance of both consistently that I actually feel are worth $20 for theater fare and concession. Otherwise, it's just a waste of money for two hours of glitter.
 

newwiseman

New member
Aug 27, 2010
1,325
0
0
That movie was horrible.

Like Cloverfield, a bunch of terrified, over confident, douches scamper about, only in an apartment building instead of Manhattan. All the while thinking "I think we'll be safe on the water" because it's so easy to hide a boat from an overwhelming sky-bound presence, even though they can't make it out of the building.

The main problem I had with this movie isn't so much the set-up or plot, but the aliens themselves. Somehow we are to believe that an intergalactic civilization has founded all of it's technology on human brains; spinal cord attached. It's so insane a concept that all they need to repair a nuked smoldering pile of mothership is more brains, which they happen to have on hand.

To top it off the story fails to bring about any climax or resolution with the ending where, -SPOILER ALERT- the main hero maintains his sense of self after being plugged into some sort of independence day styled combat armor. We then see him smashing other brains through the credits. The move has a solid start, a mediocre progression, and an ending M. Night Shyamalan couldn't make worse.

Thinking about it the armors themselves were able to harvest brains without one currently installed, raising the question why do they need brains in the first place, other than as a stupid reason to invade earth.

It's a do nothing movie with no notable reason for existing.
 

Cormitt

New member
Apr 16, 2009
93
0
0
See I take this flick as what Cloverfield should have been. Well until the totally botched ending. They could have cut out everything after (SPOILER ALERT) the kiss and it's an infinitely better ending. Heck for shytes and giggles they could have cut the movie 10 seconds before that and it would have been vastly improved.

My only hope for is that the movie was a victim of studio editing and maybe the DVD will have a director's cut that was worthy of the 95% of the rest of the movie.

Still it was a good popcorn flick for November.
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,051
0
41
newwiseman said:
It's a do nothing movie with no notable reason for existing.
I agree almost entirely with your post with one exception. There is a reason this movie exists: it's an incredible graphical showcase! That CGI was absolutely stunning; it's by far the best I have ever seen, Avatar included. My god, some of the shots in this movie were just jaw-dropping.

Too bad this movie had the horrible characters (calling them cardboard would be an insult to a useful packing material), gaping holes in logic/excessive fridge logic (the human brain point DiMono mentioned is a great example), and that massively disappointing ending. It could have been great, instead it has to settle for well below average. 2/5
 

newwiseman

New member
Aug 27, 2010
1,325
0
0
AvsJoe said:
newwiseman said:
It's a do nothing movie with no notable reason for existing.
I agree almost entirely with your post with one exception. There is a reason this movie exists: it's an incredible graphical showcase! That CGI was absolutely stunning; it's by far the best I have ever seen, Avatar included. My god, some of the shots in this movie were just jaw-dropping.


I hope your being sarcastic. It's like Spawn all over again...

I've been working with Maya and 3dStudioMax for years and know first hand the level of the technology right now. I say that because the CGI in that movie was average for most art houses now days. I've seen episodes of Stargate: Atlantis and Universe with better CGI. I will commend whoever the lighting team was, too often the textures get over-blown or the intensity of the scene doesn't match the film's, and the editors did a excellent job of matching the fully rendered product to the films original grain. It also wasn't so over done as to be a gimmick, which is to be respected. So thumbs up given where it's due.

But no film is ever good or even watchable because of the level of it's art. "Good CG can make a good film better it can't make a good film." -Guy at a lecture. This film can't even be put up as an incredible graphical showcase! just because it completely eclipsed by the level of the short films and independent works being made by students and designers for portfolios. That's not to say the art-house couldn't have done better; how good can you really make something when you take in to account the quantity of time a Hi-Res scene takes to render? At 4-5hours, per frame/ per computer at 30mininum fps, for something really good and life-like it can take months at the render farm to finish.

So is the CG good? Ya. Is the movie worth seeing for that? No. Will the industry make more movies like this? ...Yes (sigh)
 

unicron44

New member
Oct 12, 2010
869
0
0
I didn't like if you want to see my whole thoughts you can check out my review http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.245955-Review-of-Skyline-SPOILERS

But I was just bored during most of the movies. I could have given two shits about anyone. It wasn't even a decent popcorn flick because it so boring.